Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions

In this study, we examine how development status and water scarcity shape people's perceptions of "hard path" and "soft path" water solutions. Based on ethnographic research conducted in four semi-rural/peri-urban sites (in Bolivia, Fiji, New Zealand, and the US), we use con...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Wutich, A. C. White, D. D. White, K. L. Larson, A. Brewis, C. Roberts
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-01-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/109/2014/hess-18-109-2014.pdf
id doaj-01bbe93248d6464488a06a382bd74a5f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01bbe93248d6464488a06a382bd74a5f2020-11-25T00:02:17ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382014-01-0118110912010.5194/hess-18-109-2014Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutionsA. Wutich0A. C. White1D. D. White2K. L. Larson3A. Brewis4C. Roberts5School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, USASchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, USASchool of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University, Tempe, USASchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning and School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, USASchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, USASchool of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, USAIn this study, we examine how development status and water scarcity shape people's perceptions of "hard path" and "soft path" water solutions. Based on ethnographic research conducted in four semi-rural/peri-urban sites (in Bolivia, Fiji, New Zealand, and the US), we use content analysis to conduct statistical and thematic comparisons of interview data. Our results indicate clear differences associated with development status and, to a lesser extent, water scarcity. People in the two less developed sites were more likely to suggest hard path solutions, less likely to suggest soft path solutions, and more likely to see no path to solutions than people in the more developed sites. Thematically, people in the two less developed sites envisioned solutions that involve small-scale water infrastructure and decentralized, community-based solutions, while people in the more developed sites envisioned solutions that involve large-scale infrastructure and centralized, regulatory water solutions. People in the two water-scarce sites were less likely to suggest soft path solutions and more likely to see no path to solutions (but no more likely to suggest hard path solutions) than people in the water-rich sites. Thematically, people in the two water-rich sites seemed to perceive a wider array of unrealized potential soft path solutions than those in the water-scarce sites. On balance, our findings are encouraging in that they indicate that people are receptive to soft path solutions in a range of sites, even those with limited financial or water resources. Our research points to the need for more studies that investigate the social feasibility of soft path water solutions, particularly in sites with significant financial and natural resource constraints.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/109/2014/hess-18-109-2014.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. Wutich
A. C. White
D. D. White
K. L. Larson
A. Brewis
C. Roberts
spellingShingle A. Wutich
A. C. White
D. D. White
K. L. Larson
A. Brewis
C. Roberts
Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet A. Wutich
A. C. White
D. D. White
K. L. Larson
A. Brewis
C. Roberts
author_sort A. Wutich
title Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
title_short Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
title_full Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
title_fullStr Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
title_full_unstemmed Hard paths, soft paths or no paths? Cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
title_sort hard paths, soft paths or no paths? cross-cultural perceptions of water solutions
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In this study, we examine how development status and water scarcity shape people's perceptions of "hard path" and "soft path" water solutions. Based on ethnographic research conducted in four semi-rural/peri-urban sites (in Bolivia, Fiji, New Zealand, and the US), we use content analysis to conduct statistical and thematic comparisons of interview data. Our results indicate clear differences associated with development status and, to a lesser extent, water scarcity. People in the two less developed sites were more likely to suggest hard path solutions, less likely to suggest soft path solutions, and more likely to see no path to solutions than people in the more developed sites. Thematically, people in the two less developed sites envisioned solutions that involve small-scale water infrastructure and decentralized, community-based solutions, while people in the more developed sites envisioned solutions that involve large-scale infrastructure and centralized, regulatory water solutions. People in the two water-scarce sites were less likely to suggest soft path solutions and more likely to see no path to solutions (but no more likely to suggest hard path solutions) than people in the water-rich sites. Thematically, people in the two water-rich sites seemed to perceive a wider array of unrealized potential soft path solutions than those in the water-scarce sites. On balance, our findings are encouraging in that they indicate that people are receptive to soft path solutions in a range of sites, even those with limited financial or water resources. Our research points to the need for more studies that investigate the social feasibility of soft path water solutions, particularly in sites with significant financial and natural resource constraints.
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/18/109/2014/hess-18-109-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT awutich hardpathssoftpathsornopathscrossculturalperceptionsofwatersolutions
AT acwhite hardpathssoftpathsornopathscrossculturalperceptionsofwatersolutions
AT ddwhite hardpathssoftpathsornopathscrossculturalperceptionsofwatersolutions
AT kllarson hardpathssoftpathsornopathscrossculturalperceptionsofwatersolutions
AT abrewis hardpathssoftpathsornopathscrossculturalperceptionsofwatersolutions
AT croberts hardpathssoftpathsornopathscrossculturalperceptionsofwatersolutions
_version_ 1725438502992084992