Considerations for effective science communication

It is increasingly common for scientists to engage in sharing science-related knowledge with diverse knowledge users—an activity called science communication. Given that many scientists now seek information on how to communicate effectively, we have generated a list of 16 important considerations fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven J. Cooke, Austin J. Gallagher, Natalie M. Sopinka, Vivian M. Nguyen, Rachel A. Skubel, Neil Hammerschlag, Sarah Boon, Nathan Young, Andy J. Danylchuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 2017-03-01
Series:FACETS
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0055
id doaj-01c8de12e4674d2d8c018b7f0fd9df4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01c8de12e4674d2d8c018b7f0fd9df4f2020-11-25T01:37:08ZengCanadian Science PublishingFACETS2371-16712371-16712017-03-01223324810.1139/facets-2016-0055Considerations for effective science communicationSteven J. Cooke0Austin J. Gallagher1Natalie M. Sopinka2Vivian M. Nguyen3Rachel A. Skubel4Neil Hammerschlag5Sarah Boon6Nathan Young7Andy J. Danylchuk8Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, CanadaBeneath the Waves, Inc., Miami, FL 33149, USA; Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USAGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9C 1A2, CanadaFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute for Environmental Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, CanadaRosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA; Abess Center for Ecosystem Science & Policy, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USARosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33149, USA; Abess Center for Ecosystem Science & Policy, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USACreekside Communication, Cobble Hill, BC V0R 1L6, CanadaDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USAIt is increasingly common for scientists to engage in sharing science-related knowledge with diverse knowledge users—an activity called science communication. Given that many scientists now seek information on how to communicate effectively, we have generated a list of 16 important considerations for those interested in science communication: (1) Define what science communication means to you and your research; (2) Know—and listen to—your target audience; (3) Consider a diverse but coordinated communication portfolio; (4) Draft skilled players and build a network; (5) Create and seize opportunities; (6) Be creative when you communicate; (7) Focus on the science in science communication; (8) Be an honest broker; (9) Understand the science of science communication; (10) Think like an entrepreneur; (11) Don’t let your colleagues stop you; (12) Integrate science communication into your research program; (13) Recognize how science communication enhances your science; (14) Request science communication funds from grants; (15) Strive for bidirectional communication; and (16) Evaluate, reflect, and be prepared to adapt. It is our ambition that the ideas shared here will encourage readers to engage in science communication and increase the effectiveness of those already active in science communication, stimulating them to share their experiences with others.http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0055science engagementscience outreachcommunication scienceevaluation of science communicationacademic culturesprofessional development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Steven J. Cooke
Austin J. Gallagher
Natalie M. Sopinka
Vivian M. Nguyen
Rachel A. Skubel
Neil Hammerschlag
Sarah Boon
Nathan Young
Andy J. Danylchuk
spellingShingle Steven J. Cooke
Austin J. Gallagher
Natalie M. Sopinka
Vivian M. Nguyen
Rachel A. Skubel
Neil Hammerschlag
Sarah Boon
Nathan Young
Andy J. Danylchuk
Considerations for effective science communication
FACETS
science engagement
science outreach
communication science
evaluation of science communication
academic cultures
professional development
author_facet Steven J. Cooke
Austin J. Gallagher
Natalie M. Sopinka
Vivian M. Nguyen
Rachel A. Skubel
Neil Hammerschlag
Sarah Boon
Nathan Young
Andy J. Danylchuk
author_sort Steven J. Cooke
title Considerations for effective science communication
title_short Considerations for effective science communication
title_full Considerations for effective science communication
title_fullStr Considerations for effective science communication
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for effective science communication
title_sort considerations for effective science communication
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
series FACETS
issn 2371-1671
2371-1671
publishDate 2017-03-01
description It is increasingly common for scientists to engage in sharing science-related knowledge with diverse knowledge users—an activity called science communication. Given that many scientists now seek information on how to communicate effectively, we have generated a list of 16 important considerations for those interested in science communication: (1) Define what science communication means to you and your research; (2) Know—and listen to—your target audience; (3) Consider a diverse but coordinated communication portfolio; (4) Draft skilled players and build a network; (5) Create and seize opportunities; (6) Be creative when you communicate; (7) Focus on the science in science communication; (8) Be an honest broker; (9) Understand the science of science communication; (10) Think like an entrepreneur; (11) Don’t let your colleagues stop you; (12) Integrate science communication into your research program; (13) Recognize how science communication enhances your science; (14) Request science communication funds from grants; (15) Strive for bidirectional communication; and (16) Evaluate, reflect, and be prepared to adapt. It is our ambition that the ideas shared here will encourage readers to engage in science communication and increase the effectiveness of those already active in science communication, stimulating them to share their experiences with others.
topic science engagement
science outreach
communication science
evaluation of science communication
academic cultures
professional development
url http://www.facetsjournal.com/doi/10.1139/facets-2016-0055
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenjcooke considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT austinjgallagher considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT nataliemsopinka considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT vivianmnguyen considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT rachelaskubel considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT neilhammerschlag considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT sarahboon considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT nathanyoung considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
AT andyjdanylchuk considerationsforeffectivesciencecommunication
_version_ 1725059546557186048