Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in Orleans

French law on major risk preventive information for population setup the objective to make the citizen able to act for his own safety and to participate through his behaviour to the civil security. To reach this objective, the policymakers developed 4 regulatory tools that have to be implemented by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jadot Julien, Gemon Cathy, Richard Isabelle, Bauduceau Nicolas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2016-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160715002
id doaj-01cdbd877ac34d4b91a004766f5ac10e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-01cdbd877ac34d4b91a004766f5ac10e2021-04-02T10:52:17ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422016-01-0171500210.1051/e3sconf/20160715002e3sconf_flood2016_15002Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in OrleansJadot Julien0Gemon Cathy1Richard Isabelle2Bauduceau Nicolas3Centre Européen de Prévention du Risque Inondation (CEPRI)Centre Européen de Prévention du Risque Inondation (CEPRI)Senior researcher and consultant in environmental psychology, EnvironnonsCentre Européen de Prévention du Risque Inondation (CEPRI)French law on major risk preventive information for population setup the objective to make the citizen able to act for his own safety and to participate through his behaviour to the civil security. To reach this objective, the policymakers developed 4 regulatory tools that have to be implemented by the local authorities. These 4 tools do not meet the success factors of risk communication measures aiming at inducing behavioural adaptation to face risks. This, added to the fact that people who die in the last floods events in France lost their lives due to either a lack of knowledge of the risk or to a risk taking behaviour, led us to question the impact of the preventive information regulatory tools. For the needs of our study we developed a risk perception and behaviour scale, helping us to classify the people of our sample. Our evaluation in Orléans shows that very few people know the regulatory tools and that their impact is quite low, far from the policymakers’ expectations. This highlight the real necessity to innovate in the field of flood risk communication.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160715002
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jadot Julien
Gemon Cathy
Richard Isabelle
Bauduceau Nicolas
spellingShingle Jadot Julien
Gemon Cathy
Richard Isabelle
Bauduceau Nicolas
Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in Orleans
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Jadot Julien
Gemon Cathy
Richard Isabelle
Bauduceau Nicolas
author_sort Jadot Julien
title Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in Orleans
title_short Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in Orleans
title_full Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in Orleans
title_fullStr Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in Orleans
title_full_unstemmed Does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? An evaluation of the effects of French regulatory tools in Orleans
title_sort does flood risk information held within at risk population always have a positive impact? an evaluation of the effects of french regulatory tools in orleans
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2016-01-01
description French law on major risk preventive information for population setup the objective to make the citizen able to act for his own safety and to participate through his behaviour to the civil security. To reach this objective, the policymakers developed 4 regulatory tools that have to be implemented by the local authorities. These 4 tools do not meet the success factors of risk communication measures aiming at inducing behavioural adaptation to face risks. This, added to the fact that people who die in the last floods events in France lost their lives due to either a lack of knowledge of the risk or to a risk taking behaviour, led us to question the impact of the preventive information regulatory tools. For the needs of our study we developed a risk perception and behaviour scale, helping us to classify the people of our sample. Our evaluation in Orléans shows that very few people know the regulatory tools and that their impact is quite low, far from the policymakers’ expectations. This highlight the real necessity to innovate in the field of flood risk communication.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160715002
work_keys_str_mv AT jadotjulien doesfloodriskinformationheldwithinatriskpopulationalwayshaveapositiveimpactanevaluationoftheeffectsoffrenchregulatorytoolsinorleans
AT gemoncathy doesfloodriskinformationheldwithinatriskpopulationalwayshaveapositiveimpactanevaluationoftheeffectsoffrenchregulatorytoolsinorleans
AT richardisabelle doesfloodriskinformationheldwithinatriskpopulationalwayshaveapositiveimpactanevaluationoftheeffectsoffrenchregulatorytoolsinorleans
AT bauduceaunicolas doesfloodriskinformationheldwithinatriskpopulationalwayshaveapositiveimpactanevaluationoftheeffectsoffrenchregulatorytoolsinorleans
_version_ 1724166505144254464