Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor
ObjectivesTo compare the surgical, pathological and oncological outcomes of single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy against laparotomy for large ovarian tumor (>15 cm) suspected to be a borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) on preoperative imaging.MethodsA retrospective review of the patients who under...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.583515/full |
id |
doaj-01e51fd099474651b5c271a39844398e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jun-Hyeok Kang Joseph J. Noh Soo Young Jeong Jung In Shim Yoo-Young Lee Chel Hun Choi Jeong-Won Lee Byoung-Gie Kim Duk-Soo Bae Hyun-Soo Kim Tae-Joong Kim |
spellingShingle |
Jun-Hyeok Kang Joseph J. Noh Soo Young Jeong Jung In Shim Yoo-Young Lee Chel Hun Choi Jeong-Won Lee Byoung-Gie Kim Duk-Soo Bae Hyun-Soo Kim Tae-Joong Kim Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor Frontiers in Oncology borderline ovarian tumor single-port access laparoendoscopic single-site laparotomy large ovarian tumor |
author_facet |
Jun-Hyeok Kang Joseph J. Noh Soo Young Jeong Jung In Shim Yoo-Young Lee Chel Hun Choi Jeong-Won Lee Byoung-Gie Kim Duk-Soo Bae Hyun-Soo Kim Tae-Joong Kim |
author_sort |
Jun-Hyeok Kang |
title |
Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor |
title_short |
Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor |
title_full |
Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor |
title_fullStr |
Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian Tumor |
title_sort |
feasibility of single-port access (spa) laparoscopy for large ovarian tumor suspected to be borderline ovarian tumor |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
ObjectivesTo compare the surgical, pathological and oncological outcomes of single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy against laparotomy for large ovarian tumor (>15 cm) suspected to be a borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) on preoperative imaging.MethodsA retrospective review of the patients who underwent SPA laparoscopy (SPA Group) or laparotomy (Laparotomy Group) for suspected BOT was performed. Surgical outcomes, including the rates of iatrogenic spillage of tumor contents, and oncological outcomes, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were compared between the two groups. Correlation between intraoperative frozen section analysis and permanent pathology results was also assessed.ResultsA total of 178 patients underwent surgical treatment for suspected large BOT. Among them, 105 patients with a mean tumor diameter of 20.9 ± 6.5 cm underwent SPA laparoscopy, and the other 73 patients, with a mean tumor diameter 20.2 ± 5.9 cm, underwent laparotomy. The mean operation time did not differ between the two groups (99.1 ± 41.9 min for SPA Group vs. 107.3 ± 35.7 min for Laparotomy Group, p = 0.085). There was no difference in the occurrence of iatrogenic spillage of tumor contents between the groups either (11.4% in the SPA Group vs. 6.8% in the Laparotomy Group, p = 0.381). However, the postoperative complication rates were significantly higher in the Laparotomy Group compared with SPA Group (16.4% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.025). The surgical approach was not associated with the misdiagnosis rates of frozen section analysis (19% in the SPA Group vs. 26% in the Laparotomy Group, p = 0.484). The most common histologic type of the tumors was mucinous in both groups.ConclusionSPA laparoscopy is feasible, safe, and not inferior to laparotomy for surgical treatment of large ovarian tumors that suspected to be BOT on preoperative imaging. |
topic |
borderline ovarian tumor single-port access laparoendoscopic single-site laparotomy large ovarian tumor |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.583515/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT junhyeokkang feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT josephjnoh feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT sooyoungjeong feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT junginshim feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT yooyounglee feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT chelhunchoi feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT jeongwonlee feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT byounggiekim feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT duksoobae feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT hyunsookim feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor AT taejoongkim feasibilityofsingleportaccessspalaparoscopyforlargeovariantumorsuspectedtobeborderlineovariantumor |
_version_ |
1724563564160614400 |
spelling |
doaj-01e51fd099474651b5c271a39844398e2020-11-25T03:33:16ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-09-011010.3389/fonc.2020.583515583515Feasibility of Single-Port Access (SPA) Laparoscopy for Large Ovarian Tumor Suspected to Be Borderline Ovarian TumorJun-Hyeok Kang0Joseph J. Noh1Soo Young Jeong2Jung In Shim3Yoo-Young Lee4Chel Hun Choi5Jeong-Won Lee6Byoung-Gie Kim7Duk-Soo Bae8Hyun-Soo Kim9Tae-Joong Kim10Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Pathology and Translation Genomics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South KoreaObjectivesTo compare the surgical, pathological and oncological outcomes of single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy against laparotomy for large ovarian tumor (>15 cm) suspected to be a borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) on preoperative imaging.MethodsA retrospective review of the patients who underwent SPA laparoscopy (SPA Group) or laparotomy (Laparotomy Group) for suspected BOT was performed. Surgical outcomes, including the rates of iatrogenic spillage of tumor contents, and oncological outcomes, such as recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), were compared between the two groups. Correlation between intraoperative frozen section analysis and permanent pathology results was also assessed.ResultsA total of 178 patients underwent surgical treatment for suspected large BOT. Among them, 105 patients with a mean tumor diameter of 20.9 ± 6.5 cm underwent SPA laparoscopy, and the other 73 patients, with a mean tumor diameter 20.2 ± 5.9 cm, underwent laparotomy. The mean operation time did not differ between the two groups (99.1 ± 41.9 min for SPA Group vs. 107.3 ± 35.7 min for Laparotomy Group, p = 0.085). There was no difference in the occurrence of iatrogenic spillage of tumor contents between the groups either (11.4% in the SPA Group vs. 6.8% in the Laparotomy Group, p = 0.381). However, the postoperative complication rates were significantly higher in the Laparotomy Group compared with SPA Group (16.4% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.025). The surgical approach was not associated with the misdiagnosis rates of frozen section analysis (19% in the SPA Group vs. 26% in the Laparotomy Group, p = 0.484). The most common histologic type of the tumors was mucinous in both groups.ConclusionSPA laparoscopy is feasible, safe, and not inferior to laparotomy for surgical treatment of large ovarian tumors that suspected to be BOT on preoperative imaging.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.583515/fullborderline ovarian tumorsingle-port accesslaparoendoscopic single-sitelaparotomylarge ovarian tumor |