Learn to Extract Building Outline from Misaligned Annotation through Nearest Feature Selector

For efficient building outline extraction, many algorithms, including unsupervised or supervised, have been proposed over the past decades. In recent years, due to the rapid development of the convolutional neural networks, especially fully convolutional networks, building extraction is treated as a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuxuan Wang, Guangming Wu, Yimin Guo, Yifei Huang, Ryosuke Shibasaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-08-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/17/2722
Description
Summary:For efficient building outline extraction, many algorithms, including unsupervised or supervised, have been proposed over the past decades. In recent years, due to the rapid development of the convolutional neural networks, especially fully convolutional networks, building extraction is treated as a semantic segmentation task that deals with the extremely biased positive pixels. The state-of-the-art methods, either through direct or indirect approaches, are mainly focused on better network design. The shifts and rotations, which are coarsely presented in manually created annotations, have long been ignored. Due to the limited number of positive samples, the misalignment will significantly reduce the correctness of pixel-to-pixel loss that might lead to a gradient explosion. To overcome this, we propose a nearest feature selector (NFS) to dynamically re-align the prediction and slightly misaligned annotations. The NFS can be seamlessly appended to existing loss functions and prevent misleading by the errors or misalignment of annotations. Experiments on a large scale aerial image dataset with centered buildings and corresponding building outlines indicate that the additional NFS brings higher performance when compared to existing naive loss functions. In the classic L1 loss, the addition of NFS gains increments of 8.8% of f1-score, 8.9% of kappa coefficient, and 9.8% of Jaccard index, respectively.
ISSN:2072-4292