Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake

Food intake changes circulating metabolite concentrations. Thus, a comparison of circulating metabolites between dogs and cats is necessarily confounded by the composition of foods offered. The objective of this study was to determine differences between dogs and cats when given the opportunity to c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean A. Hall, Matthew I. Jackson, Jodi C. Vondran, Melissa A. Vanchina, Dennis E. Jewell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Company of Biologists 2018-11-01
Series:Biology Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bio.biologists.org/content/7/11/bio036228
id doaj-0227fc80105a40948869b0fb217be2ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0227fc80105a40948869b0fb217be2ae2021-06-02T18:12:28ZengThe Company of BiologistsBiology Open2046-63902018-11-0171110.1242/bio.036228036228Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intakeJean A. Hall0Matthew I. Jackson1Jodi C. Vondran2Melissa A. Vanchina3Dennis E. Jewell4 Department of Biomedical Sciences, Dryden Hall 206, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-4802, USA Pet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA Pet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA Pet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA Pet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, 1035 NE 43rd Street, Topeka, Kansas 66617-1587, USA Food intake changes circulating metabolite concentrations. Thus, a comparison of circulating metabolites between dogs and cats is necessarily confounded by the composition of foods offered. The objective of this study was to determine differences between dogs and cats when given the opportunity to choose their own macronutrient intake. Four experimental foods with similar palatability, but varying in macronutrient content were prepared for dogs, and four for cats. Foods were available to dogs (n=17) for food intake once a day and to cats (n=27) at all times. Food 1 was high protein; Food 2 was high fat; Food 3 was high carbohydrates and Food 4 was balanced for macronutrients. By choosing a combination of foods, each animal could individually set its own macronutrient intake. Plasma metabolomics were determined after pets had consumed their food intake of choice for 28 days. Cats had higher concentrations of the essential amino acids histidine, isoleucine, phenylalanine and valine, but lower concentrations of lysine, methionine and threonine compared with dogs. Overall, non-essential amino acids were higher in cats. Regarding lipids, cats had increased concentrations of highly polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) after 28 days, although arachidonic acid (AA) was consistently higher in dogs. Regarding circulating microbial metabolites, there was more stability for dogs compared with cats (none changed over time in dogs versus 42% changed in cats; P<0.01). Concentrations of urea cycle intermediates, antioxidants and methylated compounds were also different between species. In conclusion, metabolite differences between dogs and cats reflected differences in species and food choices.http://bio.biologists.org/content/7/11/bio036228CatsCirculating metabolitesDogsFood intakeMacronutrient intake
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jean A. Hall
Matthew I. Jackson
Jodi C. Vondran
Melissa A. Vanchina
Dennis E. Jewell
spellingShingle Jean A. Hall
Matthew I. Jackson
Jodi C. Vondran
Melissa A. Vanchina
Dennis E. Jewell
Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake
Biology Open
Cats
Circulating metabolites
Dogs
Food intake
Macronutrient intake
author_facet Jean A. Hall
Matthew I. Jackson
Jodi C. Vondran
Melissa A. Vanchina
Dennis E. Jewell
author_sort Jean A. Hall
title Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake
title_short Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake
title_full Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake
title_fullStr Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake
title_sort comparison of circulating metabolite concentrations in dogs and cats when allowed to freely choose macronutrient intake
publisher The Company of Biologists
series Biology Open
issn 2046-6390
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Food intake changes circulating metabolite concentrations. Thus, a comparison of circulating metabolites between dogs and cats is necessarily confounded by the composition of foods offered. The objective of this study was to determine differences between dogs and cats when given the opportunity to choose their own macronutrient intake. Four experimental foods with similar palatability, but varying in macronutrient content were prepared for dogs, and four for cats. Foods were available to dogs (n=17) for food intake once a day and to cats (n=27) at all times. Food 1 was high protein; Food 2 was high fat; Food 3 was high carbohydrates and Food 4 was balanced for macronutrients. By choosing a combination of foods, each animal could individually set its own macronutrient intake. Plasma metabolomics were determined after pets had consumed their food intake of choice for 28 days. Cats had higher concentrations of the essential amino acids histidine, isoleucine, phenylalanine and valine, but lower concentrations of lysine, methionine and threonine compared with dogs. Overall, non-essential amino acids were higher in cats. Regarding lipids, cats had increased concentrations of highly polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) after 28 days, although arachidonic acid (AA) was consistently higher in dogs. Regarding circulating microbial metabolites, there was more stability for dogs compared with cats (none changed over time in dogs versus 42% changed in cats; P<0.01). Concentrations of urea cycle intermediates, antioxidants and methylated compounds were also different between species. In conclusion, metabolite differences between dogs and cats reflected differences in species and food choices.
topic Cats
Circulating metabolites
Dogs
Food intake
Macronutrient intake
url http://bio.biologists.org/content/7/11/bio036228
work_keys_str_mv AT jeanahall comparisonofcirculatingmetaboliteconcentrationsindogsandcatswhenallowedtofreelychoosemacronutrientintake
AT matthewijackson comparisonofcirculatingmetaboliteconcentrationsindogsandcatswhenallowedtofreelychoosemacronutrientintake
AT jodicvondran comparisonofcirculatingmetaboliteconcentrationsindogsandcatswhenallowedtofreelychoosemacronutrientintake
AT melissaavanchina comparisonofcirculatingmetaboliteconcentrationsindogsandcatswhenallowedtofreelychoosemacronutrientintake
AT dennisejewell comparisonofcirculatingmetaboliteconcentrationsindogsandcatswhenallowedtofreelychoosemacronutrientintake
_version_ 1721402246840713216