The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure Gradient

Increase in left ventricular (LV) mass develops as a compensatory mechanism against pressure overload in aortic valve stenosis. However, long-standing LV geometrical changes are related to poor prognosis. The LV geometrical change occurs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The prese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Satoshi Yamaguchi, Yuka Otaki, Balaji K. Tamarappoo, Tetsuya Ohira, Hiroki Ikenaga, Jun Yoshida, Tarun Chakravarty, John Friedman, Daniel Berman, Florian Rader, Robert J. Siegel, Raj Makkar, Takahiro Shiota
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-09-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3143
id doaj-02480fd750a5439594e25c92553d65b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-02480fd750a5439594e25c92553d65b92020-11-25T03:19:23ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-09-0193143314310.3390/jcm9103143The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure GradientSatoshi Yamaguchi0Yuka Otaki1Balaji K. Tamarappoo2Tetsuya Ohira3Hiroki Ikenaga4Jun Yoshida5Tarun Chakravarty6John Friedman7Daniel Berman8Florian Rader9Robert J. Siegel10Raj Makkar11Takahiro Shiota12Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USADepartment of Epidemiology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1247, JapanSmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USASmidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USAIncrease in left ventricular (LV) mass develops as a compensatory mechanism against pressure overload in aortic valve stenosis. However, long-standing LV geometrical changes are related to poor prognosis. The LV geometrical change occurs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between improvement in valvuloarterial impedance (Zva) and change in LV mass index (LVMI) and the ratio of LVMI to LV end-diastolic volume index (LVMI/LVEDVI). We compared these relationships to that between Zva and mean pressure gradient (MPG). Baseline and follow-up transthoracic echocardiograms of 301 patients who underwent TAVR from November 2011 to December 2015 were reviewed. Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to compare ΔLVMI and ΔLVMI/LVEDVI with Zva or MPG. The correlation between ΔZva and ΔLVMI (ρ = 0.47, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was superior to that between ΔMPG and ΔLVMI (ρ = 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.009) (<i>p</i> for comparison < 0.001). The correlation between ΔZva and ΔLVMI/LVEDVI was statistically significant (ρ = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001); in contrast, that of ΔMPG and ΔLVMI/LVEDVI was not. The improvement in Zva after TAVR was more closely related to LVMI and LVMI/LVEDVI reduction than MPG reduction.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3143aortic valve stenosisleft ventricular massleft ventricular remodeling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Satoshi Yamaguchi
Yuka Otaki
Balaji K. Tamarappoo
Tetsuya Ohira
Hiroki Ikenaga
Jun Yoshida
Tarun Chakravarty
John Friedman
Daniel Berman
Florian Rader
Robert J. Siegel
Raj Makkar
Takahiro Shiota
spellingShingle Satoshi Yamaguchi
Yuka Otaki
Balaji K. Tamarappoo
Tetsuya Ohira
Hiroki Ikenaga
Jun Yoshida
Tarun Chakravarty
John Friedman
Daniel Berman
Florian Rader
Robert J. Siegel
Raj Makkar
Takahiro Shiota
The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure Gradient
Journal of Clinical Medicine
aortic valve stenosis
left ventricular mass
left ventricular remodeling
author_facet Satoshi Yamaguchi
Yuka Otaki
Balaji K. Tamarappoo
Tetsuya Ohira
Hiroki Ikenaga
Jun Yoshida
Tarun Chakravarty
John Friedman
Daniel Berman
Florian Rader
Robert J. Siegel
Raj Makkar
Takahiro Shiota
author_sort Satoshi Yamaguchi
title The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure Gradient
title_short The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure Gradient
title_full The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure Gradient
title_fullStr The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure Gradient
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Valvuloarterial Impedance on Left Ventricular Geometrical Change after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Comparison between Valvuloarterial Impedance and Mean Pressure Gradient
title_sort impact of valvuloarterial impedance on left ventricular geometrical change after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a comparison between valvuloarterial impedance and mean pressure gradient
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Increase in left ventricular (LV) mass develops as a compensatory mechanism against pressure overload in aortic valve stenosis. However, long-standing LV geometrical changes are related to poor prognosis. The LV geometrical change occurs after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between improvement in valvuloarterial impedance (Zva) and change in LV mass index (LVMI) and the ratio of LVMI to LV end-diastolic volume index (LVMI/LVEDVI). We compared these relationships to that between Zva and mean pressure gradient (MPG). Baseline and follow-up transthoracic echocardiograms of 301 patients who underwent TAVR from November 2011 to December 2015 were reviewed. Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to compare ΔLVMI and ΔLVMI/LVEDVI with Zva or MPG. The correlation between ΔZva and ΔLVMI (ρ = 0.47, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was superior to that between ΔMPG and ΔLVMI (ρ = 0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.009) (<i>p</i> for comparison < 0.001). The correlation between ΔZva and ΔLVMI/LVEDVI was statistically significant (ρ = 0.54, <i>p</i> < 0.001); in contrast, that of ΔMPG and ΔLVMI/LVEDVI was not. The improvement in Zva after TAVR was more closely related to LVMI and LVMI/LVEDVI reduction than MPG reduction.
topic aortic valve stenosis
left ventricular mass
left ventricular remodeling
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3143
work_keys_str_mv AT satoshiyamaguchi theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT yukaotaki theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT balajiktamarappoo theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT tetsuyaohira theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT hirokiikenaga theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT junyoshida theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT tarunchakravarty theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT johnfriedman theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT danielberman theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT florianrader theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT robertjsiegel theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT rajmakkar theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT takahiroshiota theimpactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT satoshiyamaguchi impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT yukaotaki impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT balajiktamarappoo impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT tetsuyaohira impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT hirokiikenaga impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT junyoshida impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT tarunchakravarty impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT johnfriedman impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT danielberman impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT florianrader impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT robertjsiegel impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT rajmakkar impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
AT takahiroshiota impactofvalvuloarterialimpedanceonleftventriculargeometricalchangeaftertranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementacomparisonbetweenvalvuloarterialimpedanceandmeanpressuregradient
_version_ 1724622765715095552