Auto-segmentations by convolutional neural network in cervical and anorectal cancer with clinical structure sets as the ground truth

• Main Authors: Hanna Sartor, David Minarik, Olof Enqvist, Johannes Ulén, Anders Wittrup, Maria Bjurberg, Elin Trägårdh
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2020-11-01
• Series: Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
• Subjects: Cervical cancer radiotherapy; Organs-at-risk; Clinical Target Volume; Automatic segmentation; Convolutional neural network
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630820300756

Background: It is time-consuming for oncologists to delineate volumes for radiotherapy treatment in computer tomography (CT) images. Automatic delineation based on image processing exists, but with varied accuracy and moderate time savings. Using convolutional neural network (CNN), delineations of volumes are faster and more accurate. We have used CTs with the annotated structure sets to train and evaluate a CNN. Material and methods: The CNN is a standard segmentation network modified to minimize memory usage. We used CTs and structure sets from 75 cervical cancers and 191 anorectal cancers receiving radiation therapy at Skåne University Hospital 2014-2018. Five structures were investigated: left/right femoral heads, bladder, bowel bag, and clinical target volume of lymph nodes (CTVNs). Dice score and mean surface distance (MSD) (mm) evaluated accuracy, and one oncologist qualitatively evaluated auto-segmentations. Results: Median Dice/MSD scores for anorectal cancer: 0.91–0.92/1.93–1.86 femoral heads, 0.94/2.07 bladder, and 0.83/6.80 bowel bag. Median Dice scores for cervical cancer were 0.93–0.94/1.42–1.49 femoral heads, 0.84/3.51 bladder, 0.88/5.80 bowel bag, and 0.82/3.89 CTVNs. With qualitative evaluation, performance on femoral heads and bladder auto-segmentations was mostly excellent, but CTVN auto-segmentations were not acceptable to a larger extent. Discussion: It is possible to train a CNN with high overlap using structure sets as ground truth. Manually delineated pelvic volumes from structure sets do not always strictly follow volume boundaries and are sometimes inaccurately defined, which leads to similar inaccuracies in the CNN output. More data that is consistently annotated is needed to achieve higher CNN accuracy and to enable future clinical implementation.