Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling

We undertook a comprehensive evaluation of 22 gridded (quasi-)global (sub-)daily precipitation (<i>P</i>) datasets for the period 2000–2016. Thirteen non-gauge-corrected <i>P</i> datasets were evaluated using daily <i>P</i> gauge observations from 76 086 gauges...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. E. Beck, N. Vergopolan, M. Pan, V. Levizzani, A. I. J. M. van Dijk, G. P. Weedon, L. Brocca, F. Pappenberger, G. J. Huffman, E. F. Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-12-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/6201/2017/hess-21-6201-2017.pdf
id doaj-0267ddf272fc441aab133e6987039a74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0267ddf272fc441aab133e6987039a742020-11-25T02:02:22ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382017-12-01216201621710.5194/hess-21-6201-2017Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modelingH. E. Beck0N. Vergopolan1M. Pan2V. Levizzani3A. I. J. M. van Dijk4G. P. Weedon5L. Brocca6F. Pappenberger7G. J. Huffman8E. F. Wood9Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USANational Research Council of Italy, Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (CNR-ISAC), Bologna, ItalyFenner School of Environment & Society, The Australian National University, Canberra, AustraliaMet Office, Joint Centre for Hydro-Meteorological Research, Wallingford, UKResearch Institute for Geo-Hydrological Protection, National Research Council, Perugia, ItalyEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Shinfield Park, Reading, UKMesoscale Atmospheric Processes Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, USADepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USAWe undertook a comprehensive evaluation of 22 gridded (quasi-)global (sub-)daily precipitation (<i>P</i>) datasets for the period 2000–2016. Thirteen non-gauge-corrected <i>P</i> datasets were evaluated using daily <i>P</i> gauge observations from 76 086 gauges worldwide. Another nine gauge-corrected datasets were evaluated using hydrological modeling, by calibrating the HBV conceptual model against streamflow records for each of 9053 small to medium-sized ( &lt;  50 000 km<sup>2</sup>) catchments worldwide, and comparing the resulting performance. Marked differences in spatio-temporal patterns and accuracy were found among the datasets. Among the uncorrected <i>P</i> datasets, the satellite- and reanalysis-based MSWEP-ng V1.2 and V2.0 datasets generally showed the best temporal correlations with the gauge observations, followed by the reanalyses (ERA-Interim, JRA-55, and NCEP-CFSR) and the satellite- and reanalysis-based CHIRP V2.0 dataset, the estimates based primarily on passive microwave remote sensing of rainfall (CMORPH V1.0, GSMaP V5/6, and TMPA 3B42RT V7) or near-surface soil moisture (SM2RAIN-ASCAT), and finally, estimates based primarily on thermal infrared imagery (GridSat V1.0, PERSIANN, and PERSIANN-CCS). Two of the three reanalyses (ERA-Interim and JRA-55) unexpectedly obtained lower trend errors than the satellite datasets. Among the corrected <i>P</i> datasets, the ones directly incorporating daily gauge data (CPC Unified, and MSWEP V1.2 and V2.0) generally provided the best calibration scores, although the good performance of the fully gauge-based CPC Unified is unlikely to translate to sparsely or ungauged regions. Next best results were obtained with <i>P</i> estimates directly incorporating temporally coarser gauge data (CHIRPS V2.0, GPCP-1DD V1.2, TMPA 3B42 V7, and WFDEI-CRU), which in turn outperformed the one indirectly incorporating gauge data through another multi-source dataset (PERSIANN-CDR V1R1). Our results highlight large differences in estimation accuracy, and hence the importance of <i>P</i> dataset selection in both research and operational applications. The good performance of MSWEP emphasizes that careful data merging can exploit the complementary strengths of gauge-, satellite-, and reanalysis-based <i>P</i> estimates.https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/6201/2017/hess-21-6201-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. E. Beck
N. Vergopolan
M. Pan
V. Levizzani
A. I. J. M. van Dijk
G. P. Weedon
L. Brocca
F. Pappenberger
G. J. Huffman
E. F. Wood
spellingShingle H. E. Beck
N. Vergopolan
M. Pan
V. Levizzani
A. I. J. M. van Dijk
G. P. Weedon
L. Brocca
F. Pappenberger
G. J. Huffman
E. F. Wood
Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
author_facet H. E. Beck
N. Vergopolan
M. Pan
V. Levizzani
A. I. J. M. van Dijk
G. P. Weedon
L. Brocca
F. Pappenberger
G. J. Huffman
E. F. Wood
author_sort H. E. Beck
title Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
title_short Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
title_full Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
title_fullStr Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
title_full_unstemmed Global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
title_sort global-scale evaluation of 22 precipitation datasets using gauge observations and hydrological modeling
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
publishDate 2017-12-01
description We undertook a comprehensive evaluation of 22 gridded (quasi-)global (sub-)daily precipitation (<i>P</i>) datasets for the period 2000–2016. Thirteen non-gauge-corrected <i>P</i> datasets were evaluated using daily <i>P</i> gauge observations from 76 086 gauges worldwide. Another nine gauge-corrected datasets were evaluated using hydrological modeling, by calibrating the HBV conceptual model against streamflow records for each of 9053 small to medium-sized ( &lt;  50 000 km<sup>2</sup>) catchments worldwide, and comparing the resulting performance. Marked differences in spatio-temporal patterns and accuracy were found among the datasets. Among the uncorrected <i>P</i> datasets, the satellite- and reanalysis-based MSWEP-ng V1.2 and V2.0 datasets generally showed the best temporal correlations with the gauge observations, followed by the reanalyses (ERA-Interim, JRA-55, and NCEP-CFSR) and the satellite- and reanalysis-based CHIRP V2.0 dataset, the estimates based primarily on passive microwave remote sensing of rainfall (CMORPH V1.0, GSMaP V5/6, and TMPA 3B42RT V7) or near-surface soil moisture (SM2RAIN-ASCAT), and finally, estimates based primarily on thermal infrared imagery (GridSat V1.0, PERSIANN, and PERSIANN-CCS). Two of the three reanalyses (ERA-Interim and JRA-55) unexpectedly obtained lower trend errors than the satellite datasets. Among the corrected <i>P</i> datasets, the ones directly incorporating daily gauge data (CPC Unified, and MSWEP V1.2 and V2.0) generally provided the best calibration scores, although the good performance of the fully gauge-based CPC Unified is unlikely to translate to sparsely or ungauged regions. Next best results were obtained with <i>P</i> estimates directly incorporating temporally coarser gauge data (CHIRPS V2.0, GPCP-1DD V1.2, TMPA 3B42 V7, and WFDEI-CRU), which in turn outperformed the one indirectly incorporating gauge data through another multi-source dataset (PERSIANN-CDR V1R1). Our results highlight large differences in estimation accuracy, and hence the importance of <i>P</i> dataset selection in both research and operational applications. The good performance of MSWEP emphasizes that careful data merging can exploit the complementary strengths of gauge-, satellite-, and reanalysis-based <i>P</i> estimates.
url https://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/21/6201/2017/hess-21-6201-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hebeck globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT nvergopolan globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT mpan globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT vlevizzani globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT aijmvandijk globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT gpweedon globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT lbrocca globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT fpappenberger globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT gjhuffman globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
AT efwood globalscaleevaluationof22precipitationdatasetsusinggaugeobservationsandhydrologicalmodeling
_version_ 1724953355168514048