Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages

Introduction: Under short stretch bandages (SSB), the pressures drop over time. These pressures are documented in non standardized-way and vary from one study to another. Objective: A standardized stress test on a treadmill should help to better understand this evolution and thus to document with mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ravul Jindal, Florence Balet, Pascal Filori, Taranvir Kaur, Shabjot Dhillon, Shiwangi Thapa, Piyush Chaudhary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=4;spage=385;epage=388;aulast=Jindal
id doaj-026a7c43ff0641abbcdec04aabf2a80a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-026a7c43ff0641abbcdec04aabf2a80a2021-01-08T03:34:58ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery0972-08202394-09992020-01-017438538810.4103/ijves.ijves_37_20Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandagesRavul JindalFlorence BaletPascal FiloriTaranvir KaurShabjot DhillonShiwangi ThapaPiyush ChaudharyIntroduction: Under short stretch bandages (SSB), the pressures drop over time. These pressures are documented in non standardized-way and vary from one study to another. Objective: A standardized stress test on a treadmill should help to better understand this evolution and thus to document with more precision the behavior of 3 bandages in use. Materials and Methods: Three bandage kits (Urgo K2, Kit Biflex and a kit consisting of padding + 2 cotton SSB2 were tested in 30 subjects (60 legs) before and after a treadmill test (3 km/h, 6% slope for 30 min or 1.5 km). Results: Before the test, the bandages were applied with nonsignificantly different resting interface pressures (respectively 40.58 ± 2.7 mmHg, 41.05 ± 2.17 mmHg, 38.16 ± 2.98 mmHg). When standing, the pressures were significantly different between Urgo K2, Kit Biflex and SSB2(55.58 ± 6.15 mmHg, 57.3 ± 6.53 mmHg versus 62.3 ± 5.07 mmHg for SSB2). Similarly, the static stiffness indexes (SSI) showed significant differences (15 ± 5.05mmHg and 16.25 ± 6.28 mmHg versus 24.13 ± 4.65 mmHg for SSB2). After the test, resting pressures drop but more significantly under the SSB2 compared to the other 2 multilayer bandages (resting pressures: 31.95 ± 2.66 mmHg and 34.61 ± 2.28 mmHg vs. 25.95 ± 3.15 mmHg for SSB2). However, the SSI is not significantly different from the SSI calculated before the treadmill test (15.41 ± 4.44 mmHg and 15.66 ± 4.85 mmHg vs. 25.06 ± 4.98 mmHg). Conclusions: The treadmill test makes it possible to quantify and to compare the drop in pressure under different bandages in the same conditions. This test could be useful in clinical research before the clinical phases of development, especially in the case of venous leg ulcer. On the other hand, in case of mixed ulcers, the drop in pressure in lying position in multilayer bandages ensure a continuation of the arterial influx in case of mixed ulcers.http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=4;spage=385;epage=388;aulast=Jindalcompression bandagesinterface pressurestiffnesstreadmill test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ravul Jindal
Florence Balet
Pascal Filori
Taranvir Kaur
Shabjot Dhillon
Shiwangi Thapa
Piyush Chaudhary
spellingShingle Ravul Jindal
Florence Balet
Pascal Filori
Taranvir Kaur
Shabjot Dhillon
Shiwangi Thapa
Piyush Chaudhary
Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages
Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
compression bandages
interface pressure
stiffness
treadmill test
author_facet Ravul Jindal
Florence Balet
Pascal Filori
Taranvir Kaur
Shabjot Dhillon
Shiwangi Thapa
Piyush Chaudhary
author_sort Ravul Jindal
title Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages
title_short Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages
title_full Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages
title_fullStr Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages
title_full_unstemmed Interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages
title_sort interest of a standardized treadmill test to evaluate pressure drops and stiffness indices under short stretch bandages
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
issn 0972-0820
2394-0999
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Introduction: Under short stretch bandages (SSB), the pressures drop over time. These pressures are documented in non standardized-way and vary from one study to another. Objective: A standardized stress test on a treadmill should help to better understand this evolution and thus to document with more precision the behavior of 3 bandages in use. Materials and Methods: Three bandage kits (Urgo K2, Kit Biflex and a kit consisting of padding + 2 cotton SSB2 were tested in 30 subjects (60 legs) before and after a treadmill test (3 km/h, 6% slope for 30 min or 1.5 km). Results: Before the test, the bandages were applied with nonsignificantly different resting interface pressures (respectively 40.58 ± 2.7 mmHg, 41.05 ± 2.17 mmHg, 38.16 ± 2.98 mmHg). When standing, the pressures were significantly different between Urgo K2, Kit Biflex and SSB2(55.58 ± 6.15 mmHg, 57.3 ± 6.53 mmHg versus 62.3 ± 5.07 mmHg for SSB2). Similarly, the static stiffness indexes (SSI) showed significant differences (15 ± 5.05mmHg and 16.25 ± 6.28 mmHg versus 24.13 ± 4.65 mmHg for SSB2). After the test, resting pressures drop but more significantly under the SSB2 compared to the other 2 multilayer bandages (resting pressures: 31.95 ± 2.66 mmHg and 34.61 ± 2.28 mmHg vs. 25.95 ± 3.15 mmHg for SSB2). However, the SSI is not significantly different from the SSI calculated before the treadmill test (15.41 ± 4.44 mmHg and 15.66 ± 4.85 mmHg vs. 25.06 ± 4.98 mmHg). Conclusions: The treadmill test makes it possible to quantify and to compare the drop in pressure under different bandages in the same conditions. This test could be useful in clinical research before the clinical phases of development, especially in the case of venous leg ulcer. On the other hand, in case of mixed ulcers, the drop in pressure in lying position in multilayer bandages ensure a continuation of the arterial influx in case of mixed ulcers.
topic compression bandages
interface pressure
stiffness
treadmill test
url http://www.indjvascsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0972-0820;year=2020;volume=7;issue=4;spage=385;epage=388;aulast=Jindal
work_keys_str_mv AT ravuljindal interestofastandardizedtreadmilltesttoevaluatepressuredropsandstiffnessindicesundershortstretchbandages
AT florencebalet interestofastandardizedtreadmilltesttoevaluatepressuredropsandstiffnessindicesundershortstretchbandages
AT pascalfilori interestofastandardizedtreadmilltesttoevaluatepressuredropsandstiffnessindicesundershortstretchbandages
AT taranvirkaur interestofastandardizedtreadmilltesttoevaluatepressuredropsandstiffnessindicesundershortstretchbandages
AT shabjotdhillon interestofastandardizedtreadmilltesttoevaluatepressuredropsandstiffnessindicesundershortstretchbandages
AT shiwangithapa interestofastandardizedtreadmilltesttoevaluatepressuredropsandstiffnessindicesundershortstretchbandages
AT piyushchaudhary interestofastandardizedtreadmilltesttoevaluatepressuredropsandstiffnessindicesundershortstretchbandages
_version_ 1724345188463149056