Legal formalism: a comparison between Jori and Schauer
This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend leg...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
2017-11-01
|
| Series: | Derecho PUCP |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechopucp/article/view/19315 |
| Summary: | This essay examines and juxtaposes Mario Jori’s and Frederick Schauer’s ideas on legal formalism. Although developed independently of each other, these ideas show remarkable similarities: both focus on the notion of norm or rule as a tool for clarifying the notion of legal formalism; both defend legal formalism from the criticisms routinely moved against it. The author maintains that Jori’s and Schauer’s theories may contribute to shed light on (and criticize) the controversial notion of defeasibility of legal rules; they may also contribute to scale down, from a legal-theoretical point of view, the novelties of contemporary constitutional orders; finally, it may help to better understand their working machinery. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0251-3420 2305-2546 |