Forward Flux Sampling of Polymer Desorption Paths from a Solid Surface into Dilute Solution

We compute desorption rates for isolated polymers adsorbed to a solid wall with a rare event sampling technique called multilevel splitting, also known as forward flux sampling. We interpret computed rates with theories based on the conjecture that the product tdesDRg2 of the desorption time tdes an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyle J. Huston, Christina E. Rice, Ronald G. Larson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Polymers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/10/2275
Description
Summary:We compute desorption rates for isolated polymers adsorbed to a solid wall with a rare event sampling technique called multilevel splitting, also known as forward flux sampling. We interpret computed rates with theories based on the conjecture that the product tdesDRg2 of the desorption time tdes and diffusivity D divided by squared radius of gyration Rg scales with exp(<i>h/</i><i>R</i><sub>g</sub>) where <i>h</i> is the equilibrium ratio of adsorbed surface concentration of polymer Γ to bulk concentration of polymer c. As the polymer–wall interaction energy is increased, the slope of lntdesDRg2 vs. NVMFkBT nearly approaches unity, as expected for strongly-adsorbing chains, where <i>N</i> is the degree of polymerization and VMF is the height-averaged monomer–wall interaction energy for a strongly adsorbed chain. However, we also find that this scaling law is only accurate when adsorption strength per monomer exceeds a threshold value on the order of 0.3–0.5 k<sub>B</sub>T for a freely jointed chain without or with excluded volume effects. Below the critical value, we observe that tdesDRg2 becomes nearly constant with N, so that tdes∝Nα, with α≈2. This suggests a crossover from “strong” detachment-controlled to a “weak” diffusion-controlled desorption rate as V<sub>MF</sub>/k<sub>B</sub>T drops below some threshold. These results may partially explain experimental data, that in some cases show “strong” exponential dependence of desorption time on chain length, while in others a “weak” power-law dependence is found. However, in the “strong” adsorption case, our results suggest much longer desorption times than those measured, while the reverse is true in the weak adsorption limit. We discuss possible reasons for these discrepancies.
ISSN:2073-4360