An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response

Abstract Background The use of targeted therapy remains a treatment consideration for some patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, supportive data on the use of targeted therapy approaches are limited. Thus, we sought to evaluate the responsiveness of targeted agents in patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd C. Knepper, Robyn A. Panchaud, Elnara Muradova, Leah Cohen, James A. DeCaprio, Nikhil I. Khushalani, Kenneth Y. Tsai, Andrew S. Brohl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-09-01
Series:Cancer Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4138
id doaj-03143699f2cc4cb1b346c3d03f6e54ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03143699f2cc4cb1b346c3d03f6e54ed2021-09-06T09:17:13ZengWileyCancer Medicine2045-76342021-09-0110175889589610.1002/cam4.4138An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of responseTodd C. Knepper0Robyn A. Panchaud1Elnara Muradova2Leah Cohen3James A. DeCaprio4Nikhil I. Khushalani5Kenneth Y. Tsai6Andrew S. Brohl7Department of Individualized Cancer Management H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USADepartment of Anatomic Pathology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USADepartment of Anatomic Pathology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USADepartment of Anatomic Pathology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USADepartment of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston MA USADepartment of Cutaneous Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USADepartment of Anatomic Pathology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USADepartment of Cutaneous Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa FL USAAbstract Background The use of targeted therapy remains a treatment consideration for some patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, supportive data on the use of targeted therapy approaches are limited. Thus, we sought to evaluate the responsiveness of targeted agents in patients with advanced MCC. Methods An institutional MCC database identified patients who were treated with targeted therapy. For the purpose of this study, targeted therapy was defined as any multi‐targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor or inhibitor of the PI3K‐pathway. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. A subset of patient samples underwent next‐generation sequencing (NGS), Merkel cell polyomavirus testing, and PD‐L1/PD‐1 expression testing. Results Nineteen patients with MCC treated with targeted therapy were identified, 21 targeted therapy regimens were evaluable for response in 18 patients. Four of twenty‐one (19%) of evaluable regimens were associated with clinical benefit with the best overall response of SD. The durations of SD were 13.6 months (59 weeks), 9.7 months (42 weeks), 7.6 months (33 weeks), and 7.2 months (31 weeks). Of the four patients who derived clinical benefit, three were treated with pazopanib alone and one was treated with pazopanib plus everolimus. No difference in the rate of clinical benefit between molecular disease subtypes was detected nor was associated with any specific genomic alteration. Conclusion In our series, targeted agents elicited a disease control rate of 19% in patients with advanced MCC, with a best overall response of SD. Pazopanib alone or in combination exhibited a rate of disease control of 36% (4 of 11 with SD ≥6 months).https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4138genomicsimmune checkpoint inhibitor therapyMerkel cell carcinomaMerkel cell polyomavirusnext‐generation sequencing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Todd C. Knepper
Robyn A. Panchaud
Elnara Muradova
Leah Cohen
James A. DeCaprio
Nikhil I. Khushalani
Kenneth Y. Tsai
Andrew S. Brohl
spellingShingle Todd C. Knepper
Robyn A. Panchaud
Elnara Muradova
Leah Cohen
James A. DeCaprio
Nikhil I. Khushalani
Kenneth Y. Tsai
Andrew S. Brohl
An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response
Cancer Medicine
genomics
immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Merkel cell carcinoma
Merkel cell polyomavirus
next‐generation sequencing
author_facet Todd C. Knepper
Robyn A. Panchaud
Elnara Muradova
Leah Cohen
James A. DeCaprio
Nikhil I. Khushalani
Kenneth Y. Tsai
Andrew S. Brohl
author_sort Todd C. Knepper
title An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response
title_short An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response
title_full An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response
title_fullStr An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response
title_sort analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response
publisher Wiley
series Cancer Medicine
issn 2045-7634
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background The use of targeted therapy remains a treatment consideration for some patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, supportive data on the use of targeted therapy approaches are limited. Thus, we sought to evaluate the responsiveness of targeted agents in patients with advanced MCC. Methods An institutional MCC database identified patients who were treated with targeted therapy. For the purpose of this study, targeted therapy was defined as any multi‐targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor or inhibitor of the PI3K‐pathway. Clinical benefit was defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. A subset of patient samples underwent next‐generation sequencing (NGS), Merkel cell polyomavirus testing, and PD‐L1/PD‐1 expression testing. Results Nineteen patients with MCC treated with targeted therapy were identified, 21 targeted therapy regimens were evaluable for response in 18 patients. Four of twenty‐one (19%) of evaluable regimens were associated with clinical benefit with the best overall response of SD. The durations of SD were 13.6 months (59 weeks), 9.7 months (42 weeks), 7.6 months (33 weeks), and 7.2 months (31 weeks). Of the four patients who derived clinical benefit, three were treated with pazopanib alone and one was treated with pazopanib plus everolimus. No difference in the rate of clinical benefit between molecular disease subtypes was detected nor was associated with any specific genomic alteration. Conclusion In our series, targeted agents elicited a disease control rate of 19% in patients with advanced MCC, with a best overall response of SD. Pazopanib alone or in combination exhibited a rate of disease control of 36% (4 of 11 with SD ≥6 months).
topic genomics
immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Merkel cell carcinoma
Merkel cell polyomavirus
next‐generation sequencing
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4138
work_keys_str_mv AT toddcknepper ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT robynapanchaud ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT elnaramuradova ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT leahcohen ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT jamesadecaprio ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT nikhilikhushalani ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT kennethytsai ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT andrewsbrohl ananalysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT toddcknepper analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT robynapanchaud analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT elnaramuradova analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT leahcohen analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT jamesadecaprio analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT nikhilikhushalani analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT kennethytsai analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
AT andrewsbrohl analysisoftheuseoftargetedtherapiesinpatientswithadvancedmerkelcellcarcinomaandanevaluationofgenomiccorrelatesofresponse
_version_ 1717779782994755584