An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design Research
This paper investigates the integration of content, context and process (CCP) into the Action Design Research (ADR) framework to account for the interplay of organisational issues in artefact design and development. The investigation is conducted through a case study in which successive ICT student...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Australasian Association for Information Systems
2016-11-01
|
Series: | Australasian Journal of Information Systems |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1280 |
id |
doaj-0345c0ab531847ac80e7a2e421cca9f6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0345c0ab531847ac80e7a2e421cca9f62021-08-02T05:04:10ZengAustralasian Association for Information SystemsAustralasian Journal of Information Systems1449-86181449-86182016-11-0120010.3127/ajis.v20i0.1280601An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design ResearchDale MacKrell0Craig McDonald1University of CanberraUniversity of CanberraThis paper investigates the integration of content, context and process (CCP) into the Action Design Research (ADR) framework to account for the interplay of organisational issues in artefact design and development. The investigation is conducted through a case study in which successive ICT student teams incrementally build, over several semesters, a tailored, low cost business intelligence (BI) system as an ensemble artefact for an organisation in the not-for-profit (NFP) sector. During project development, CCP’s human-centred approach to evaluation complements ADR’s more prescribed technology-driven software testing. The integration of CCP into ADR as an evaluation view offers an holistic approach to assessing an ensemble artefact. The resultant conceptual framework is presented as a model with an explication of unexpected design and research outcomes.http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1280action design researchaction researchdesign scienceevaluationqualitativenot-for-profit |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dale MacKrell Craig McDonald |
spellingShingle |
Dale MacKrell Craig McDonald An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design Research Australasian Journal of Information Systems action design research action research design science evaluation qualitative not-for-profit |
author_facet |
Dale MacKrell Craig McDonald |
author_sort |
Dale MacKrell |
title |
An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design Research |
title_short |
An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design Research |
title_full |
An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design Research |
title_fullStr |
An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Evaluation View of an Ensemble Artefact for Decision Support using Action Design Research |
title_sort |
evaluation view of an ensemble artefact for decision support using action design research |
publisher |
Australasian Association for Information Systems |
series |
Australasian Journal of Information Systems |
issn |
1449-8618 1449-8618 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
This paper investigates the integration of content, context and process (CCP) into the Action Design Research (ADR) framework to account for the interplay of organisational issues in artefact design and development. The investigation is conducted through a case study in which successive ICT student teams incrementally build, over several semesters, a tailored, low cost business intelligence (BI) system as an ensemble artefact for an organisation in the not-for-profit (NFP) sector. During project development, CCP’s human-centred approach to evaluation complements ADR’s more prescribed technology-driven software testing. The integration of CCP into ADR as an evaluation view offers an holistic approach to assessing an ensemble artefact. The resultant conceptual framework is presented as a model with an explication of unexpected design and research outcomes. |
topic |
action design research action research design science evaluation qualitative not-for-profit |
url |
http://journal.acs.org.au/index.php/ajis/article/view/1280 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dalemackrell anevaluationviewofanensembleartefactfordecisionsupportusingactiondesignresearch AT craigmcdonald anevaluationviewofanensembleartefactfordecisionsupportusingactiondesignresearch AT dalemackrell evaluationviewofanensembleartefactfordecisionsupportusingactiondesignresearch AT craigmcdonald evaluationviewofanensembleartefactfordecisionsupportusingactiondesignresearch |
_version_ |
1721241549373702144 |