Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.

Changes in urban residential density represent an important issue in terms of land consumption, the conservation of ecosystems, air quality and related human health problems, as well as the consequential challenges for urban and regional planning. It is the decline of residential densities, in parti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Wolff, Dagmar Haase, Annegret Haase
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5830312?pdf=render
id doaj-034f9da9b46e44f6a75c45d09a9d6c79
record_format Article
spelling doaj-034f9da9b46e44f6a75c45d09a9d6c792020-11-25T02:10:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019232610.1371/journal.pone.0192326Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.Manuel WolffDagmar HaaseAnnegret HaaseChanges in urban residential density represent an important issue in terms of land consumption, the conservation of ecosystems, air quality and related human health problems, as well as the consequential challenges for urban and regional planning. It is the decline of residential densities, in particular, that has often been used as the very definition of sprawl, describing a phenomenon that has been extensively studied in the United States and in Western Europe. Whilst these studies provide valuable insights into urbanization processes, only a handful of them have reflected the uneven dynamics of simultaneous urban growth and shrinkage, using residential density changes as a key indicator to uncover the underlying dynamics. This paper introduces a contrasting analysis of recent developments in both de- and re-concentration, defined as decreasing or increasing residential densities, respectively. Using a large sample of European cities, it detects differences in density changes between successional population growth/decline. The paper shows that dedensification, found in some large cities globally, is not a universal phenomenon in growing urban areas; neither the increasing disproportion between a declining demand for and an increasing supply of residential areas nor actual concentration processes in cities were found. Thus, the paper provides a new, very detailed perspective on (de)densification in both shrinking and growing cities and how they specifically contribute to current land take in Europe.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5830312?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Manuel Wolff
Dagmar Haase
Annegret Haase
spellingShingle Manuel Wolff
Dagmar Haase
Annegret Haase
Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Manuel Wolff
Dagmar Haase
Annegret Haase
author_sort Manuel Wolff
title Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.
title_short Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.
title_full Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.
title_fullStr Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.
title_full_unstemmed Compact or spread? A quantitative spatial model of urban areas in Europe since 1990.
title_sort compact or spread? a quantitative spatial model of urban areas in europe since 1990.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Changes in urban residential density represent an important issue in terms of land consumption, the conservation of ecosystems, air quality and related human health problems, as well as the consequential challenges for urban and regional planning. It is the decline of residential densities, in particular, that has often been used as the very definition of sprawl, describing a phenomenon that has been extensively studied in the United States and in Western Europe. Whilst these studies provide valuable insights into urbanization processes, only a handful of them have reflected the uneven dynamics of simultaneous urban growth and shrinkage, using residential density changes as a key indicator to uncover the underlying dynamics. This paper introduces a contrasting analysis of recent developments in both de- and re-concentration, defined as decreasing or increasing residential densities, respectively. Using a large sample of European cities, it detects differences in density changes between successional population growth/decline. The paper shows that dedensification, found in some large cities globally, is not a universal phenomenon in growing urban areas; neither the increasing disproportion between a declining demand for and an increasing supply of residential areas nor actual concentration processes in cities were found. Thus, the paper provides a new, very detailed perspective on (de)densification in both shrinking and growing cities and how they specifically contribute to current land take in Europe.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5830312?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelwolff compactorspreadaquantitativespatialmodelofurbanareasineuropesince1990
AT dagmarhaase compactorspreadaquantitativespatialmodelofurbanareasineuropesince1990
AT annegrethaase compactorspreadaquantitativespatialmodelofurbanareasineuropesince1990
_version_ 1724918344625160192