Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy
Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has significantly improved management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A significant number of patients have a dramatic response and have been termed “super-responders”. The characteristics of this subset of pa...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Indian Heart Journal |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483219304134 |
id |
doaj-035c4a92e8e04da8b88ada17cfb316af |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-035c4a92e8e04da8b88ada17cfb316af2020-11-25T01:35:07ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322019-07-01714334337Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapyManoj Kumar Rohit0Darshan Krishnappa1Department of Cardiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IndiaDepartment of Cardiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India; Cardiovascular Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Corresponding author.Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has significantly improved management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A significant number of patients have a dramatic response and have been termed “super-responders”. The characteristics of this subset of patients in Indian and Asian population have not been well studied. In this study, we sought to assess the prevalence and clinical characteristics of this cohort of patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving patients undergoing CRT. Changes in ejection fraction and LVESV at the end of one year of follow-up following device implantation were assessed, and patients were stratified into non-responders, responders, and super-responders. Responders had a 15–29% decrease in LVESV while super-responders had a >30% decrease in LVESV. Results: Of the 74 patients who had undergone CRT-P/CRT-D implantation, 16 patients did not have echocardiograms at the end of one year of follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. Thus, 58 patients were enrolled for analysis. We identified 16 patients (27.6%) to be super-responders, 26 patients (44.8%) to be responders, and 16 patients (27.6%) to be non-responders. Factors associated with a super-response were a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy as against ischemic cardiomyopathy (93.7% vs 6.3%; p – 0.01), prior right ventricular (RV) apical pacing (25% vs 2.4%; p – 0.02) and absence of a prior history of myocardial infarction (MI) (0% vs 33.3%; p – 0.02). Conclusion: In our study, 27.6% of patients were super-responders, and a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy, absence of a prior history of MI and prior RV apical pacing predicted a super-response to CRT. Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Super-responders, HFrEFhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483219304134 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Manoj Kumar Rohit Darshan Krishnappa |
spellingShingle |
Manoj Kumar Rohit Darshan Krishnappa Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy Indian Heart Journal |
author_facet |
Manoj Kumar Rohit Darshan Krishnappa |
author_sort |
Manoj Kumar Rohit |
title |
Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_short |
Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full |
Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_fullStr |
Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
title_sort |
incidence and predictors of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Indian Heart Journal |
issn |
0019-4832 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Objectives: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has significantly improved management of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A significant number of patients have a dramatic response and have been termed “super-responders”. The characteristics of this subset of patients in Indian and Asian population have not been well studied. In this study, we sought to assess the prevalence and clinical characteristics of this cohort of patients. Methods: This was a retrospective study involving patients undergoing CRT. Changes in ejection fraction and LVESV at the end of one year of follow-up following device implantation were assessed, and patients were stratified into non-responders, responders, and super-responders. Responders had a 15–29% decrease in LVESV while super-responders had a >30% decrease in LVESV. Results: Of the 74 patients who had undergone CRT-P/CRT-D implantation, 16 patients did not have echocardiograms at the end of one year of follow-up and were excluded from the analysis. Thus, 58 patients were enrolled for analysis. We identified 16 patients (27.6%) to be super-responders, 26 patients (44.8%) to be responders, and 16 patients (27.6%) to be non-responders. Factors associated with a super-response were a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy as against ischemic cardiomyopathy (93.7% vs 6.3%; p – 0.01), prior right ventricular (RV) apical pacing (25% vs 2.4%; p – 0.02) and absence of a prior history of myocardial infarction (MI) (0% vs 33.3%; p – 0.02). Conclusion: In our study, 27.6% of patients were super-responders, and a diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy, absence of a prior history of MI and prior RV apical pacing predicted a super-response to CRT. Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Super-responders, HFrEF |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483219304134 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT manojkumarrohit incidenceandpredictorsofsuperresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapy AT darshankrishnappa incidenceandpredictorsofsuperresponsetocardiacresynchronizationtherapy |
_version_ |
1725068415052283904 |