Stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global Network
Abstract Background Stillbirth rates are high and represent a substantial proportion of the under-5 mortality in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, where nearly 98% of stillbirths worldwide occur, few population-based studies have documented cause of stillbirths or the trends in rate o...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Reproductive Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00991-y |
id |
doaj-036d476a1fff4b9f9de33d71a9149d76 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elizabeth M. McClure Sarah Saleem Shivaprasad S. Goudar Ana Garces Ryan Whitworth Fabian Esamai Archana B. Patel Shiyam Sunder Tikmani Musaku Mwenechanya Elwyn Chomba Adrien Lokangaka Carl L. Bose Sherri Bucher Edward A. Liechty Nancy F. Krebs S. Yogesh Kumar Richard J. Derman Patricia L. Hibberd Waldemar A. Carlo Janet L. Moore Tracy L. Nolen Marion Koso-Thomas Robert L. Goldenberg |
spellingShingle |
Elizabeth M. McClure Sarah Saleem Shivaprasad S. Goudar Ana Garces Ryan Whitworth Fabian Esamai Archana B. Patel Shiyam Sunder Tikmani Musaku Mwenechanya Elwyn Chomba Adrien Lokangaka Carl L. Bose Sherri Bucher Edward A. Liechty Nancy F. Krebs S. Yogesh Kumar Richard J. Derman Patricia L. Hibberd Waldemar A. Carlo Janet L. Moore Tracy L. Nolen Marion Koso-Thomas Robert L. Goldenberg Stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global Network Reproductive Health Stillbirth Low-middle income countries Obstetric care Global Network |
author_facet |
Elizabeth M. McClure Sarah Saleem Shivaprasad S. Goudar Ana Garces Ryan Whitworth Fabian Esamai Archana B. Patel Shiyam Sunder Tikmani Musaku Mwenechanya Elwyn Chomba Adrien Lokangaka Carl L. Bose Sherri Bucher Edward A. Liechty Nancy F. Krebs S. Yogesh Kumar Richard J. Derman Patricia L. Hibberd Waldemar A. Carlo Janet L. Moore Tracy L. Nolen Marion Koso-Thomas Robert L. Goldenberg |
author_sort |
Elizabeth M. McClure |
title |
Stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global Network |
title_short |
Stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global Network |
title_full |
Stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global Network |
title_fullStr |
Stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global Network |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global Network |
title_sort |
stillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the global network |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Reproductive Health |
issn |
1742-4755 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Stillbirth rates are high and represent a substantial proportion of the under-5 mortality in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, where nearly 98% of stillbirths worldwide occur, few population-based studies have documented cause of stillbirths or the trends in rate of stillbirth over time. Methods We undertook a prospective, population-based multi-country research study of all pregnant women in defined geographic areas across 7 sites in low-resource settings (Kenya, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala). Staff collected demographic and health care characteristics with outcomes obtained at delivery. Cause of stillbirth was assigned by algorithm. Results From 2010 through 2018, 573,148 women were enrolled with delivery data obtained. Of the 552,547 births that reached 500 g or 20 weeks gestation, 15,604 were stillbirths; a rate of 28.2 stillbirths per 1000 births. The stillbirth rates were 19.3 in the Guatemala site, 23.8 in the African sites, and 33.3 in the Asian sites. Specifically, stillbirth rates were highest in the Pakistan site, which also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirth rates over the study period, from 56.0 per 1000 (95% CI 51.0, 61.0) in 2010 to 44.4 per 1000 (95% CI 39.1, 49.7) in 2018. The Nagpur, India site also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirths from 32.5 (95% CI 29.0, 36.1) to 16.9 (95% CI 13.9, 19.9) per 1000 in 2018; however, other sites had only small declines in stillbirth over the same period. Women who were less educated and older as well as those with less access to antenatal care and with vaginal assisted delivery were at increased risk of stillbirth. The major fetal causes of stillbirth were birth asphyxia (44.0% of stillbirths) and infectious causes (22.2%). The maternal conditions that were observed among those with stillbirth were obstructed or prolonged labor, antepartum hemorrhage and maternal infections. Conclusions Over the study period, stillbirth rates have remained relatively high across all sites. With the exceptions of the Pakistan and Nagpur sites, Global Network sites did not observe substantial changes in their stillbirth rates. Women who were less educated and had less access to antenatal and obstetric care remained at the highest burden of stillbirth. Study registration Clinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT01073475). |
topic |
Stillbirth Low-middle income countries Obstetric care Global Network |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00991-y |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elizabethmmcclure stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT sarahsaleem stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT shivaprasadsgoudar stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT anagarces stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT ryanwhitworth stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT fabianesamai stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT archanabpatel stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT shiyamsundertikmani stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT musakumwenechanya stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT elwynchomba stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT adrienlokangaka stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT carllbose stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT sherribucher stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT edwardaliechty stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT nancyfkrebs stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT syogeshkumar stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT richardjderman stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT patricialhibberd stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT waldemaracarlo stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT janetlmoore stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT tracylnolen stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT marionkosothomas stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork AT robertlgoldenberg stillbirth20102018aprospectivepopulationbasedmulticountrystudyfromtheglobalnetwork |
_version_ |
1724398925707739136 |
spelling |
doaj-036d476a1fff4b9f9de33d71a9149d762020-12-06T12:20:44ZengBMCReproductive Health1742-47552020-11-0117S21910.1186/s12978-020-00991-yStillbirth 2010–2018: a prospective, population-based, multi-country study from the Global NetworkElizabeth M. McClure0Sarah Saleem1Shivaprasad S. Goudar2Ana Garces3Ryan Whitworth4Fabian Esamai5Archana B. Patel6Shiyam Sunder Tikmani7Musaku Mwenechanya8Elwyn Chomba9Adrien Lokangaka10Carl L. Bose11Sherri Bucher12Edward A. Liechty13Nancy F. Krebs14S. Yogesh Kumar15Richard J. Derman16Patricia L. Hibberd17Waldemar A. Carlo18Janet L. Moore19Tracy L. Nolen20Marion Koso-Thomas21Robert L. Goldenberg22Social, Statistical and Environmental Health Sciences, RTI InternationalAga Khan UniversityKLE Academy Higher Education and Research J N Medical College BelagaviInstituto de Nutrición de Centroamérica y PanamáSocial, Statistical and Environmental Health Sciences, RTI InternationalMoi University School of MedicineLata Medical Research FoundationAga Khan UniversityUniversity Teaching HospitalUniversity Teaching HospitalKinshasa School of Public HealthUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillIndiana School of Medicine, University of IndianaIndiana School of Medicine, University of IndianaUniversity of Colorado School of MedicineKLE Academy Higher Education and Research J N Medical College BelagaviThomas Jefferson UniversityBoston University School of Public HealthUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamSocial, Statistical and Environmental Health Sciences, RTI InternationalSocial, Statistical and Environmental Health Sciences, RTI InternationalEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University School of MedicineAbstract Background Stillbirth rates are high and represent a substantial proportion of the under-5 mortality in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). In LMIC, where nearly 98% of stillbirths worldwide occur, few population-based studies have documented cause of stillbirths or the trends in rate of stillbirth over time. Methods We undertook a prospective, population-based multi-country research study of all pregnant women in defined geographic areas across 7 sites in low-resource settings (Kenya, Zambia, Democratic Republic of Congo, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala). Staff collected demographic and health care characteristics with outcomes obtained at delivery. Cause of stillbirth was assigned by algorithm. Results From 2010 through 2018, 573,148 women were enrolled with delivery data obtained. Of the 552,547 births that reached 500 g or 20 weeks gestation, 15,604 were stillbirths; a rate of 28.2 stillbirths per 1000 births. The stillbirth rates were 19.3 in the Guatemala site, 23.8 in the African sites, and 33.3 in the Asian sites. Specifically, stillbirth rates were highest in the Pakistan site, which also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirth rates over the study period, from 56.0 per 1000 (95% CI 51.0, 61.0) in 2010 to 44.4 per 1000 (95% CI 39.1, 49.7) in 2018. The Nagpur, India site also documented a substantial decrease in stillbirths from 32.5 (95% CI 29.0, 36.1) to 16.9 (95% CI 13.9, 19.9) per 1000 in 2018; however, other sites had only small declines in stillbirth over the same period. Women who were less educated and older as well as those with less access to antenatal care and with vaginal assisted delivery were at increased risk of stillbirth. The major fetal causes of stillbirth were birth asphyxia (44.0% of stillbirths) and infectious causes (22.2%). The maternal conditions that were observed among those with stillbirth were obstructed or prolonged labor, antepartum hemorrhage and maternal infections. Conclusions Over the study period, stillbirth rates have remained relatively high across all sites. With the exceptions of the Pakistan and Nagpur sites, Global Network sites did not observe substantial changes in their stillbirth rates. Women who were less educated and had less access to antenatal and obstetric care remained at the highest burden of stillbirth. Study registration Clinicaltrials.gov (ID# NCT01073475).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00991-yStillbirthLow-middle income countriesObstetric careGlobal Network |