Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System

Digital technologies have provided governments across the world with new tools of political and social control. The development of algorithmic governance in China is particularly alarming, where plans have been released to develop a digital Social Credit System (SCS). Still in an exploratory stage,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sheng Zou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2021-04-01
Series:Media and Communication
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3806
id doaj-03a4be08e1444554885b7d5d8f68a035
record_format Article
spelling doaj-03a4be08e1444554885b7d5d8f68a0352021-04-06T10:35:26ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392021-04-019214014910.17645/mac.v9i2.38061933Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit SystemSheng Zou0International Institute, University of Michigan, USADigital technologies have provided governments across the world with new tools of political and social control. The development of algorithmic governance in China is particularly alarming, where plans have been released to develop a digital Social Credit System (SCS). Still in an exploratory stage, the SCS, as a collection of national and local pilots, is framed officially as an all-encompassing project aimed at building trust in society through the regulation of both economic and social behaviors. Grounded in the case of China’s SCS, this article interrogates the application of algorithmic rating to expanding areas of everyday life through the lens of the Frankfurt School’s critique of instrumental reason. It explores how the SCS reduces the moral and relational dimension of trust in social interactions, and how algorithmic technologies, thriving on a moral economy characterized by impersonality, impede the formation of trust and trustworthiness as moral virtues. The algorithmic rationality underlying the SCS undermines the ontology of relational trust, forecloses its transformative power, and disrupts social and civic interactions that are non-instrumental in nature. Re-reading and extending the Frankfurt School’s theorization on reason and the technological society, especially the works of Horkheimer, Marcuse, and Habermas, this article reflects on the limitations of algorithmic technologies in social governance. A Critical Theory perspective awakens us to the importance of human reflexivity on the use and circumscription of algorithmic rating systems.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3806algorithmic rationalityfrankfurt schoolinstrumental reasonsocial credit systemsocial governancetrust
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sheng Zou
spellingShingle Sheng Zou
Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System
Media and Communication
algorithmic rationality
frankfurt school
instrumental reason
social credit system
social governance
trust
author_facet Sheng Zou
author_sort Sheng Zou
title Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System
title_short Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System
title_full Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System
title_fullStr Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System
title_full_unstemmed Disenchanting Trust: Instrumental Reason, Algorithmic Governance, and China’s Emerging Social Credit System
title_sort disenchanting trust: instrumental reason, algorithmic governance, and china’s emerging social credit system
publisher Cogitatio
series Media and Communication
issn 2183-2439
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Digital technologies have provided governments across the world with new tools of political and social control. The development of algorithmic governance in China is particularly alarming, where plans have been released to develop a digital Social Credit System (SCS). Still in an exploratory stage, the SCS, as a collection of national and local pilots, is framed officially as an all-encompassing project aimed at building trust in society through the regulation of both economic and social behaviors. Grounded in the case of China’s SCS, this article interrogates the application of algorithmic rating to expanding areas of everyday life through the lens of the Frankfurt School’s critique of instrumental reason. It explores how the SCS reduces the moral and relational dimension of trust in social interactions, and how algorithmic technologies, thriving on a moral economy characterized by impersonality, impede the formation of trust and trustworthiness as moral virtues. The algorithmic rationality underlying the SCS undermines the ontology of relational trust, forecloses its transformative power, and disrupts social and civic interactions that are non-instrumental in nature. Re-reading and extending the Frankfurt School’s theorization on reason and the technological society, especially the works of Horkheimer, Marcuse, and Habermas, this article reflects on the limitations of algorithmic technologies in social governance. A Critical Theory perspective awakens us to the importance of human reflexivity on the use and circumscription of algorithmic rating systems.
topic algorithmic rationality
frankfurt school
instrumental reason
social credit system
social governance
trust
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3806
work_keys_str_mv AT shengzou disenchantingtrustinstrumentalreasonalgorithmicgovernanceandchinasemergingsocialcreditsystem
_version_ 1721538288520527872