Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?

Abstract Rotavirus (RV) diarrhea is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children worldwide and since 2006, vaccines have been available and recommended by WHO for use in all children. We developed protocols that countries could use to assess the burden of RV disease in their own countries an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roger I. Glass
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-11-01
Series:Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0126-7
id doaj-0426f6dc557d496e99cfb25251f8f910
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0426f6dc557d496e99cfb25251f8f9102020-11-25T02:02:27ZengBMCCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation1478-75472018-11-0116S11310.1186/s12962-018-0126-7Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?Roger I. Glass0Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of HealthAbstract Rotavirus (RV) diarrhea is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children worldwide and since 2006, vaccines have been available and recommended by WHO for use in all children. We developed protocols that countries could use to assess the burden of RV disease in their own countries and the cost-effectiveness of a program for vaccine introduction. A decade later and in the setting of extreme tiering of prices so that the poorest countries pay the least for the vaccine, more than 92 countries have introduced this vaccine into their national programs and more than 90 have not. Those countries that introduced determined by protocol that the burden of RV disease was substantial and the cost of vaccine reasonable, especially in low income settings where GAVI subsidizes the vaccines’ purchase. However, elsewhere, WHO's global recommendation has not been enacted leaving a majority of the world’s children still at risk of this severe and sometimes fatal disease. We remain with much to learn about how to encourage countries to make decisions that will improve the health of their own children.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0126-7RotavirusVaccinesVaccine hesitancyChildhood diarrhea
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roger I. Glass
spellingShingle Roger I. Glass
Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Rotavirus
Vaccines
Vaccine hesitancy
Childhood diarrhea
author_facet Roger I. Glass
author_sort Roger I. Glass
title Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
title_short Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
title_full Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
title_fullStr Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
title_full_unstemmed Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
title_sort priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
publisher BMC
series Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
issn 1478-7547
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Abstract Rotavirus (RV) diarrhea is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children worldwide and since 2006, vaccines have been available and recommended by WHO for use in all children. We developed protocols that countries could use to assess the burden of RV disease in their own countries and the cost-effectiveness of a program for vaccine introduction. A decade later and in the setting of extreme tiering of prices so that the poorest countries pay the least for the vaccine, more than 92 countries have introduced this vaccine into their national programs and more than 90 have not. Those countries that introduced determined by protocol that the burden of RV disease was substantial and the cost of vaccine reasonable, especially in low income settings where GAVI subsidizes the vaccines’ purchase. However, elsewhere, WHO's global recommendation has not been enacted leaving a majority of the world’s children still at risk of this severe and sometimes fatal disease. We remain with much to learn about how to encourage countries to make decisions that will improve the health of their own children.
topic Rotavirus
Vaccines
Vaccine hesitancy
Childhood diarrhea
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0126-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rogeriglass prioritysettingfortheintroductionofrotavirusvaccinewhatevidencewasessential
_version_ 1724952864449626112