Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?
Abstract Rotavirus (RV) diarrhea is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children worldwide and since 2006, vaccines have been available and recommended by WHO for use in all children. We developed protocols that countries could use to assess the burden of RV disease in their own countries an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0126-7 |
id |
doaj-0426f6dc557d496e99cfb25251f8f910 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0426f6dc557d496e99cfb25251f8f9102020-11-25T02:02:27ZengBMCCost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation1478-75472018-11-0116S11310.1186/s12962-018-0126-7Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential?Roger I. Glass0Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of HealthAbstract Rotavirus (RV) diarrhea is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children worldwide and since 2006, vaccines have been available and recommended by WHO for use in all children. We developed protocols that countries could use to assess the burden of RV disease in their own countries and the cost-effectiveness of a program for vaccine introduction. A decade later and in the setting of extreme tiering of prices so that the poorest countries pay the least for the vaccine, more than 92 countries have introduced this vaccine into their national programs and more than 90 have not. Those countries that introduced determined by protocol that the burden of RV disease was substantial and the cost of vaccine reasonable, especially in low income settings where GAVI subsidizes the vaccines’ purchase. However, elsewhere, WHO's global recommendation has not been enacted leaving a majority of the world’s children still at risk of this severe and sometimes fatal disease. We remain with much to learn about how to encourage countries to make decisions that will improve the health of their own children.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0126-7RotavirusVaccinesVaccine hesitancyChildhood diarrhea |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roger I. Glass |
spellingShingle |
Roger I. Glass Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential? Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation Rotavirus Vaccines Vaccine hesitancy Childhood diarrhea |
author_facet |
Roger I. Glass |
author_sort |
Roger I. Glass |
title |
Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential? |
title_short |
Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential? |
title_full |
Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential? |
title_fullStr |
Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential? |
title_sort |
priority setting for the introduction of rotavirus vaccine: what evidence was essential? |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation |
issn |
1478-7547 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Rotavirus (RV) diarrhea is the most common cause of severe diarrhea in children worldwide and since 2006, vaccines have been available and recommended by WHO for use in all children. We developed protocols that countries could use to assess the burden of RV disease in their own countries and the cost-effectiveness of a program for vaccine introduction. A decade later and in the setting of extreme tiering of prices so that the poorest countries pay the least for the vaccine, more than 92 countries have introduced this vaccine into their national programs and more than 90 have not. Those countries that introduced determined by protocol that the burden of RV disease was substantial and the cost of vaccine reasonable, especially in low income settings where GAVI subsidizes the vaccines’ purchase. However, elsewhere, WHO's global recommendation has not been enacted leaving a majority of the world’s children still at risk of this severe and sometimes fatal disease. We remain with much to learn about how to encourage countries to make decisions that will improve the health of their own children. |
topic |
Rotavirus Vaccines Vaccine hesitancy Childhood diarrhea |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12962-018-0126-7 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rogeriglass prioritysettingfortheintroductionofrotavirusvaccinewhatevidencewasessential |
_version_ |
1724952864449626112 |