Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis
The topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bas...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1070 |
id |
doaj-043b3b862d79411d9fda705373acbed6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-043b3b862d79411d9fda705373acbed62021-03-05T00:06:53ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-03-01101070107010.3390/jcm10051070Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy AnalysisAlexey Unkovskiy0Franziska Schmidt1Florian Beuer2Ping Li3Sebastian Spintzyk4Pablo Kraemer Fernandez5Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanySection Medical Materials Science and Technology, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tuebingen, GermanySection Medical Materials Science and Technology, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tuebingen, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics at the Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery with Dental School, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyThe topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bases were printed with SLA and DLP methods using three build angles: 0°, 45° and 90°. The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A heat map was generated to display the locations of the deviations within the intaglio surface. The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to DLP (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The 90° build angle may provide the best trueness for both SLA and DLP. With regard to precision, statistically significant differences were found in the build angles only. Higher precision was revealed in the DLP angle of 0° in comparison to the 45° and 90° angles.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1070stereolithographydirect light processingcomplete dentureedentulismrapid prototyping3D printing |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alexey Unkovskiy Franziska Schmidt Florian Beuer Ping Li Sebastian Spintzyk Pablo Kraemer Fernandez |
spellingShingle |
Alexey Unkovskiy Franziska Schmidt Florian Beuer Ping Li Sebastian Spintzyk Pablo Kraemer Fernandez Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis Journal of Clinical Medicine stereolithography direct light processing complete denture edentulism rapid prototyping 3D printing |
author_facet |
Alexey Unkovskiy Franziska Schmidt Florian Beuer Ping Li Sebastian Spintzyk Pablo Kraemer Fernandez |
author_sort |
Alexey Unkovskiy |
title |
Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis |
title_short |
Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis |
title_full |
Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis |
title_sort |
stereolithography vs. direct light processing for rapid manufacturing of complete denture bases: an in vitro accuracy analysis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
The topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bases were printed with SLA and DLP methods using three build angles: 0°, 45° and 90°. The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A heat map was generated to display the locations of the deviations within the intaglio surface. The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to DLP (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The 90° build angle may provide the best trueness for both SLA and DLP. With regard to precision, statistically significant differences were found in the build angles only. Higher precision was revealed in the DLP angle of 0° in comparison to the 45° and 90° angles. |
topic |
stereolithography direct light processing complete denture edentulism rapid prototyping 3D printing |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1070 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexeyunkovskiy stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis AT franziskaschmidt stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis AT florianbeuer stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis AT pingli stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis AT sebastianspintzyk stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis AT pablokraemerfernandez stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis |
_version_ |
1724231201306181632 |