Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis

The topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexey Unkovskiy, Franziska Schmidt, Florian Beuer, Ping Li, Sebastian Spintzyk, Pablo Kraemer Fernandez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1070
id doaj-043b3b862d79411d9fda705373acbed6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-043b3b862d79411d9fda705373acbed62021-03-05T00:06:53ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-03-01101070107010.3390/jcm10051070Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy AnalysisAlexey Unkovskiy0Franziska Schmidt1Florian Beuer2Ping Li3Sebastian Spintzyk4Pablo Kraemer Fernandez5Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt—Universität zu Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanySection Medical Materials Science and Technology, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tuebingen, GermanySection Medical Materials Science and Technology, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tuebingen, GermanyDepartment of Prosthodontics at the Centre of Dentistry, Oral Medicine and Maxillofacial Surgery with Dental School, Tuebingen University Hospital, Osianderstr. 2-8, 72076 Tübingen, GermanyThe topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bases were printed with SLA and DLP methods using three build angles: 0°, 45° and 90°. The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A heat map was generated to display the locations of the deviations within the intaglio surface. The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to DLP (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The 90° build angle may provide the best trueness for both SLA and DLP. With regard to precision, statistically significant differences were found in the build angles only. Higher precision was revealed in the DLP angle of 0° in comparison to the 45° and 90° angles.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1070stereolithographydirect light processingcomplete dentureedentulismrapid prototyping3D printing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexey Unkovskiy
Franziska Schmidt
Florian Beuer
Ping Li
Sebastian Spintzyk
Pablo Kraemer Fernandez
spellingShingle Alexey Unkovskiy
Franziska Schmidt
Florian Beuer
Ping Li
Sebastian Spintzyk
Pablo Kraemer Fernandez
Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis
Journal of Clinical Medicine
stereolithography
direct light processing
complete denture
edentulism
rapid prototyping
3D printing
author_facet Alexey Unkovskiy
Franziska Schmidt
Florian Beuer
Ping Li
Sebastian Spintzyk
Pablo Kraemer Fernandez
author_sort Alexey Unkovskiy
title Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis
title_short Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis
title_full Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis
title_fullStr Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis
title_sort stereolithography vs. direct light processing for rapid manufacturing of complete denture bases: an in vitro accuracy analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2021-03-01
description The topical literature lacks any comparison between stereolithography (SLA) and direct light processing (DLP) printing methods with regard to the accuracy of complete denture base fabrication, thereby utilizing materials certified for this purpose. In order to investigate this aspect, 15 denture bases were printed with SLA and DLP methods using three build angles: 0°, 45° and 90°. The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. A heat map was generated to display the locations of the deviations within the intaglio surface. The overall tendency indicated that SLA denture bases had significantly higher trueness for most build angles compared to DLP (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The 90° build angle may provide the best trueness for both SLA and DLP. With regard to precision, statistically significant differences were found in the build angles only. Higher precision was revealed in the DLP angle of 0° in comparison to the 45° and 90° angles.
topic stereolithography
direct light processing
complete denture
edentulism
rapid prototyping
3D printing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/5/1070
work_keys_str_mv AT alexeyunkovskiy stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis
AT franziskaschmidt stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis
AT florianbeuer stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis
AT pingli stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis
AT sebastianspintzyk stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis
AT pablokraemerfernandez stereolithographyvsdirectlightprocessingforrapidmanufacturingofcompletedenturebasesaninvitroaccuracyanalysis
_version_ 1724231201306181632