Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disease that commonly affects children, and usually worsens with age that often leads to permanent disability and death for many of the SMA patients. Recently, two drugs are developed to improving the quality of life of SMA sufferers: Evrysdi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhu Xiaoying
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/47/e3sconf_icepe2021_03035.pdf
id doaj-04761a9b487f4f9ca2b6209003d06175
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04761a9b487f4f9ca2b6209003d061752021-06-18T08:19:52ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422021-01-012710303510.1051/e3sconf/202127103035e3sconf_icepe2021_03035Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular AtrophyZhu Xiaoying0USC Master graduate, School of Pharmacy, Healthcare decision and analysisSpinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disease that commonly affects children, and usually worsens with age that often leads to permanent disability and death for many of the SMA patients. Recently, two drugs are developed to improving the quality of life of SMA sufferers: Evrysdi and Nusinersen. This study is identified by a systematic literature review to compare two treatments. The comparison attempts to focus on mechanism, administration and clinical trials. The trials include the ENDEAR study for Nusinersen, and the FIREFISH study for Evrysdi. Due to the different baselines of two trials, matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is used to “weighted” baseline characteristics to match each other across all the studies. Each of the trials highlighted the effectiveness for comparison. Both Nusinersen and Evrysdi have had a major and positive impact on improving the quality of life of SMA, and both therapies have been shown to be highly effective. Moreover, the indirect comparison with Matching Adjustment Indirect Comparison shows that Risdiplam is more effective as compared to Nusinersen. Nonetheless, the comparison is still inaccurate due to lack of real-world evidence from patients.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/47/e3sconf_icepe2021_03035.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zhu Xiaoying
spellingShingle Zhu Xiaoying
Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Zhu Xiaoying
author_sort Zhu Xiaoying
title Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy
title_short Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy
title_full Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy
title_fullStr Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Nusinersen and Evrysdi in the Treatment of Spinal Muscular Atrophy
title_sort comparison of nusinersen and evrysdi in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) is a genetic neuromuscular disease that commonly affects children, and usually worsens with age that often leads to permanent disability and death for many of the SMA patients. Recently, two drugs are developed to improving the quality of life of SMA sufferers: Evrysdi and Nusinersen. This study is identified by a systematic literature review to compare two treatments. The comparison attempts to focus on mechanism, administration and clinical trials. The trials include the ENDEAR study for Nusinersen, and the FIREFISH study for Evrysdi. Due to the different baselines of two trials, matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) is used to “weighted” baseline characteristics to match each other across all the studies. Each of the trials highlighted the effectiveness for comparison. Both Nusinersen and Evrysdi have had a major and positive impact on improving the quality of life of SMA, and both therapies have been shown to be highly effective. Moreover, the indirect comparison with Matching Adjustment Indirect Comparison shows that Risdiplam is more effective as compared to Nusinersen. Nonetheless, the comparison is still inaccurate due to lack of real-world evidence from patients.
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2021/47/e3sconf_icepe2021_03035.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuxiaoying comparisonofnusinersenandevrysdiinthetreatmentofspinalmuscularatrophy
_version_ 1721373203193921536