Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of Representation

Through myths that pattern and repeat we figure the world to ourselves. The desire to be done with myth, to surpass mythic thinking in favor of a “more” rational way of thinking, is but one way of perpetrating violence in the guise of similitude. The rejection of muthos by logos is itself a form of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sasha L. Biro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2019-07-01
Series:Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/disrupting-symmetry-jean-luc-nancy-and-luce-irigaray-on-myth-and-the-violence-of-representation/
id doaj-048b34296efb4159b5ef24832c185d06
record_format Article
spelling doaj-048b34296efb4159b5ef24832c185d062021-01-02T10:16:41ZengUniversity of WarsawEidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture2544-302X2544-302X2019-07-0132627410.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0018Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of RepresentationSasha L. Biro0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9868-4727Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Marist CollegeThrough myths that pattern and repeat we figure the world to ourselves. The desire to be done with myth, to surpass mythic thinking in favor of a “more” rational way of thinking, is but one way of perpetrating violence in the guise of similitude. The rejection of muthos by logos is itself a form of violence, with significant ramifications. The following analysis will explore the work of Luce Irigaray’s Speculum of the Other Woman, and Jean-Luc Nancy’s Inoperative Community, focusing on the ways in which myth becomes mythology, and the inescapable question of violence that attends this operation. This paper, although touching upon the matter, is not an attempt to answer the larger question of what myth is. The scope of this analysis is constrained to a discussion of both Nancy and Irigaray’s understanding of myth as foundational, as well as interrogating the nature of the violence of representation. I will briefly touch upon the long and elaborate conversation surrounding the muthos–logos divide.http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/disrupting-symmetry-jean-luc-nancy-and-luce-irigaray-on-myth-and-the-violence-of-representation/symmetryjean-luc nancyluce irigaraymythdisruptionviolence
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sasha L. Biro
spellingShingle Sasha L. Biro
Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of Representation
Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
symmetry
jean-luc nancy
luce irigaray
myth
disruption
violence
author_facet Sasha L. Biro
author_sort Sasha L. Biro
title Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of Representation
title_short Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of Representation
title_full Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of Representation
title_fullStr Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of Representation
title_full_unstemmed Disrupting Symmetry: Jean-Luc Nancy and Luce Irigaray on Myth and the Violence of Representation
title_sort disrupting symmetry: jean-luc nancy and luce irigaray on myth and the violence of representation
publisher University of Warsaw
series Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture
issn 2544-302X
2544-302X
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Through myths that pattern and repeat we figure the world to ourselves. The desire to be done with myth, to surpass mythic thinking in favor of a “more” rational way of thinking, is but one way of perpetrating violence in the guise of similitude. The rejection of muthos by logos is itself a form of violence, with significant ramifications. The following analysis will explore the work of Luce Irigaray’s Speculum of the Other Woman, and Jean-Luc Nancy’s Inoperative Community, focusing on the ways in which myth becomes mythology, and the inescapable question of violence that attends this operation. This paper, although touching upon the matter, is not an attempt to answer the larger question of what myth is. The scope of this analysis is constrained to a discussion of both Nancy and Irigaray’s understanding of myth as foundational, as well as interrogating the nature of the violence of representation. I will briefly touch upon the long and elaborate conversation surrounding the muthos–logos divide.
topic symmetry
jean-luc nancy
luce irigaray
myth
disruption
violence
url http://eidos.uw.edu.pl/disrupting-symmetry-jean-luc-nancy-and-luce-irigaray-on-myth-and-the-violence-of-representation/
work_keys_str_mv AT sashalbiro disruptingsymmetryjeanlucnancyandluceirigarayonmythandtheviolenceofrepresentation
_version_ 1724355487589203968