Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.

BACKGROUND:Risk communication (RC) is an essential tool for the prevention and control of diseases as it impacts risk perception, increases awareness and might change behaviour. It is the interactive exchange of information about risks among experts and people. Effective RC can minimize the impact t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vaitiare Mulderij-Jansen, Jelte Elsinga, Izzy Gerstenbluth, Ashley Duits, Adriana Tami, Ajay Bailey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-04-01
Series:PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008136
id doaj-0492666339a142f1a781ea691caafba5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0492666339a142f1a781ea691caafba52021-03-03T07:55:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases1935-27271935-27352020-04-01144e000813610.1371/journal.pntd.0008136Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.Vaitiare Mulderij-JansenJelte ElsingaIzzy GerstenbluthAshley DuitsAdriana TamiAjay BaileyBACKGROUND:Risk communication (RC) is an essential tool for the prevention and control of diseases as it impacts risk perception, increases awareness and might change behaviour. It is the interactive exchange of information about risks among experts and people. Effective RC can minimize the impact that diseases such as dengue, chikungunya and Zika have on populations. This study aimed to understand RC regarding vector-borne diseases in its social context and from the viewpoint of the audience to strengthen RC strategies in Curaçao. METHODS:In 2015, a cross-sectional mixed-method study applying focus group discussions (n = 7), in-depth interviews (n = 20) and a structured survey questionnaire (n = 339) was done in Curaçao. The study was designed based on the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. In addition, the Social Amplification of Risk Framework and the theory of cultural schemas were applied to understand RC in the social context. RESULTS:Television, radio and newspapers were the most important channels of information regarding dengue and chikungunya. Moreover, individuals also reported receiving information via social media, the internet and family/friends. Interestingly, the use of internet to obtain information diminished with age, while females were more likely to use internet compared to men. These key findings were statistically significant. An important outcome was that the risk perception towards chikungunya at the beginning of the outbreak was attenuated. This might be due to the (perceived) lack of RC before the epidemic. This same risk perception was amplified later during the outbreak by the increased exposure to information. Lastly, we show how cultural schemas influence people's perception regarding preventive measures and treatment of chikungunya and dengue. CONCLUSIONS:Data obtained emphasise the importance of understanding the user of media platforms and sharing information in a timely fashion through a transparent process with the content that convinces people of the seriousness of the matter.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008136
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vaitiare Mulderij-Jansen
Jelte Elsinga
Izzy Gerstenbluth
Ashley Duits
Adriana Tami
Ajay Bailey
spellingShingle Vaitiare Mulderij-Jansen
Jelte Elsinga
Izzy Gerstenbluth
Ashley Duits
Adriana Tami
Ajay Bailey
Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
author_facet Vaitiare Mulderij-Jansen
Jelte Elsinga
Izzy Gerstenbluth
Ashley Duits
Adriana Tami
Ajay Bailey
author_sort Vaitiare Mulderij-Jansen
title Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.
title_short Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.
title_full Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.
title_fullStr Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.
title_full_unstemmed Understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: A mixed-method study in Curaçao.
title_sort understanding risk communication for prevention and control of vector-borne diseases: a mixed-method study in curaçao.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
issn 1935-2727
1935-2735
publishDate 2020-04-01
description BACKGROUND:Risk communication (RC) is an essential tool for the prevention and control of diseases as it impacts risk perception, increases awareness and might change behaviour. It is the interactive exchange of information about risks among experts and people. Effective RC can minimize the impact that diseases such as dengue, chikungunya and Zika have on populations. This study aimed to understand RC regarding vector-borne diseases in its social context and from the viewpoint of the audience to strengthen RC strategies in Curaçao. METHODS:In 2015, a cross-sectional mixed-method study applying focus group discussions (n = 7), in-depth interviews (n = 20) and a structured survey questionnaire (n = 339) was done in Curaçao. The study was designed based on the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. In addition, the Social Amplification of Risk Framework and the theory of cultural schemas were applied to understand RC in the social context. RESULTS:Television, radio and newspapers were the most important channels of information regarding dengue and chikungunya. Moreover, individuals also reported receiving information via social media, the internet and family/friends. Interestingly, the use of internet to obtain information diminished with age, while females were more likely to use internet compared to men. These key findings were statistically significant. An important outcome was that the risk perception towards chikungunya at the beginning of the outbreak was attenuated. This might be due to the (perceived) lack of RC before the epidemic. This same risk perception was amplified later during the outbreak by the increased exposure to information. Lastly, we show how cultural schemas influence people's perception regarding preventive measures and treatment of chikungunya and dengue. CONCLUSIONS:Data obtained emphasise the importance of understanding the user of media platforms and sharing information in a timely fashion through a transparent process with the content that convinces people of the seriousness of the matter.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008136
work_keys_str_mv AT vaitiaremulderijjansen understandingriskcommunicationforpreventionandcontrolofvectorbornediseasesamixedmethodstudyincuracao
AT jelteelsinga understandingriskcommunicationforpreventionandcontrolofvectorbornediseasesamixedmethodstudyincuracao
AT izzygerstenbluth understandingriskcommunicationforpreventionandcontrolofvectorbornediseasesamixedmethodstudyincuracao
AT ashleyduits understandingriskcommunicationforpreventionandcontrolofvectorbornediseasesamixedmethodstudyincuracao
AT adrianatami understandingriskcommunicationforpreventionandcontrolofvectorbornediseasesamixedmethodstudyincuracao
AT ajaybailey understandingriskcommunicationforpreventionandcontrolofvectorbornediseasesamixedmethodstudyincuracao
_version_ 1714826960073392128