Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislation

In this paper we’d compare Ukrainian nationality laws of 1918, 1991 and 2001 and demonstrate trajectory of Ukrainian citizenship legislation. As we know modern correct application of citizenship issues is a very important tension in frames of such triangle: person – society – state. We should note t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vitalii Kovalchuk, Iryna Sofinska
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: PC Technology Center 2018-03-01
Series:ScienceRise: Juridical Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/126563
id doaj-04b2b6f46c094942b3a1c4cd2a3c8cfb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04b2b6f46c094942b3a1c4cd2a3c8cfb2020-11-24T21:56:54ZrusPC Technology CenterScienceRise: Juridical Science2523-41452523-41532018-03-0101 (3)41010.15587/2523-4153.2018.126563126563Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislationVitalii Kovalchuk0Iryna Sofinska1Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Psychology of the National University "Lviv Polytechnic" Kniazia Romana str., 1/3, Lviv, Ukraine, 79005Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Psychology of the National University "Lviv Polytechnic" Kniazia Romana str., 1/3, Lviv, Ukraine, 79005In this paper we’d compare Ukrainian nationality laws of 1918, 1991 and 2001 and demonstrate trajectory of Ukrainian citizenship legislation. As we know modern correct application of citizenship issues is a very important tension in frames of such triangle: person – society – state. We should note that till now there are a lot of discussions on this issue in order to determine possible strong ideological baggage, package of rights and duties and full membership in a state (features of citizenship) from everyday and personal complexity of social interaction. Obviously, citizenship is a personal question of constitutional matters, therefore we emphasize that it is not only a philosophic or sociological issue, but also a legal one, mainly because of its primary essence which is purely related to legal (constitutional) matters. Therefore, we are sure that a research of citizenship concept’ sources, deep analysis of its evolution and interconnection with state development deserves an additional attempt to study being one of the main modern European humanitarian standards and playing a prior role in personal self-consciousness and self-determination. That is why, the main citizenship markers we analyze in this paper are the followings: citizenship concept in the view of Nottebohm case 1955, principles of person’s acquisition of citizenship by birth (jus sanguinis and jus soli), dual (multiple) citizenship, modes of its acquisition (naturalization, by marriage, by option or transfer, by investment) and its losshttp://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/126563citizenshipcitizenship legislationacquisition of citizenshiploss of citizenshipdual (multiple) citizenship
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vitalii Kovalchuk
Iryna Sofinska
spellingShingle Vitalii Kovalchuk
Iryna Sofinska
Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislation
ScienceRise: Juridical Science
citizenship
citizenship legislation
acquisition of citizenship
loss of citizenship
dual (multiple) citizenship
author_facet Vitalii Kovalchuk
Iryna Sofinska
author_sort Vitalii Kovalchuk
title Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislation
title_short Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislation
title_full Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislation
title_fullStr Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislation
title_full_unstemmed Genesis of Ukrainian citizenship legislation
title_sort genesis of ukrainian citizenship legislation
publisher PC Technology Center
series ScienceRise: Juridical Science
issn 2523-4145
2523-4153
publishDate 2018-03-01
description In this paper we’d compare Ukrainian nationality laws of 1918, 1991 and 2001 and demonstrate trajectory of Ukrainian citizenship legislation. As we know modern correct application of citizenship issues is a very important tension in frames of such triangle: person – society – state. We should note that till now there are a lot of discussions on this issue in order to determine possible strong ideological baggage, package of rights and duties and full membership in a state (features of citizenship) from everyday and personal complexity of social interaction. Obviously, citizenship is a personal question of constitutional matters, therefore we emphasize that it is not only a philosophic or sociological issue, but also a legal one, mainly because of its primary essence which is purely related to legal (constitutional) matters. Therefore, we are sure that a research of citizenship concept’ sources, deep analysis of its evolution and interconnection with state development deserves an additional attempt to study being one of the main modern European humanitarian standards and playing a prior role in personal self-consciousness and self-determination. That is why, the main citizenship markers we analyze in this paper are the followings: citizenship concept in the view of Nottebohm case 1955, principles of person’s acquisition of citizenship by birth (jus sanguinis and jus soli), dual (multiple) citizenship, modes of its acquisition (naturalization, by marriage, by option or transfer, by investment) and its loss
topic citizenship
citizenship legislation
acquisition of citizenship
loss of citizenship
dual (multiple) citizenship
url http://journals.uran.ua/sr_law/article/view/126563
work_keys_str_mv AT vitaliikovalchuk genesisofukrainiancitizenshiplegislation
AT irynasofinska genesisofukrainiancitizenshiplegislation
_version_ 1725856458572038144