Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry

AIM: To investigate the difference of central corneal thickness(CCT)measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscahⅡ system and ultrasonic pachmetry, and to evaluate the correlation and consistency of the results for providing a theoretical basis for clinical application.<p>METHODS: The mean value of CCT i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hong-Tao Zhang, Hua Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2013-09-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/9/201309018.pdf
id doaj-04d540b1f9f844e78460f6a24b22ebf5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04d540b1f9f844e78460f6a24b22ebf52020-11-24T22:15:05ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51232013-09-011391801180410.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2013.09.18Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetryHong-Tao ZhangHua JiangAIM: To investigate the difference of central corneal thickness(CCT)measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscahⅡ system and ultrasonic pachmetry, and to evaluate the correlation and consistency of the results for providing a theoretical basis for clinical application.<p>METHODS: The mean value of CCT in 70 eyes of 35 patients measured three times by Lenstar LS900, OrbscahⅡ system and ultrasonic pachmetry underwent statistical analysis. The difference of CCT was compared, and the correlation and consistency of three measurements were analyzed to provide theoretical basis for clinical application. CCT values measured by different methods were analyzed with randomized block variance analysis. LSD-<i>t</i> test was used for pairwise comparison between groups. The correlation of three measurement methods were analyzed by linear correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman was used to analyze the consistency.<p>RESULTS: The mean CCT values measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry were 542.75±40.06, 528.74±39.59, 538.54±40.93μm, respectively. The mean difference of CCT measurement was 4.21±8.78μm between Lenstar LS900 and ultrasonic pachmetry, 14.01±13.39μm between Lenstar LS900 and Orbscan Ⅱ, 9.8±10.57μm between ultrasonic pachmetry and Orbscan Ⅱ. The difference was statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). Three measurements were highly correlated(<i>P</i>>0.05): There was positive correlation between CCT with Lenstar LS900 and ultrasonic pachmetry(<i>r</i>=0.977, 0.944; <i>P</i><0.05). The analysis method of Bland-Altman: 95% consistent interval of upper and lower value was -13.0~21.4μm between Lenstar LS900 and ultrasonic pachmetry, 1.4% points outside the limits of agreement of 95%, 95% consistent interval of upper and lower value was -30.5~10.9μm between OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry, 7.1% points outside the limits of agreement of 95% consistent interval. <p>CONCLUSION: There are excellent correlation among Lenstar LS900, Orbscan Ⅱ and ultrasonic pachmetry. Lenstar LS900 can be used as CCT non-contact measurement tool.http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/9/201309018.pdfcentral corneal thicknessLenstar LS900Orbscan Ⅱultrasonic pachmetrymyopia
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hong-Tao Zhang
Hua Jiang
spellingShingle Hong-Tao Zhang
Hua Jiang
Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
central corneal thickness
Lenstar LS900
Orbscan Ⅱ
ultrasonic pachmetry
myopia
author_facet Hong-Tao Zhang
Hua Jiang
author_sort Hong-Tao Zhang
title Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry
title_short Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry
title_full Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry
title_fullStr Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry
title_sort comparison of central corneal thickness measured by lenstar ls900, orbscanⅱ and ultrasonic pachmetry
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
issn 1672-5123
publishDate 2013-09-01
description AIM: To investigate the difference of central corneal thickness(CCT)measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscahⅡ system and ultrasonic pachmetry, and to evaluate the correlation and consistency of the results for providing a theoretical basis for clinical application.<p>METHODS: The mean value of CCT in 70 eyes of 35 patients measured three times by Lenstar LS900, OrbscahⅡ system and ultrasonic pachmetry underwent statistical analysis. The difference of CCT was compared, and the correlation and consistency of three measurements were analyzed to provide theoretical basis for clinical application. CCT values measured by different methods were analyzed with randomized block variance analysis. LSD-<i>t</i> test was used for pairwise comparison between groups. The correlation of three measurement methods were analyzed by linear correlation analysis, and Bland-Altman was used to analyze the consistency.<p>RESULTS: The mean CCT values measured by Lenstar LS900, OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry were 542.75±40.06, 528.74±39.59, 538.54±40.93μm, respectively. The mean difference of CCT measurement was 4.21±8.78μm between Lenstar LS900 and ultrasonic pachmetry, 14.01±13.39μm between Lenstar LS900 and Orbscan Ⅱ, 9.8±10.57μm between ultrasonic pachmetry and Orbscan Ⅱ. The difference was statistically significant(<i>P</i><0.05). Three measurements were highly correlated(<i>P</i>>0.05): There was positive correlation between CCT with Lenstar LS900 and ultrasonic pachmetry(<i>r</i>=0.977, 0.944; <i>P</i><0.05). The analysis method of Bland-Altman: 95% consistent interval of upper and lower value was -13.0~21.4μm between Lenstar LS900 and ultrasonic pachmetry, 1.4% points outside the limits of agreement of 95%, 95% consistent interval of upper and lower value was -30.5~10.9μm between OrbscanⅡ and ultrasonic pachmetry, 7.1% points outside the limits of agreement of 95% consistent interval. <p>CONCLUSION: There are excellent correlation among Lenstar LS900, Orbscan Ⅱ and ultrasonic pachmetry. Lenstar LS900 can be used as CCT non-contact measurement tool.
topic central corneal thickness
Lenstar LS900
Orbscan Ⅱ
ultrasonic pachmetry
myopia
url http://www.ies.net.cn/cn_publish/2013/9/201309018.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hongtaozhang comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasuredbylenstarls900orbscaniiandultrasonicpachmetry
AT huajiang comparisonofcentralcornealthicknessmeasuredbylenstarls900orbscaniiandultrasonicpachmetry
_version_ 1725796104576958464