Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland

Greenland Ice Sheet surface temperatures are controlled by an exchange of energy at the surface, which includes radiative, turbulent, and ground heat fluxes. Data collected by multiple projects are leveraged to calculate all surface energy budget (SEB) terms at Summit, Greenland, for the full annual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. B. Miller, M. D. Shupe, C. J. Cox, D. Noone, P. O. G. Persson, K. Steffen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-02-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:http://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/497/2017/tc-11-497-2017.pdf
id doaj-04e9073c09e1434ba617f0aa8ec8b006
record_format Article
spelling doaj-04e9073c09e1434ba617f0aa8ec8b0062020-11-24T23:19:37ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242017-02-0111149751610.5194/tc-11-497-2017Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, GreenlandN. B. Miller0M. D. Shupe1C. J. Cox2D. Noone3P. O. G. Persson4K. Steffen5Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USACollege of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USACooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USASwiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandGreenland Ice Sheet surface temperatures are controlled by an exchange of energy at the surface, which includes radiative, turbulent, and ground heat fluxes. Data collected by multiple projects are leveraged to calculate all surface energy budget (SEB) terms at Summit, Greenland, for the full annual cycle from July 2013 to June 2014 and extend to longer periods for the radiative and turbulent SEB terms. Radiative fluxes are measured directly by a suite of broadband radiometers. Turbulent sensible heat flux is estimated via the bulk aerodynamic and eddy correlation methods, and the turbulent latent heat flux is calculated via a two-level approach using measurements at 10 and 2 m. The subsurface heat flux is calculated using a string of thermistors buried in the snow pack. Extensive quality-control data processing produced a data set in which all terms of the SEB are present 75 % of the full annual cycle, despite the harsh conditions. By including a storage term for a near-surface layer, the SEB is balanced in this data set to within the aggregated uncertainties for the individual terms. November and August case studies illustrate that surface radiative forcing is driven by synoptically forced cloud characteristics, especially by low-level, liquid-bearing clouds. The annual cycle and seasonal diurnal cycles of all SEB components indicate that the non-radiative terms are anticorrelated to changes in the total radiative flux and are hence responding to cloud radiative forcing. Generally, the non-radiative SEB terms and the upwelling longwave radiation component compensate for changes in downwelling radiation, although exact partitioning of energy in the response terms varies with season and near-surface characteristics such as stability and moisture availability. Substantial surface warming from low-level clouds typically leads to a change from a very stable to a weakly stable near-surface regime with no solar radiation or from a weakly stable to neutral/unstable regime with solar radiation. Relationships between forcing terms and responding surface fluxes show that the upwelling longwave radiation produces 65–85 % (50–60 %) of the total response in the winter (summer) and the non-radiative terms compensate for the remaining change in the combined downwelling longwave and net shortwave radiation. Because melt conditions are rarely reached at Summit, these relationships are documented for conditions of surface temperature below 0 °C, with and without solar radiation. This is the first time that forcing and response term relationships have been investigated in detail for the Greenland SEB. These results should both advance understanding of process relationships over the Greenland Ice Sheet and be useful for model validation.http://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/497/2017/tc-11-497-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. B. Miller
M. D. Shupe
C. J. Cox
D. Noone
P. O. G. Persson
K. Steffen
spellingShingle N. B. Miller
M. D. Shupe
C. J. Cox
D. Noone
P. O. G. Persson
K. Steffen
Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland
The Cryosphere
author_facet N. B. Miller
M. D. Shupe
C. J. Cox
D. Noone
P. O. G. Persson
K. Steffen
author_sort N. B. Miller
title Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland
title_short Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland
title_full Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland
title_fullStr Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland
title_full_unstemmed Surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at Summit, Greenland
title_sort surface energy budget responses to radiative forcing at summit, greenland
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The Cryosphere
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
publishDate 2017-02-01
description Greenland Ice Sheet surface temperatures are controlled by an exchange of energy at the surface, which includes radiative, turbulent, and ground heat fluxes. Data collected by multiple projects are leveraged to calculate all surface energy budget (SEB) terms at Summit, Greenland, for the full annual cycle from July 2013 to June 2014 and extend to longer periods for the radiative and turbulent SEB terms. Radiative fluxes are measured directly by a suite of broadband radiometers. Turbulent sensible heat flux is estimated via the bulk aerodynamic and eddy correlation methods, and the turbulent latent heat flux is calculated via a two-level approach using measurements at 10 and 2 m. The subsurface heat flux is calculated using a string of thermistors buried in the snow pack. Extensive quality-control data processing produced a data set in which all terms of the SEB are present 75 % of the full annual cycle, despite the harsh conditions. By including a storage term for a near-surface layer, the SEB is balanced in this data set to within the aggregated uncertainties for the individual terms. November and August case studies illustrate that surface radiative forcing is driven by synoptically forced cloud characteristics, especially by low-level, liquid-bearing clouds. The annual cycle and seasonal diurnal cycles of all SEB components indicate that the non-radiative terms are anticorrelated to changes in the total radiative flux and are hence responding to cloud radiative forcing. Generally, the non-radiative SEB terms and the upwelling longwave radiation component compensate for changes in downwelling radiation, although exact partitioning of energy in the response terms varies with season and near-surface characteristics such as stability and moisture availability. Substantial surface warming from low-level clouds typically leads to a change from a very stable to a weakly stable near-surface regime with no solar radiation or from a weakly stable to neutral/unstable regime with solar radiation. Relationships between forcing terms and responding surface fluxes show that the upwelling longwave radiation produces 65–85 % (50–60 %) of the total response in the winter (summer) and the non-radiative terms compensate for the remaining change in the combined downwelling longwave and net shortwave radiation. Because melt conditions are rarely reached at Summit, these relationships are documented for conditions of surface temperature below 0 °C, with and without solar radiation. This is the first time that forcing and response term relationships have been investigated in detail for the Greenland SEB. These results should both advance understanding of process relationships over the Greenland Ice Sheet and be useful for model validation.
url http://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/497/2017/tc-11-497-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nbmiller surfaceenergybudgetresponsestoradiativeforcingatsummitgreenland
AT mdshupe surfaceenergybudgetresponsestoradiativeforcingatsummitgreenland
AT cjcox surfaceenergybudgetresponsestoradiativeforcingatsummitgreenland
AT dnoone surfaceenergybudgetresponsestoradiativeforcingatsummitgreenland
AT pogpersson surfaceenergybudgetresponsestoradiativeforcingatsummitgreenland
AT ksteffen surfaceenergybudgetresponsestoradiativeforcingatsummitgreenland
_version_ 1725577929865297920