Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.

The difficulty of censusing marine animal populations hampers effective ocean management. Analyzing water for DNA traces shed by organisms may aid assessment. Here we tested aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) as an indicator of fish presence in the lower Hudson River estuary. A checklist of local mari...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Y Stoeckle, Lyubov Soboleva, Zachary Charlop-Powers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5389620?pdf=render
id doaj-05245af765cf40a4b3b643082496e118
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05245af765cf40a4b3b643082496e1182020-11-24T21:09:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01124e017518610.1371/journal.pone.0175186Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.Mark Y StoeckleLyubov SobolevaZachary Charlop-PowersThe difficulty of censusing marine animal populations hampers effective ocean management. Analyzing water for DNA traces shed by organisms may aid assessment. Here we tested aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) as an indicator of fish presence in the lower Hudson River estuary. A checklist of local marine fish and their relative abundance was prepared by compiling 12 traditional surveys conducted between 1988-2015. To improve eDNA identification success, 31 specimens representing 18 marine fish species were sequenced for two mitochondrial gene regions, boosting coverage of the 12S eDNA target sequence to 80% of local taxa. We collected 76 one-liter shoreline surface water samples at two contrasting estuary locations over six months beginning in January 2016. eDNA was amplified with vertebrate-specific 12S primers. Bioinformatic analysis of amplified DNA, using a reference library of GenBank and our newly generated 12S sequences, detected most (81%) locally abundant or common species and relatively few (23%) uncommon taxa, and corresponded to seasonal presence and habitat preference as determined by traditional surveys. Approximately 2% of fish reads were commonly consumed species that are rare or absent in local waters, consistent with wastewater input. Freshwater species were rarely detected despite Hudson River inflow. These results support further exploration and suggest eDNA will facilitate fine-scale geographic and temporal mapping of marine fish populations at relatively low cost.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5389620?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Y Stoeckle
Lyubov Soboleva
Zachary Charlop-Powers
spellingShingle Mark Y Stoeckle
Lyubov Soboleva
Zachary Charlop-Powers
Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mark Y Stoeckle
Lyubov Soboleva
Zachary Charlop-Powers
author_sort Mark Y Stoeckle
title Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.
title_short Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.
title_full Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.
title_fullStr Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.
title_full_unstemmed Aquatic environmental DNA detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.
title_sort aquatic environmental dna detects seasonal fish abundance and habitat preference in an urban estuary.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The difficulty of censusing marine animal populations hampers effective ocean management. Analyzing water for DNA traces shed by organisms may aid assessment. Here we tested aquatic environmental DNA (eDNA) as an indicator of fish presence in the lower Hudson River estuary. A checklist of local marine fish and their relative abundance was prepared by compiling 12 traditional surveys conducted between 1988-2015. To improve eDNA identification success, 31 specimens representing 18 marine fish species were sequenced for two mitochondrial gene regions, boosting coverage of the 12S eDNA target sequence to 80% of local taxa. We collected 76 one-liter shoreline surface water samples at two contrasting estuary locations over six months beginning in January 2016. eDNA was amplified with vertebrate-specific 12S primers. Bioinformatic analysis of amplified DNA, using a reference library of GenBank and our newly generated 12S sequences, detected most (81%) locally abundant or common species and relatively few (23%) uncommon taxa, and corresponded to seasonal presence and habitat preference as determined by traditional surveys. Approximately 2% of fish reads were commonly consumed species that are rare or absent in local waters, consistent with wastewater input. Freshwater species were rarely detected despite Hudson River inflow. These results support further exploration and suggest eDNA will facilitate fine-scale geographic and temporal mapping of marine fish populations at relatively low cost.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5389620?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT markystoeckle aquaticenvironmentaldnadetectsseasonalfishabundanceandhabitatpreferenceinanurbanestuary
AT lyubovsoboleva aquaticenvironmentaldnadetectsseasonalfishabundanceandhabitatpreferenceinanurbanestuary
AT zacharycharloppowers aquaticenvironmentaldnadetectsseasonalfishabundanceandhabitatpreferenceinanurbanestuary
_version_ 1716757141475295232