Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial)
Abstract Background Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. However, persistent pain after cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis is reported in up to 40% of patients. The aim of the SECURE trial is to compare the effectiveness of usual care with...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-11-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2989-5 |
id |
doaj-05392516ba674b2b9f4e681dfbb7c3e1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-05392516ba674b2b9f4e681dfbb7c3e12020-11-25T01:53:19ZengBMCTrials1745-62152018-11-0119111010.1186/s13063-018-2989-5Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial)Sarah Z. Wennmacker0Aafke H. van Dijk1Joost P. H. Drenth2Sandra C. Donkervoort3Djamila Boerma4Gert P. Westert5Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven6Marja A. Boermeester7Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf8Philip R. de Reuver9Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical CentreDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical CentreGastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical CentreDepartment of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe GasthuisDepartment of Surgery, St. Antonius HospitalDepartment of IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical CentreDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical CentreDepartment of Surgery, Academic Medical CentreClinical Research Unit, Academic Medical CentreDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical CentreAbstract Background Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. However, persistent pain after cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis is reported in up to 40% of patients. The aim of the SECURE trial is to compare the effectiveness of usual care with a restrictive strategy using a standardized work-up with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal complaints. The SECURE trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial in patients with abdominal symptoms and ultrasound-proven gallstones or sludge. Randomization was performed to either usual care (standard practice, according to the physician’s knowledge and experience, and physician’s and patient’s preference) or a restrictive standardized strategy: treated with interval evaluation and stepwise selection for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on fulfilment of pre-specified criteria. This article presents in detail the statistical analysis plan (SAP) of this trial and was submitted before outcomes were available to the investigators. Results The primary end point of this trial is defined as the proportion of patients being pain-free at 12 months’ follow-up. Pain will be assessed with the Izbicki Pain Score. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with complications due to gallstones or cholecystectomy, quality of life, the association between the patients’ symptoms and treatment, work performance, and cost-effectiveness. Discussion The data from the SECURE trial will provide evidence whether or not a restrictive strategy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis is associated with similar patient reported outcomes and a reduction in the number of cholecystectomies compared to usual care. The data from this trial will be analyzed according to this pre-specified SAP. Trial registration The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022. Registered on 5 June 2013.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2989-5CholecystectomySymptomatic gallstonesAbdominal painCost-effectiveness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sarah Z. Wennmacker Aafke H. van Dijk Joost P. H. Drenth Sandra C. Donkervoort Djamila Boerma Gert P. Westert Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven Marja A. Boermeester Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf Philip R. de Reuver |
spellingShingle |
Sarah Z. Wennmacker Aafke H. van Dijk Joost P. H. Drenth Sandra C. Donkervoort Djamila Boerma Gert P. Westert Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven Marja A. Boermeester Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf Philip R. de Reuver Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial) Trials Cholecystectomy Symptomatic gallstones Abdominal pain Cost-effectiveness |
author_facet |
Sarah Z. Wennmacker Aafke H. van Dijk Joost P. H. Drenth Sandra C. Donkervoort Djamila Boerma Gert P. Westert Cornelis J. H. M. van Laarhoven Marja A. Boermeester Marcel G. W. Dijkgraaf Philip R. de Reuver |
author_sort |
Sarah Z. Wennmacker |
title |
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial) |
title_short |
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial) |
title_full |
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial) |
title_fullStr |
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (SECURE trial) |
title_sort |
statistical analysis plan of a randomized controlled trial to compare a restrictive strategy to usual care for the effectiveness of cholecystectomy (secure trial) |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Trials |
issn |
1745-6215 |
publishDate |
2018-11-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. However, persistent pain after cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis is reported in up to 40% of patients. The aim of the SECURE trial is to compare the effectiveness of usual care with a restrictive strategy using a standardized work-up with stepwise selection for cholecystectomy in patients with gallstones and abdominal complaints. The SECURE trial is designed as a multicenter, randomized, parallel-arm, non-inferiority trial in patients with abdominal symptoms and ultrasound-proven gallstones or sludge. Randomization was performed to either usual care (standard practice, according to the physician’s knowledge and experience, and physician’s and patient’s preference) or a restrictive standardized strategy: treated with interval evaluation and stepwise selection for laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on fulfilment of pre-specified criteria. This article presents in detail the statistical analysis plan (SAP) of this trial and was submitted before outcomes were available to the investigators. Results The primary end point of this trial is defined as the proportion of patients being pain-free at 12 months’ follow-up. Pain will be assessed with the Izbicki Pain Score. Secondary endpoints will be the proportion of patients with complications due to gallstones or cholecystectomy, quality of life, the association between the patients’ symptoms and treatment, work performance, and cost-effectiveness. Discussion The data from the SECURE trial will provide evidence whether or not a restrictive strategy in patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis is associated with similar patient reported outcomes and a reduction in the number of cholecystectomies compared to usual care. The data from this trial will be analyzed according to this pre-specified SAP. Trial registration The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022. Registered on 5 June 2013. |
topic |
Cholecystectomy Symptomatic gallstones Abdominal pain Cost-effectiveness |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2989-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sarahzwennmacker statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT aafkehvandijk statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT joostphdrenth statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT sandracdonkervoort statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT djamilaboerma statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT gertpwestert statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT cornelisjhmvanlaarhoven statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT marjaaboermeester statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT marcelgwdijkgraaf statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial AT philiprdereuver statisticalanalysisplanofarandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparearestrictivestrategytousualcarefortheeffectivenessofcholecystectomysecuretrial |
_version_ |
1724991724712886272 |