K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances

Background and objective Subjective grade-based scoring balance assessments tend to be lengthy and have demonstrated poor repeatability and reliability. This study examined the reliability of a mobile balance assessment tool and differences in balance measurements between individuals at risk for a b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chelsea Zhang, Alexandra Talaber, Melanie Truong, Bert B Vargas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-10-01
Series:Digital Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619885573
id doaj-055b3b43afde4cdf975c3b076eb06e94
record_format Article
spelling doaj-055b3b43afde4cdf975c3b076eb06e942020-11-25T03:04:41ZengSAGE PublishingDigital Health2055-20762019-10-01510.1177/2055207619885573K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stancesChelsea ZhangAlexandra TalaberMelanie TruongBert B VargasBackground and objective Subjective grade-based scoring balance assessments tend to be lengthy and have demonstrated poor repeatability and reliability. This study examined the reliability of a mobile balance assessment tool and differences in balance measurements between individuals at risk for a balance deficit secondary to a diagnosed neurological or musculoskeletal condition and a control group of healthy individuals. Methods Objective balance testing was measured using K-D Balance on a compatible iPhone. Seventy-seven participants were enrolled (control group, n  =   44; group at risk for balance deficits, n  =   33). Mean and standard deviation of K-D Balance were recorded for each stance. Intra-rater reliability was calculated by repeating the trial. Results Overall balance scores were superior for the control group compared with the group at risk for balance deficits in double leg stance (mean (SD): 0.15 (0.12) versus 0.18 (0.13), p  =   0.260), tandem stance right leg (mean (SD): 0.27 (0.17) versus 0.45 (0.49), p  =   0.028), and tandem stance left leg (mean (SD): 0.26 (0.17) versus 0.35 (0.35), p  =   0.136). Intra-rater reliability was good to excellent for K-D Balance double leg stance (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58–1.03), tandem stance right leg (ICC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.86–1.06) and tandem stance left leg (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–1.0). Conclusions K-D Balance revealed differences in balance performance between healthy individuals compared with individuals with neurological or musculoskeletal impairment. Objective balance measures may improve the accuracy and reliability of clinical balance assessment by detecting subtle differences in balance and aid in early detection of diseases that impair balance.https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619885573
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chelsea Zhang
Alexandra Talaber
Melanie Truong
Bert B Vargas
spellingShingle Chelsea Zhang
Alexandra Talaber
Melanie Truong
Bert B Vargas
K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances
Digital Health
author_facet Chelsea Zhang
Alexandra Talaber
Melanie Truong
Bert B Vargas
author_sort Chelsea Zhang
title K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances
title_short K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances
title_full K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances
title_fullStr K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances
title_full_unstemmed K-D Balance: An objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances
title_sort k-d balance: an objective measure of balance in tandem and double leg stances
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Digital Health
issn 2055-2076
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Background and objective Subjective grade-based scoring balance assessments tend to be lengthy and have demonstrated poor repeatability and reliability. This study examined the reliability of a mobile balance assessment tool and differences in balance measurements between individuals at risk for a balance deficit secondary to a diagnosed neurological or musculoskeletal condition and a control group of healthy individuals. Methods Objective balance testing was measured using K-D Balance on a compatible iPhone. Seventy-seven participants were enrolled (control group, n  =   44; group at risk for balance deficits, n  =   33). Mean and standard deviation of K-D Balance were recorded for each stance. Intra-rater reliability was calculated by repeating the trial. Results Overall balance scores were superior for the control group compared with the group at risk for balance deficits in double leg stance (mean (SD): 0.15 (0.12) versus 0.18 (0.13), p  =   0.260), tandem stance right leg (mean (SD): 0.27 (0.17) versus 0.45 (0.49), p  =   0.028), and tandem stance left leg (mean (SD): 0.26 (0.17) versus 0.35 (0.35), p  =   0.136). Intra-rater reliability was good to excellent for K-D Balance double leg stance (intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58–1.03), tandem stance right leg (ICC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.86–1.06) and tandem stance left leg (ICC = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95–1.0). Conclusions K-D Balance revealed differences in balance performance between healthy individuals compared with individuals with neurological or musculoskeletal impairment. Objective balance measures may improve the accuracy and reliability of clinical balance assessment by detecting subtle differences in balance and aid in early detection of diseases that impair balance.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619885573
work_keys_str_mv AT chelseazhang kdbalanceanobjectivemeasureofbalanceintandemanddoublelegstances
AT alexandratalaber kdbalanceanobjectivemeasureofbalanceintandemanddoublelegstances
AT melanietruong kdbalanceanobjectivemeasureofbalanceintandemanddoublelegstances
AT bertbvargas kdbalanceanobjectivemeasureofbalanceintandemanddoublelegstances
_version_ 1724680375851024384