Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)

Background and Objective. Most patients with giant pulmonary bulla (GPB) are treated by surgery; however, there is a subset for whom surgery is not a viable option, such as those with contraindications, or those unwilling to undergo operation. Therefore, an alternative minimally invasive method is d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei-Liang Li, Yong-Hua Li, Yu-Bo Yang, Li-Hui Lv
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2018-01-01
Series:Canadian Respiratory Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5806834
id doaj-0576507c14c54128940b80db3445670c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0576507c14c54128940b80db3445670c2021-07-02T08:27:35ZengHindawi LimitedCanadian Respiratory Journal1198-22411916-72452018-01-01201810.1155/2018/58068345806834Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)Wei-Liang Li0Yong-Hua Li1Yu-Bo Yang2Li-Hui Lv3Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Mingzhou Hospital, Zhejiang University, No. 168 West Taian Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315199, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Donghai Hospital, Ningbo University, No. 377 Zhongshan East Road, Ningbo 315040, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Mingzhou Hospital, Zhejiang University, No. 168 West Taian Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315199, ChinaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Donghai Hospital, Ningbo University, No. 377 Zhongshan East Road, Ningbo 315040, ChinaBackground and Objective. Most patients with giant pulmonary bulla (GPB) are treated by surgery; however, there is a subset for whom surgery is not a viable option, such as those with contraindications, or those unwilling to undergo operation. Therefore, an alternative minimally invasive method is desired for this subpopulation. The aim of this study was to explore an alternative procedure for treating GPB. Methods. This was a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm, unblinded study evaluating the efficacy and safety of intrabulla adhesion pexia (IBAP) procedure in GPB patients. The study was conducted between December 2004 and April 2017. Results. There were 38 cases in 36 patients (33 males and 3 females) with the target GPB cavities varying in size (range, 10 cm × 7 cm × 5 cm to 15 cm × 8 cm × 30 cm (anteroposterior diameter × medial-lateral diameter × superoinferior diameter)). After IBAP treatment, the closure ratio of GPB in one month was 86.84% (33/38), while the dyspnea index significantly decreased from 4.11 ± 1.11 to 2.24 ± 1.15 (P<0.01). In addition, the mean FEV1 (L) increased from 1.06 ± 0.73 to 1.57 ± 1.13 (P<0.01), while RV (L) decreased from 2.77 ± 0.54 to 2.36 ± 0.38 (P<0.01) and TLC (L) decreased from 6.46 ± 1.21 to 5.86 ± 1.08 (P<0.01). Moreover, PaO2 (mmHg) increased from 52.18 ± 8.31 to 68.29 ± 12.34, while the 6 MWD increased by 129.36% from 131.58 ± 105.24 to 301.79 ± 197.90 (P<0.01). Collectively, these data indicated significant improvement in pulmonary function and exercise tolerance after IBAP treatment. Furthermore, no deaths occurred during IBAP treatment, and no cases of aggravated GPB relapse were reported during the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusions. IBAP is a promising strategy for the treatment of GPB. Our findings demonstrated that IBAP had a noteworthy therapeutic effect, desirable safety, and ideal long-term efficacy for GPB.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5806834
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wei-Liang Li
Yong-Hua Li
Yu-Bo Yang
Li-Hui Lv
spellingShingle Wei-Liang Li
Yong-Hua Li
Yu-Bo Yang
Li-Hui Lv
Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)
Canadian Respiratory Journal
author_facet Wei-Liang Li
Yong-Hua Li
Yu-Bo Yang
Li-Hui Lv
author_sort Wei-Liang Li
title Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)
title_short Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)
title_full Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)
title_fullStr Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)
title_full_unstemmed Intrabullous Adhesion Pexia (IBAP) by Percutaneous Pulmonary Bulla Centesis: An Alternative for the Surgical Treatment of Giant Pulmonary Bulla (GPB)
title_sort intrabullous adhesion pexia (ibap) by percutaneous pulmonary bulla centesis: an alternative for the surgical treatment of giant pulmonary bulla (gpb)
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Canadian Respiratory Journal
issn 1198-2241
1916-7245
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Background and Objective. Most patients with giant pulmonary bulla (GPB) are treated by surgery; however, there is a subset for whom surgery is not a viable option, such as those with contraindications, or those unwilling to undergo operation. Therefore, an alternative minimally invasive method is desired for this subpopulation. The aim of this study was to explore an alternative procedure for treating GPB. Methods. This was a prospective, nonrandomized, single-arm, unblinded study evaluating the efficacy and safety of intrabulla adhesion pexia (IBAP) procedure in GPB patients. The study was conducted between December 2004 and April 2017. Results. There were 38 cases in 36 patients (33 males and 3 females) with the target GPB cavities varying in size (range, 10 cm × 7 cm × 5 cm to 15 cm × 8 cm × 30 cm (anteroposterior diameter × medial-lateral diameter × superoinferior diameter)). After IBAP treatment, the closure ratio of GPB in one month was 86.84% (33/38), while the dyspnea index significantly decreased from 4.11 ± 1.11 to 2.24 ± 1.15 (P<0.01). In addition, the mean FEV1 (L) increased from 1.06 ± 0.73 to 1.57 ± 1.13 (P<0.01), while RV (L) decreased from 2.77 ± 0.54 to 2.36 ± 0.38 (P<0.01) and TLC (L) decreased from 6.46 ± 1.21 to 5.86 ± 1.08 (P<0.01). Moreover, PaO2 (mmHg) increased from 52.18 ± 8.31 to 68.29 ± 12.34, while the 6 MWD increased by 129.36% from 131.58 ± 105.24 to 301.79 ± 197.90 (P<0.01). Collectively, these data indicated significant improvement in pulmonary function and exercise tolerance after IBAP treatment. Furthermore, no deaths occurred during IBAP treatment, and no cases of aggravated GPB relapse were reported during the 12-month follow-up period. Conclusions. IBAP is a promising strategy for the treatment of GPB. Our findings demonstrated that IBAP had a noteworthy therapeutic effect, desirable safety, and ideal long-term efficacy for GPB.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/5806834
work_keys_str_mv AT weiliangli intrabullousadhesionpexiaibapbypercutaneouspulmonarybullacentesisanalternativeforthesurgicaltreatmentofgiantpulmonarybullagpb
AT yonghuali intrabullousadhesionpexiaibapbypercutaneouspulmonarybullacentesisanalternativeforthesurgicaltreatmentofgiantpulmonarybullagpb
AT yuboyang intrabullousadhesionpexiaibapbypercutaneouspulmonarybullacentesisanalternativeforthesurgicaltreatmentofgiantpulmonarybullagpb
AT lihuilv intrabullousadhesionpexiaibapbypercutaneouspulmonarybullacentesisanalternativeforthesurgicaltreatmentofgiantpulmonarybullagpb
_version_ 1721334699787288576