Comparison of the Clinical Recovery after Nerve Defect Reconstruction Using 4 Different Methods – Experimental Model
There are several possibilities for repairing a nerve defect. These include nerve grafting, tissues for bridging, biological or synthetic nerve conduits. Such conduits, alone or filled with different tissues or substances, may be the key for a major breakthrough in the modern treatment of nerve defe...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Media Med Publicis
2021-06-01
|
| Series: | Modern Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://medicinamoderna.ro/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Comparison-of-the-Clinical-Recovery-after-Nerve-Defect-Reconstruction-Using-4-Different-Methods-%E2%80%93-Experimental-Model-1.pdf |
| Summary: | There are several possibilities for repairing a nerve defect. These include nerve grafting, tissues for bridging, biological or synthetic nerve conduits. Such conduits, alone or filled with different tissues or substances, may be the key for a major breakthrough in the modern treatment of nerve defects. The easiest way to research these new methods is by experimental in vivo research on live animals – such as the Wistar rats. The following article aims to compare 4 different types of repairs for nerve defects: the nerve graft, a biologic nerve conduit (rat aorta), rat aorta with platelet rich plasma and rat aorta with stem cells. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1223-0472 2360-2473 |