Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi Objek

As beginners, many first-year students have difficulty understanding object-oriented programming material. To help students learn algorithmic and object-oriented programming material researchers have developed visual programming (PV). Visual programming is a tool to facilitate learning programming....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kursehi Falgenti
Format: Article
Language:Indonesian
Published: Indonesian Society of Applied Science (ISAS) 2020-07-01
Series:Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.isas.or.id/index.php/JACOST/article/view/53
id doaj-05a1f9f6740f49389b003afc06a80700
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05a1f9f6740f49389b003afc06a807002021-07-22T05:58:18ZindIndonesian Society of Applied Science (ISAS)Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology2723-14532020-07-0111384310.52158/jacost.v1i1.5353Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi ObjekKursehi Falgenti0STMIK Nusamandiri JakartaAs beginners, many first-year students have difficulty understanding object-oriented programming material. To help students learn algorithmic and object-oriented programming material researchers have developed visual programming (PV). Visual programming is a tool to facilitate learning programming. The concept of learning to use PV visualizes the work processes of algorithms and programming. This research aims to compare three dynamic PV tools for object-oriented learning programming that are the most studied. To determine the PV to be compared, a survey was conducted in an online journal database, such as IEEE explore, ACM, and several well-known online publishers. From the survey results, three dynamic PVs were chosen, most widely discussed, namely Jeliot 3, Ville and Jive. All three tools are installed and studied. Comparison results show that each dynamic PV has advantages on certain characteristics. The instructor can choose visual programming by considering the advantages of each PV.https://journal.isas.or.id/index.php/JACOST/article/view/53algorithms and programmingobject-oriented programmingvisual programming
collection DOAJ
language Indonesian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kursehi Falgenti
spellingShingle Kursehi Falgenti
Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi Objek
Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology
algorithms and programming
object-oriented programming
visual programming
author_facet Kursehi Falgenti
author_sort Kursehi Falgenti
title Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi Objek
title_short Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi Objek
title_full Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi Objek
title_fullStr Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi Objek
title_full_unstemmed Studi Komparatif Program Visual Dinamis untuk Pembelajaran Algoritma dan Pemograman Berorientasi Objek
title_sort studi komparatif program visual dinamis untuk pembelajaran algoritma dan pemograman berorientasi objek
publisher Indonesian Society of Applied Science (ISAS)
series Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology
issn 2723-1453
publishDate 2020-07-01
description As beginners, many first-year students have difficulty understanding object-oriented programming material. To help students learn algorithmic and object-oriented programming material researchers have developed visual programming (PV). Visual programming is a tool to facilitate learning programming. The concept of learning to use PV visualizes the work processes of algorithms and programming. This research aims to compare three dynamic PV tools for object-oriented learning programming that are the most studied. To determine the PV to be compared, a survey was conducted in an online journal database, such as IEEE explore, ACM, and several well-known online publishers. From the survey results, three dynamic PVs were chosen, most widely discussed, namely Jeliot 3, Ville and Jive. All three tools are installed and studied. Comparison results show that each dynamic PV has advantages on certain characteristics. The instructor can choose visual programming by considering the advantages of each PV.
topic algorithms and programming
object-oriented programming
visual programming
url https://journal.isas.or.id/index.php/JACOST/article/view/53
work_keys_str_mv AT kursehifalgenti studikomparatifprogramvisualdinamisuntukpembelajaranalgoritmadanpemogramanberorientasiobjek
_version_ 1721292035255697408