Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure

The assessment systems for green building have been developed and implemented for decades. Well-known systems include the U.S. system LEED, the U.K. system BREEAM, the Canadian system GB tools, and the Japanese system CASBEE. These systems will be discussed and compared together with Taiwan&#821...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tai-Yi Liu, Po-Han Chen, Nelson N. S. Chou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2117
id doaj-05c63de5ffcc4885a8905f5c8c067c0a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05c63de5ffcc4885a8905f5c8c067c0a2020-11-25T00:50:03ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01117211710.3390/su11072117su11072117Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil InfrastructureTai-Yi Liu0Po-Han Chen1Nelson N. S. Chou2New Asia Construction and Development Corporation, 15F, No. 760, Sec. 4, Ba-De Rd., Taipei 10563, TaiwanDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, TaiwanDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, TaiwanThe assessment systems for green building have been developed and implemented for decades. Well-known systems include the U.S. system LEED, the U.K. system BREEAM, the Canadian system GB tools, and the Japanese system CASBEE. These systems will be discussed and compared together with Taiwan’s EEWH system. Each assessment system may contain a different set of evaluation items to evaluate the sustainability level of a building project. Contrarily, the assessment system for green civil infrastructure projects is rarely discussed and developed globally. In Taiwan, studies have been conducted to develop a new assessment system with some reasonable key indicators and evaluation items, serving as the tool to evaluate the sustainability level of a green civil infrastructure project. In this paper, the authors studied and summarized different key indicators and evaluation items, and made comparisons among some major assessment systems for both green building and green civil infrastructure projects. Based on the comparison of the various assessment systems, it is found that greenery, recycling of materials, water conservation, carbon emission reduction, and energy saving are considered in both green building and green civil infrastructure assessment systems. Nevertheless, external building structure, energy consumption, healthy air and temperature, illumination of the indoor environment, rainwater recycling, and underground reservoirs are considered only in green building assessments, but not in green civil infrastructure assessments. Moreover, durability, benefits, landscape, humanities, culture, and creativity, which are discussed adequately in green civil infrastructure assessments, are not highlighted in green building assessments. In addition, two construction projects in Taiwan, one green building project and one green civil infrastructure project, are presented to exemplify sustainability practices and assessments.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2117assessment systemgreen buildinggreen civil infrastructureTaiwan EEWH
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tai-Yi Liu
Po-Han Chen
Nelson N. S. Chou
spellingShingle Tai-Yi Liu
Po-Han Chen
Nelson N. S. Chou
Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure
Sustainability
assessment system
green building
green civil infrastructure
Taiwan EEWH
author_facet Tai-Yi Liu
Po-Han Chen
Nelson N. S. Chou
author_sort Tai-Yi Liu
title Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure
title_short Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure
title_full Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure
title_fullStr Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Assessment Systems for Green Building and Green Civil Infrastructure
title_sort comparison of assessment systems for green building and green civil infrastructure
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-04-01
description The assessment systems for green building have been developed and implemented for decades. Well-known systems include the U.S. system LEED, the U.K. system BREEAM, the Canadian system GB tools, and the Japanese system CASBEE. These systems will be discussed and compared together with Taiwan’s EEWH system. Each assessment system may contain a different set of evaluation items to evaluate the sustainability level of a building project. Contrarily, the assessment system for green civil infrastructure projects is rarely discussed and developed globally. In Taiwan, studies have been conducted to develop a new assessment system with some reasonable key indicators and evaluation items, serving as the tool to evaluate the sustainability level of a green civil infrastructure project. In this paper, the authors studied and summarized different key indicators and evaluation items, and made comparisons among some major assessment systems for both green building and green civil infrastructure projects. Based on the comparison of the various assessment systems, it is found that greenery, recycling of materials, water conservation, carbon emission reduction, and energy saving are considered in both green building and green civil infrastructure assessment systems. Nevertheless, external building structure, energy consumption, healthy air and temperature, illumination of the indoor environment, rainwater recycling, and underground reservoirs are considered only in green building assessments, but not in green civil infrastructure assessments. Moreover, durability, benefits, landscape, humanities, culture, and creativity, which are discussed adequately in green civil infrastructure assessments, are not highlighted in green building assessments. In addition, two construction projects in Taiwan, one green building project and one green civil infrastructure project, are presented to exemplify sustainability practices and assessments.
topic assessment system
green building
green civil infrastructure
Taiwan EEWH
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/2117
work_keys_str_mv AT taiyiliu comparisonofassessmentsystemsforgreenbuildingandgreencivilinfrastructure
AT pohanchen comparisonofassessmentsystemsforgreenbuildingandgreencivilinfrastructure
AT nelsonnschou comparisonofassessmentsystemsforgreenbuildingandgreencivilinfrastructure
_version_ 1725249622807412736