Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?

Abstract Background The aim was to evaluate the geometric and corresponding dosimetric differences between two delineation strategies for head and neck tumors neighboring air cavities. Methods Primary gross and clinical tumor volumes (GTV and CTV) of 14 patients with oropharynx or larynx tumors were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olgun Elicin, Dario Terribilini, Mohamed Shelan, Werner Volken, Etienne Mathier, Alan Dal Pra, Daniel M. Aebersold, Michael K. Fix, Peter Manser
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-06-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-017-0838-4
id doaj-05ee4fd702664182b0f8966949bf5865
record_format Article
spelling doaj-05ee4fd702664182b0f8966949bf58652020-11-24T20:58:33ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2017-06-011211510.1186/s13014-017-0838-4Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?Olgun Elicin0Dario Terribilini1Mohamed Shelan2Werner Volken3Etienne Mathier4Alan Dal Pra5Daniel M. Aebersold6Michael K. Fix7Peter Manser8Department of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of BernAbstract Background The aim was to evaluate the geometric and corresponding dosimetric differences between two delineation strategies for head and neck tumors neighboring air cavities. Methods Primary gross and clinical tumor volumes (GTV and CTV) of 14 patients with oropharynx or larynx tumors were contoured using a soft tissue window (S). In a second strategy, the same volumes were contoured with an extension to include the parts which became visible on lung window (L). For the calculation of Hausdorff-distances (HD) between contoured volumes of the two strategies, triangular meshes were exported. Two radiotherapy plans with identical goals and optimization parameters were generated for each case. Plan_S were optimized on CTV_S, and Plan_L on CTV_L. The dose coverages of CTV_L and CTV_Δ (CTV_L minus CTV_S) were evaluated in Plan_S. OAR doses were compared among Plan_S and Plan_L. Results Median three-dimensional HD for GTVs and CTVs were 5.7 (±2.6) and 9.3 (±2.8) mm, respectively. The median volume differences between structures contoured using L and S windows were 9% (±5%) and 9% (±4%) for GTV and CTV, respectively. In 13 out of 14 cases, Plan_S met the plan acceptance criteria for CTV_L. In 8 cases CTV_Δ was covered insufficiently in Plan_S. Mean and median differences in OAR dose-volume histogram parameters between Plan_S and Plan_L were within 3%. Conclusion For the current practice in radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer, the delineation of L-based volumes seems unnecessary. However, in special settings, where smaller or no PTV margins are used, this approach may play an important role for local control.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-017-0838-4Head and neck cancerRadiotherapyTarget volumeContouring
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olgun Elicin
Dario Terribilini
Mohamed Shelan
Werner Volken
Etienne Mathier
Alan Dal Pra
Daniel M. Aebersold
Michael K. Fix
Peter Manser
spellingShingle Olgun Elicin
Dario Terribilini
Mohamed Shelan
Werner Volken
Etienne Mathier
Alan Dal Pra
Daniel M. Aebersold
Michael K. Fix
Peter Manser
Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?
Radiation Oncology
Head and neck cancer
Radiotherapy
Target volume
Contouring
author_facet Olgun Elicin
Dario Terribilini
Mohamed Shelan
Werner Volken
Etienne Mathier
Alan Dal Pra
Daniel M. Aebersold
Michael K. Fix
Peter Manser
author_sort Olgun Elicin
title Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?
title_short Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?
title_full Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?
title_fullStr Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?
title_full_unstemmed Primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?
title_sort primary tumor volume delineation in head and neck cancer: missing the tip of the iceberg?
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract Background The aim was to evaluate the geometric and corresponding dosimetric differences between two delineation strategies for head and neck tumors neighboring air cavities. Methods Primary gross and clinical tumor volumes (GTV and CTV) of 14 patients with oropharynx or larynx tumors were contoured using a soft tissue window (S). In a second strategy, the same volumes were contoured with an extension to include the parts which became visible on lung window (L). For the calculation of Hausdorff-distances (HD) between contoured volumes of the two strategies, triangular meshes were exported. Two radiotherapy plans with identical goals and optimization parameters were generated for each case. Plan_S were optimized on CTV_S, and Plan_L on CTV_L. The dose coverages of CTV_L and CTV_Δ (CTV_L minus CTV_S) were evaluated in Plan_S. OAR doses were compared among Plan_S and Plan_L. Results Median three-dimensional HD for GTVs and CTVs were 5.7 (±2.6) and 9.3 (±2.8) mm, respectively. The median volume differences between structures contoured using L and S windows were 9% (±5%) and 9% (±4%) for GTV and CTV, respectively. In 13 out of 14 cases, Plan_S met the plan acceptance criteria for CTV_L. In 8 cases CTV_Δ was covered insufficiently in Plan_S. Mean and median differences in OAR dose-volume histogram parameters between Plan_S and Plan_L were within 3%. Conclusion For the current practice in radiotherapy planning for head and neck cancer, the delineation of L-based volumes seems unnecessary. However, in special settings, where smaller or no PTV margins are used, this approach may play an important role for local control.
topic Head and neck cancer
Radiotherapy
Target volume
Contouring
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-017-0838-4
work_keys_str_mv AT olgunelicin primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT darioterribilini primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT mohamedshelan primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT wernervolken primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT etiennemathier primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT alandalpra primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT danielmaebersold primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT michaelkfix primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
AT petermanser primarytumorvolumedelineationinheadandneckcancermissingthetipoftheiceberg
_version_ 1716785539035693056