Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil

Antibiotic residues that enter the soil through swine manure could disturb the number, community structure and functions of microbiota which could also degrade antibiotics in soil. Five different concentrations of doxycycline (DOX) incorporated into swine manure were added to soil to explore the eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qiufan Yan, Xiaoyang Li, Baohua Ma, Yongde Zou, Yan Wang, Xindi Liao, Junboo Liang, Jiandui Mi, Yinbao Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03129/full
id doaj-063574bd131b4715a01362b609a0ca57
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qiufan Yan
Xiaoyang Li
Baohua Ma
Yongde Zou
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Junboo Liang
Junboo Liang
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
spellingShingle Qiufan Yan
Xiaoyang Li
Baohua Ma
Yongde Zou
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Junboo Liang
Junboo Liang
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil
Frontiers in Microbiology
doxycycline degradation
soil microbiome
interaction effect
resistance gene
swine manure
author_facet Qiufan Yan
Xiaoyang Li
Baohua Ma
Yongde Zou
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Yan Wang
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Xindi Liao
Junboo Liang
Junboo Liang
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Jiandui Mi
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
Yinbao Wu
author_sort Qiufan Yan
title Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil
title_short Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil
title_full Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil
title_fullStr Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil
title_full_unstemmed Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil
title_sort different concentrations of doxycycline in swine manure affect the microbiome and degradation of doxycycline residue in soil
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Microbiology
issn 1664-302X
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Antibiotic residues that enter the soil through swine manure could disturb the number, community structure and functions of microbiota which could also degrade antibiotics in soil. Five different concentrations of doxycycline (DOX) incorporated into swine manure were added to soil to explore the effects of DOX on microbiota in soil and degradation itself. The results showed that the soil microbiome evolved an adaptation to the soil containing DOX by generating resistance genes. Moreover, some of the organisms within the soil microbiome played crucial roles in the degradation of DOX. The average degradation half-life of DOX in non-sterile groups was 13.85 ± 0.45 days, which was significantly shorter than the 29.26 ± 0.98 days in the group with sterilized soil (P < 0.01), indicating that the soil microbiome promoted DOX degradation. DOX addition affected the number of tetracycline resistance genes, depending on the type of gene and the DOX concentration. Among these genes, tetA, tetM, tetW, and tetX had significantly higher copy numbers when the concentration of DOX was higher. In contrast, a lower concentration of DOX had an inhibitory effect on tetG. At the same time, the microbial compositions were affected by the initial concentration of DOX and the different experimental periods. The soil chemical indicators also affected the microbial diversity changes, mainly because some microorganisms could survive in adversity and become dominant bacterial groups, such as the genera Vagococcus and Enterococcus (which were associated with electrical conductivity) and Caldicoprobacter spp. (which were positively correlated with pH). Our study mainly revealed soil microbiota and DOX degradation answered differently under variable concentrations of DOX mixed with swine manure in soil.
topic doxycycline degradation
soil microbiome
interaction effect
resistance gene
swine manure
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03129/full
work_keys_str_mv AT qiufanyan differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT xiaoyangli differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT baohuama differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yongdezou differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT junbooliang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT junbooliang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil
_version_ 1725928141047726080
spelling doaj-063574bd131b4715a01362b609a0ca572020-11-24T21:40:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2018-12-01910.3389/fmicb.2018.03129425996Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in SoilQiufan Yan0Xiaoyang Li1Baohua Ma2Yongde Zou3Yan Wang4Yan Wang5Yan Wang6Yan Wang7Xindi Liao8Xindi Liao9Xindi Liao10Xindi Liao11Junboo Liang12Junboo Liang13Jiandui Mi14Jiandui Mi15Jiandui Mi16Jiandui Mi17Yinbao Wu18Yinbao Wu19Yinbao Wu20Yinbao Wu21College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaNanhai Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Foshan, ChinaNanhai Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Foshan, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaLaboratory of Animal Production, Institute of Tropical Agriculture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MalaysiaLaboratory of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioscience, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MalaysiaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaAntibiotic residues that enter the soil through swine manure could disturb the number, community structure and functions of microbiota which could also degrade antibiotics in soil. Five different concentrations of doxycycline (DOX) incorporated into swine manure were added to soil to explore the effects of DOX on microbiota in soil and degradation itself. The results showed that the soil microbiome evolved an adaptation to the soil containing DOX by generating resistance genes. Moreover, some of the organisms within the soil microbiome played crucial roles in the degradation of DOX. The average degradation half-life of DOX in non-sterile groups was 13.85 ± 0.45 days, which was significantly shorter than the 29.26 ± 0.98 days in the group with sterilized soil (P < 0.01), indicating that the soil microbiome promoted DOX degradation. DOX addition affected the number of tetracycline resistance genes, depending on the type of gene and the DOX concentration. Among these genes, tetA, tetM, tetW, and tetX had significantly higher copy numbers when the concentration of DOX was higher. In contrast, a lower concentration of DOX had an inhibitory effect on tetG. At the same time, the microbial compositions were affected by the initial concentration of DOX and the different experimental periods. The soil chemical indicators also affected the microbial diversity changes, mainly because some microorganisms could survive in adversity and become dominant bacterial groups, such as the genera Vagococcus and Enterococcus (which were associated with electrical conductivity) and Caldicoprobacter spp. (which were positively correlated with pH). Our study mainly revealed soil microbiota and DOX degradation answered differently under variable concentrations of DOX mixed with swine manure in soil.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03129/fulldoxycycline degradationsoil microbiomeinteraction effectresistance geneswine manure