Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil
Antibiotic residues that enter the soil through swine manure could disturb the number, community structure and functions of microbiota which could also degrade antibiotics in soil. Five different concentrations of doxycycline (DOX) incorporated into swine manure were added to soil to explore the eff...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Microbiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03129/full |
id |
doaj-063574bd131b4715a01362b609a0ca57 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Qiufan Yan Xiaoyang Li Baohua Ma Yongde Zou Yan Wang Yan Wang Yan Wang Yan Wang Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Junboo Liang Junboo Liang Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu |
spellingShingle |
Qiufan Yan Xiaoyang Li Baohua Ma Yongde Zou Yan Wang Yan Wang Yan Wang Yan Wang Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Junboo Liang Junboo Liang Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil Frontiers in Microbiology doxycycline degradation soil microbiome interaction effect resistance gene swine manure |
author_facet |
Qiufan Yan Xiaoyang Li Baohua Ma Yongde Zou Yan Wang Yan Wang Yan Wang Yan Wang Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Xindi Liao Junboo Liang Junboo Liang Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Jiandui Mi Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu Yinbao Wu |
author_sort |
Qiufan Yan |
title |
Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil |
title_short |
Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil |
title_full |
Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil |
title_fullStr |
Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in Soil |
title_sort |
different concentrations of doxycycline in swine manure affect the microbiome and degradation of doxycycline residue in soil |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Microbiology |
issn |
1664-302X |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
Antibiotic residues that enter the soil through swine manure could disturb the number, community structure and functions of microbiota which could also degrade antibiotics in soil. Five different concentrations of doxycycline (DOX) incorporated into swine manure were added to soil to explore the effects of DOX on microbiota in soil and degradation itself. The results showed that the soil microbiome evolved an adaptation to the soil containing DOX by generating resistance genes. Moreover, some of the organisms within the soil microbiome played crucial roles in the degradation of DOX. The average degradation half-life of DOX in non-sterile groups was 13.85 ± 0.45 days, which was significantly shorter than the 29.26 ± 0.98 days in the group with sterilized soil (P < 0.01), indicating that the soil microbiome promoted DOX degradation. DOX addition affected the number of tetracycline resistance genes, depending on the type of gene and the DOX concentration. Among these genes, tetA, tetM, tetW, and tetX had significantly higher copy numbers when the concentration of DOX was higher. In contrast, a lower concentration of DOX had an inhibitory effect on tetG. At the same time, the microbial compositions were affected by the initial concentration of DOX and the different experimental periods. The soil chemical indicators also affected the microbial diversity changes, mainly because some microorganisms could survive in adversity and become dominant bacterial groups, such as the genera Vagococcus and Enterococcus (which were associated with electrical conductivity) and Caldicoprobacter spp. (which were positively correlated with pH). Our study mainly revealed soil microbiota and DOX degradation answered differently under variable concentrations of DOX mixed with swine manure in soil. |
topic |
doxycycline degradation soil microbiome interaction effect resistance gene swine manure |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03129/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT qiufanyan differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT xiaoyangli differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT baohuama differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yongdezou differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yanwang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT xindiliao differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT junbooliang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT junbooliang differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT jianduimi differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil AT yinbaowu differentconcentrationsofdoxycyclineinswinemanureaffectthemicrobiomeanddegradationofdoxycyclineresidueinsoil |
_version_ |
1725928141047726080 |
spelling |
doaj-063574bd131b4715a01362b609a0ca572020-11-24T21:40:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2018-12-01910.3389/fmicb.2018.03129425996Different Concentrations of Doxycycline in Swine Manure Affect the Microbiome and Degradation of Doxycycline Residue in SoilQiufan Yan0Xiaoyang Li1Baohua Ma2Yongde Zou3Yan Wang4Yan Wang5Yan Wang6Yan Wang7Xindi Liao8Xindi Liao9Xindi Liao10Xindi Liao11Junboo Liang12Junboo Liang13Jiandui Mi14Jiandui Mi15Jiandui Mi16Jiandui Mi17Yinbao Wu18Yinbao Wu19Yinbao Wu20Yinbao Wu21College of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaNanhai Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Foshan, ChinaNanhai Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau, Foshan, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaLaboratory of Animal Production, Institute of Tropical Agriculture, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MalaysiaLaboratory of Molecular Biomedicine, Institute of Bioscience, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, MalaysiaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaCollege of Animal Science, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Enterprise Lab of Healthy Animal Husbandry and Environment Control, Yunfu, ChinaMinistry of Agriculture Key Laboratory of Tropical Agricultural Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, ChinaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, ChinaAntibiotic residues that enter the soil through swine manure could disturb the number, community structure and functions of microbiota which could also degrade antibiotics in soil. Five different concentrations of doxycycline (DOX) incorporated into swine manure were added to soil to explore the effects of DOX on microbiota in soil and degradation itself. The results showed that the soil microbiome evolved an adaptation to the soil containing DOX by generating resistance genes. Moreover, some of the organisms within the soil microbiome played crucial roles in the degradation of DOX. The average degradation half-life of DOX in non-sterile groups was 13.85 ± 0.45 days, which was significantly shorter than the 29.26 ± 0.98 days in the group with sterilized soil (P < 0.01), indicating that the soil microbiome promoted DOX degradation. DOX addition affected the number of tetracycline resistance genes, depending on the type of gene and the DOX concentration. Among these genes, tetA, tetM, tetW, and tetX had significantly higher copy numbers when the concentration of DOX was higher. In contrast, a lower concentration of DOX had an inhibitory effect on tetG. At the same time, the microbial compositions were affected by the initial concentration of DOX and the different experimental periods. The soil chemical indicators also affected the microbial diversity changes, mainly because some microorganisms could survive in adversity and become dominant bacterial groups, such as the genera Vagococcus and Enterococcus (which were associated with electrical conductivity) and Caldicoprobacter spp. (which were positively correlated with pH). Our study mainly revealed soil microbiota and DOX degradation answered differently under variable concentrations of DOX mixed with swine manure in soil.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2018.03129/fulldoxycycline degradationsoil microbiomeinteraction effectresistance geneswine manure |