A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade

During the nineties, the accessibility of large corpora and the possibility of manipulation of enormous quantities of linguistic data was the origin of a renewal of interest in statistical and probability evidences that served to directly question linguistics about its objectives, methods and founda...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacqueline Léon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo 2006-01-01
Series:Filologia e Linguística Portuguesa
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.revistas.usp.br/flp/article/view/59745
id doaj-06430a46d9ff4223a2459d0e692179da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06430a46d9ff4223a2459d0e692179da2020-11-25T00:32:46ZengUniversidade de São PauloFilologia e Linguística Portuguesa1517-45302176-94192006-01-0185181http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v0i8p51-8158527A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidadeJacqueline Léon0Université Paris 7, France During the nineties, the accessibility of large corpora and the possibility of manipulation of enormous quantities of linguistic data was the origin of a renewal of interest in statistical and probability evidences that served to directly question linguistics about its objectives, methods and foundations. This interest gained increasing importance and became important currently under the name of corpus linguistics, a field of dominant research in language science. In this article we will show that the designation corpus linguistics covers considerably heterogeneous theoretical positions and research, topics. We show how corpus linguistics, originally of british origin, was later endowed with historical and theoretical legitimacy while at the same time intending to establish itself as a new paradigm in language science. Finally we distinguish two attitudes inside the british tradition: one, intending to build the studies on a corpus and in a new paradigm based on a retrospective construction of the critical works of chomsky during the years 1959 and 1960, which was intended to legitimize the studies; the other attitude involves the continuity of the tradition of british empirical linguistics.http://www.revistas.usp.br/flp/article/view/59745Corpus LinguisticsGreat CorporaHistoryEpistemologyChomskyBritish Linguistic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jacqueline Léon
spellingShingle Jacqueline Léon
A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade
Filologia e Linguística Portuguesa
Corpus Linguistics
Great Corpora
History
Epistemology
Chomsky
British Linguistic
author_facet Jacqueline Léon
author_sort Jacqueline Léon
title A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade
title_short A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade
title_full A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade
title_fullStr A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade
title_full_unstemmed A Lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade
title_sort lingüística de corpus: história, problemas, legitimidade
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
series Filologia e Linguística Portuguesa
issn 1517-4530
2176-9419
publishDate 2006-01-01
description During the nineties, the accessibility of large corpora and the possibility of manipulation of enormous quantities of linguistic data was the origin of a renewal of interest in statistical and probability evidences that served to directly question linguistics about its objectives, methods and foundations. This interest gained increasing importance and became important currently under the name of corpus linguistics, a field of dominant research in language science. In this article we will show that the designation corpus linguistics covers considerably heterogeneous theoretical positions and research, topics. We show how corpus linguistics, originally of british origin, was later endowed with historical and theoretical legitimacy while at the same time intending to establish itself as a new paradigm in language science. Finally we distinguish two attitudes inside the british tradition: one, intending to build the studies on a corpus and in a new paradigm based on a retrospective construction of the critical works of chomsky during the years 1959 and 1960, which was intended to legitimize the studies; the other attitude involves the continuity of the tradition of british empirical linguistics.
topic Corpus Linguistics
Great Corpora
History
Epistemology
Chomsky
British Linguistic
url http://www.revistas.usp.br/flp/article/view/59745
work_keys_str_mv AT jacquelineleon alinguisticadecorpushistoriaproblemaslegitimidade
AT jacquelineleon linguisticadecorpushistoriaproblemaslegitimidade
_version_ 1725319206707134464