Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?
Sex-biased infections are a recurrent observation in vertebrates. In many species, males are more parasitized than females. Two potentially complementary mechanisms are often suggested to explain this pattern: sexual differences in susceptibility mainly caused by the effect of sex hormones on immuni...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216360 |
id |
doaj-06490c1fdb76403f9ea358f351f6da02 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-06490c1fdb76403f9ea358f351f6da022021-03-03T20:42:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01145e021636010.1371/journal.pone.0216360Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?Camille-Sophie CozzaroloNicolas SironiOlivier GlaizotRomain PigeaultPhilippe ChristeSex-biased infections are a recurrent observation in vertebrates. In many species, males are more parasitized than females. Two potentially complementary mechanisms are often suggested to explain this pattern: sexual differences in susceptibility mainly caused by the effect of sex hormones on immunity and differential exposure to parasites. Exposure is mostly a consequence of host behavioural traits, but vector-borne parasitic infections involve another degree of complexity due to the active role of vectors in transmission. Blood-sucking insects may make choices based on cues produced by hosts. Regarding malaria, several studies highlighted a male-biased infection by Plasmodium sp in great tits (Parus major). We hypothesize that the mosquito vector, Culex pipiens, might at least partially cause this bias by being more attracted to male birds. Intrinsic variation associated to bird sex would explain a preference of mosquitoes for males. To test this hypothesis, we provide uninfected mosquitoes with a choice between uninfected male and female nestlings. Mosquito choice is assessed by sex typing of the ingested blood. We did not observe any preference for a given sex. This result does not support our prediction of a preference of mosquitoes for male great tits during the nestling period. In conclusion, mosquitoes do not seem to have an intrinsic preference for male nestlings. However, sexually divergent traits (e.g. behaviour, odour, metabolic rate) present in adults may play a role in the attraction of mosquitoes and should be investigated.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216360 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo Nicolas Sironi Olivier Glaizot Romain Pigeault Philippe Christe |
spellingShingle |
Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo Nicolas Sironi Olivier Glaizot Romain Pigeault Philippe Christe Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference? PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo Nicolas Sironi Olivier Glaizot Romain Pigeault Philippe Christe |
author_sort |
Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo |
title |
Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference? |
title_short |
Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference? |
title_full |
Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference? |
title_fullStr |
Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference? |
title_sort |
sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: vector preference? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Sex-biased infections are a recurrent observation in vertebrates. In many species, males are more parasitized than females. Two potentially complementary mechanisms are often suggested to explain this pattern: sexual differences in susceptibility mainly caused by the effect of sex hormones on immunity and differential exposure to parasites. Exposure is mostly a consequence of host behavioural traits, but vector-borne parasitic infections involve another degree of complexity due to the active role of vectors in transmission. Blood-sucking insects may make choices based on cues produced by hosts. Regarding malaria, several studies highlighted a male-biased infection by Plasmodium sp in great tits (Parus major). We hypothesize that the mosquito vector, Culex pipiens, might at least partially cause this bias by being more attracted to male birds. Intrinsic variation associated to bird sex would explain a preference of mosquitoes for males. To test this hypothesis, we provide uninfected mosquitoes with a choice between uninfected male and female nestlings. Mosquito choice is assessed by sex typing of the ingested blood. We did not observe any preference for a given sex. This result does not support our prediction of a preference of mosquitoes for male great tits during the nestling period. In conclusion, mosquitoes do not seem to have an intrinsic preference for male nestlings. However, sexually divergent traits (e.g. behaviour, odour, metabolic rate) present in adults may play a role in the attraction of mosquitoes and should be investigated. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216360 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT camillesophiecozzarolo sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference AT nicolassironi sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference AT olivierglaizot sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference AT romainpigeault sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference AT philippechriste sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference |
_version_ |
1714820978488377344 |