Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?

Sex-biased infections are a recurrent observation in vertebrates. In many species, males are more parasitized than females. Two potentially complementary mechanisms are often suggested to explain this pattern: sexual differences in susceptibility mainly caused by the effect of sex hormones on immuni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo, Nicolas Sironi, Olivier Glaizot, Romain Pigeault, Philippe Christe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216360
id doaj-06490c1fdb76403f9ea358f351f6da02
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06490c1fdb76403f9ea358f351f6da022021-03-03T20:42:02ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01145e021636010.1371/journal.pone.0216360Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?Camille-Sophie CozzaroloNicolas SironiOlivier GlaizotRomain PigeaultPhilippe ChristeSex-biased infections are a recurrent observation in vertebrates. In many species, males are more parasitized than females. Two potentially complementary mechanisms are often suggested to explain this pattern: sexual differences in susceptibility mainly caused by the effect of sex hormones on immunity and differential exposure to parasites. Exposure is mostly a consequence of host behavioural traits, but vector-borne parasitic infections involve another degree of complexity due to the active role of vectors in transmission. Blood-sucking insects may make choices based on cues produced by hosts. Regarding malaria, several studies highlighted a male-biased infection by Plasmodium sp in great tits (Parus major). We hypothesize that the mosquito vector, Culex pipiens, might at least partially cause this bias by being more attracted to male birds. Intrinsic variation associated to bird sex would explain a preference of mosquitoes for males. To test this hypothesis, we provide uninfected mosquitoes with a choice between uninfected male and female nestlings. Mosquito choice is assessed by sex typing of the ingested blood. We did not observe any preference for a given sex. This result does not support our prediction of a preference of mosquitoes for male great tits during the nestling period. In conclusion, mosquitoes do not seem to have an intrinsic preference for male nestlings. However, sexually divergent traits (e.g. behaviour, odour, metabolic rate) present in adults may play a role in the attraction of mosquitoes and should be investigated.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216360
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo
Nicolas Sironi
Olivier Glaizot
Romain Pigeault
Philippe Christe
spellingShingle Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo
Nicolas Sironi
Olivier Glaizot
Romain Pigeault
Philippe Christe
Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo
Nicolas Sironi
Olivier Glaizot
Romain Pigeault
Philippe Christe
author_sort Camille-Sophie Cozzarolo
title Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?
title_short Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?
title_full Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?
title_fullStr Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?
title_full_unstemmed Sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: Vector preference?
title_sort sex-biased parasitism in vector-borne disease: vector preference?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Sex-biased infections are a recurrent observation in vertebrates. In many species, males are more parasitized than females. Two potentially complementary mechanisms are often suggested to explain this pattern: sexual differences in susceptibility mainly caused by the effect of sex hormones on immunity and differential exposure to parasites. Exposure is mostly a consequence of host behavioural traits, but vector-borne parasitic infections involve another degree of complexity due to the active role of vectors in transmission. Blood-sucking insects may make choices based on cues produced by hosts. Regarding malaria, several studies highlighted a male-biased infection by Plasmodium sp in great tits (Parus major). We hypothesize that the mosquito vector, Culex pipiens, might at least partially cause this bias by being more attracted to male birds. Intrinsic variation associated to bird sex would explain a preference of mosquitoes for males. To test this hypothesis, we provide uninfected mosquitoes with a choice between uninfected male and female nestlings. Mosquito choice is assessed by sex typing of the ingested blood. We did not observe any preference for a given sex. This result does not support our prediction of a preference of mosquitoes for male great tits during the nestling period. In conclusion, mosquitoes do not seem to have an intrinsic preference for male nestlings. However, sexually divergent traits (e.g. behaviour, odour, metabolic rate) present in adults may play a role in the attraction of mosquitoes and should be investigated.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216360
work_keys_str_mv AT camillesophiecozzarolo sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference
AT nicolassironi sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference
AT olivierglaizot sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference
AT romainpigeault sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference
AT philippechriste sexbiasedparasitisminvectorbornediseasevectorpreference
_version_ 1714820978488377344