Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany

As more animal welfare is required in livestock farming, several approaches have been developed to improve the well-being of farmed animals on a voluntary basis. Since farmers’ acceptance is important for the success of these approaches, their preferences should be considered when developing farm an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iris Schröter, Marcus Mergenthaler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/704
id doaj-067766e1d0f34ded97fdfa7c5cc28eb1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-067766e1d0f34ded97fdfa7c5cc28eb12021-03-06T00:06:52ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-03-011170470410.3390/ani11030704Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in GermanyIris Schröter0Marcus Mergenthaler1South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences, Lübecker Ring 2, 59494 Soest, GermanySouth Westphalia University of Applied Sciences, Lübecker Ring 2, 59494 Soest, GermanyAs more animal welfare is required in livestock farming, several approaches have been developed to improve the well-being of farmed animals on a voluntary basis. Since farmers’ acceptance is important for the success of these approaches, their preferences should be considered when developing farm animal welfare programs. We used choice based conjoint analysis to investigate the preferences of 242 German livestock farmers (147 cattle farmers; 95 pig farmers) regarding the design of farm animal welfare programs. The conditional logit regression models show that the measures serving as basis for remuneration and the compensation level were of decisive importance for the farmers’ choices. The most preferred measure for assessing animal welfare, and thus as the basis for remuneration, was animal health. As expected, a higher compensation level led to greater acceptance of an animal welfare approach. The commitment period was only of subordinate importance with the longer commitment period being preferred. Our study outlines aspects of farm animal welfare programs that might encourage farmers to participate in these programs. Future programs could consider our findings by emphasising health parameters and by creating planning security through longer commitment periods and sufficiently high compensations for farmers’ efforts to improve animal welfare.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/704animal welfareanimal welfare measuresanimal welfare programschoice experimentfarmers’ preferences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Iris Schröter
Marcus Mergenthaler
spellingShingle Iris Schröter
Marcus Mergenthaler
Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany
Animals
animal welfare
animal welfare measures
animal welfare programs
choice experiment
farmers’ preferences
author_facet Iris Schröter
Marcus Mergenthaler
author_sort Iris Schröter
title Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany
title_short Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany
title_full Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany
title_fullStr Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Farmers’ Preferences Regarding the Design of Animal Welfare Programs: Insights from a Choice-Based Conjoint Study in Germany
title_sort farmers’ preferences regarding the design of animal welfare programs: insights from a choice-based conjoint study in germany
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2021-03-01
description As more animal welfare is required in livestock farming, several approaches have been developed to improve the well-being of farmed animals on a voluntary basis. Since farmers’ acceptance is important for the success of these approaches, their preferences should be considered when developing farm animal welfare programs. We used choice based conjoint analysis to investigate the preferences of 242 German livestock farmers (147 cattle farmers; 95 pig farmers) regarding the design of farm animal welfare programs. The conditional logit regression models show that the measures serving as basis for remuneration and the compensation level were of decisive importance for the farmers’ choices. The most preferred measure for assessing animal welfare, and thus as the basis for remuneration, was animal health. As expected, a higher compensation level led to greater acceptance of an animal welfare approach. The commitment period was only of subordinate importance with the longer commitment period being preferred. Our study outlines aspects of farm animal welfare programs that might encourage farmers to participate in these programs. Future programs could consider our findings by emphasising health parameters and by creating planning security through longer commitment periods and sufficiently high compensations for farmers’ efforts to improve animal welfare.
topic animal welfare
animal welfare measures
animal welfare programs
choice experiment
farmers’ preferences
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/704
work_keys_str_mv AT irisschroter farmerspreferencesregardingthedesignofanimalwelfareprogramsinsightsfromachoicebasedconjointstudyingermany
AT marcusmergenthaler farmerspreferencesregardingthedesignofanimalwelfareprogramsinsightsfromachoicebasedconjointstudyingermany
_version_ 1724229922278342656