“What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom

Although a few researchers mention that involving interpreters can have an impact on the research process and research findings, little is published regarding methods of assessing the interpretation work's quality and impact. The impact of lay volunteer interpreters used in audiorecorded semist...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mona Almalik BSc, MSc, Alice Kiger BA, MSc, PhD, Janet Tucker BSc, MPH, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2010-09-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Methods
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900302
id doaj-068e7d6e12d94dffa3e0d243d13b3fd3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-068e7d6e12d94dffa3e0d243d13b3fd32020-11-25T03:36:23ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1609-40692010-09-01910.1177/16094069100090030210.1177_160940691000900302“What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United KingdomMona Almalik BSc, MScAlice Kiger BA, MSc, PhDJanet Tucker BSc, MPH, PhDAlthough a few researchers mention that involving interpreters can have an impact on the research process and research findings, little is published regarding methods of assessing the interpretation work's quality and impact. The impact of lay volunteer interpreters used in audiorecorded semistructured interviews on collecting data and the data quality and subsequent analysis is examined. A new systematic approach is presented comparing original interview transcripts (conducted with volunteer interpreters) with independent transcripts, reinterpretations by professional interpreters. Findings indicate that involving volunteer interpreters had an impact on the validity and reliability of a portion of the data, the subsequent analysis, and some practical research aspects. Researchers involving interpreters should pay careful attention to the interpreters' influence on the research, the data produced, and critically bring this to bear in their analysis and interpretation. The systematic comparative approach is a cost-effective tool that can be used successfully to examine the influence's effects.https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900302
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mona Almalik BSc, MSc
Alice Kiger BA, MSc, PhD
Janet Tucker BSc, MPH, PhD
spellingShingle Mona Almalik BSc, MSc
Alice Kiger BA, MSc, PhD
Janet Tucker BSc, MPH, PhD
“What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom
International Journal of Qualitative Methods
author_facet Mona Almalik BSc, MSc
Alice Kiger BA, MSc, PhD
Janet Tucker BSc, MPH, PhD
author_sort Mona Almalik BSc, MSc
title “What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom
title_short “What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom
title_full “What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr “What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed “What Did She Say? What Did She Say?” the Impact of Interpretation on Recruiting and Interviewing European Migrant Women in the United Kingdom
title_sort “what did she say? what did she say?” the impact of interpretation on recruiting and interviewing european migrant women in the united kingdom
publisher SAGE Publishing
series International Journal of Qualitative Methods
issn 1609-4069
publishDate 2010-09-01
description Although a few researchers mention that involving interpreters can have an impact on the research process and research findings, little is published regarding methods of assessing the interpretation work's quality and impact. The impact of lay volunteer interpreters used in audiorecorded semistructured interviews on collecting data and the data quality and subsequent analysis is examined. A new systematic approach is presented comparing original interview transcripts (conducted with volunteer interpreters) with independent transcripts, reinterpretations by professional interpreters. Findings indicate that involving volunteer interpreters had an impact on the validity and reliability of a portion of the data, the subsequent analysis, and some practical research aspects. Researchers involving interpreters should pay careful attention to the interpreters' influence on the research, the data produced, and critically bring this to bear in their analysis and interpretation. The systematic comparative approach is a cost-effective tool that can be used successfully to examine the influence's effects.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900302
work_keys_str_mv AT monaalmalikbscmsc whatdidshesaywhatdidshesaytheimpactofinterpretationonrecruitingandinterviewingeuropeanmigrantwomenintheunitedkingdom
AT alicekigerbamscphd whatdidshesaywhatdidshesaytheimpactofinterpretationonrecruitingandinterviewingeuropeanmigrantwomenintheunitedkingdom
AT janettuckerbscmphphd whatdidshesaywhatdidshesaytheimpactofinterpretationonrecruitingandinterviewingeuropeanmigrantwomenintheunitedkingdom
_version_ 1724550222808350720