The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.

Guidelines for the management of blood pressure (BP) in primary care generally suggest that decisions be made on the basis of specific threshold values (e.g. BP 140/90 mmHg); but this fails to adequately accommodate a common cause of variation--the play of chance.To determine the impact of chance va...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed A Mohammed, Tom Marshall, Paramjit Gill
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3487729?pdf=render
id doaj-069bd99b95d54f4db0646ff7414ed6d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-069bd99b95d54f4db0646ff7414ed6d12020-11-25T01:45:21ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-01711e4655610.1371/journal.pone.0046556The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.Mohammed A MohammedTom MarshallParamjit GillGuidelines for the management of blood pressure (BP) in primary care generally suggest that decisions be made on the basis of specific threshold values (e.g. BP 140/90 mmHg); but this fails to adequately accommodate a common cause of variation--the play of chance.To determine the impact of chance variability in BP readings on the clinical decision making of general practitioners (GPs) regarding anti-hypertensive treatment and cardiovascular risk management.We used an internet based study design, where 109 GPs were assigned to manage one of eight case vignettes (guidelines would recommend treatment for only one of the eight) and presented with blood pressure readings that were randomly selected from an underlying population.Seventeen (15.6%, 17/109) GPs consulted the vignette for whom treatment was recommended, but only 7/17 (41.2%) GPs prescribed treatment, whereas 14/92 (15.2%) GPs prescribed medication to the other vignettes. When deciding to follow-up a vignette GPs were influenced by threshold values for systolic and diastolic BP, but not by the overall cardiovascular risk. If the first reading was a low BP (systolic <140, diastolic <90) GPs were highly likely to discharge the vignette and follow-up a high BP reading (diastolic >90 or systolic BP≥140). Similar factors predicted the decision to prescribe a drug, although the vignette's cardiovascular risk (>20%) was now statistically significant (p = 0.03).GP decision making, whilst generally consistent with guidelines, appears to be compromised by chance variation leading to under and over treatment. Interventions to adequately accommodate chance variability into clinical decision making are required.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3487729?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammed A Mohammed
Tom Marshall
Paramjit Gill
spellingShingle Mohammed A Mohammed
Tom Marshall
Paramjit Gill
The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Mohammed A Mohammed
Tom Marshall
Paramjit Gill
author_sort Mohammed A Mohammed
title The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
title_short The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
title_full The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
title_fullStr The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
title_full_unstemmed The effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
title_sort effect of chance variability in blood pressure readings on the decision making of general practitioners: an internet-based case vignette study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Guidelines for the management of blood pressure (BP) in primary care generally suggest that decisions be made on the basis of specific threshold values (e.g. BP 140/90 mmHg); but this fails to adequately accommodate a common cause of variation--the play of chance.To determine the impact of chance variability in BP readings on the clinical decision making of general practitioners (GPs) regarding anti-hypertensive treatment and cardiovascular risk management.We used an internet based study design, where 109 GPs were assigned to manage one of eight case vignettes (guidelines would recommend treatment for only one of the eight) and presented with blood pressure readings that were randomly selected from an underlying population.Seventeen (15.6%, 17/109) GPs consulted the vignette for whom treatment was recommended, but only 7/17 (41.2%) GPs prescribed treatment, whereas 14/92 (15.2%) GPs prescribed medication to the other vignettes. When deciding to follow-up a vignette GPs were influenced by threshold values for systolic and diastolic BP, but not by the overall cardiovascular risk. If the first reading was a low BP (systolic <140, diastolic <90) GPs were highly likely to discharge the vignette and follow-up a high BP reading (diastolic >90 or systolic BP≥140). Similar factors predicted the decision to prescribe a drug, although the vignette's cardiovascular risk (>20%) was now statistically significant (p = 0.03).GP decision making, whilst generally consistent with guidelines, appears to be compromised by chance variation leading to under and over treatment. Interventions to adequately accommodate chance variability into clinical decision making are required.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3487729?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedamohammed theeffectofchancevariabilityinbloodpressurereadingsonthedecisionmakingofgeneralpractitionersaninternetbasedcasevignettestudy
AT tommarshall theeffectofchancevariabilityinbloodpressurereadingsonthedecisionmakingofgeneralpractitionersaninternetbasedcasevignettestudy
AT paramjitgill theeffectofchancevariabilityinbloodpressurereadingsonthedecisionmakingofgeneralpractitionersaninternetbasedcasevignettestudy
AT mohammedamohammed effectofchancevariabilityinbloodpressurereadingsonthedecisionmakingofgeneralpractitionersaninternetbasedcasevignettestudy
AT tommarshall effectofchancevariabilityinbloodpressurereadingsonthedecisionmakingofgeneralpractitionersaninternetbasedcasevignettestudy
AT paramjitgill effectofchancevariabilityinbloodpressurereadingsonthedecisionmakingofgeneralpractitionersaninternetbasedcasevignettestudy
_version_ 1725023452312633344