High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background It has been demonstrated that a high‐power, short‐duration (HPSD) ablation during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is effective and safe. However, studies about the HPSD ablation during the posterior wall isolation, the Box isolation (BOXI), are limited. We evaluated the efficacy, f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koichiro Kumagai, Hideko Toyama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12407
id doaj-06a763227d184f5bb218002b64287106
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06a763227d184f5bb218002b642871062020-11-25T03:38:19ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482020-10-0136589990410.1002/joa3.12407High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillationKoichiro Kumagai0Hideko Toyama1Heart Rhythm Center Fukuoka Sanno Hospital International University of Health and Welfare Fukuoka JapanHeart Rhythm Center Fukuoka Sanno Hospital International University of Health and Welfare Fukuoka JapanAbstract Background It has been demonstrated that a high‐power, short‐duration (HPSD) ablation during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is effective and safe. However, studies about the HPSD ablation during the posterior wall isolation, the Box isolation (BOXI), are limited. We evaluated the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of HPSD ablation during BOXI. Methods One‐hundred sixty patients with all types of atrial fibrillation underwent BOXI with HPSD ablation (n = 80) or conventional technique (n = 80). In the HPSD group, ablation was performed with 50 W and a target lesion size index of 5.0 using a contact force (CF) sensing catheter. Ablation near the esophagus was performed with 50 W for 5 seconds and a CF < 10 g. In the conventional group, ablation was performed with 30‐40 W for 30 seconds, but 20 W near the esophagus. Results The BOXI creation (26 ± 8 minutes vs 47 ± 17 minutes, P < .0001) and procedure (65 ± 12 minutes vs 87 ± 23 minutes, P < .0001) times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group than the conventional group. The number of pacing capture sites did not differ between the two groups. No complications including gastrointestinal symptoms occurred. The atrial tachyarrhythmia‐free rate at 12‐months after a single procedure was 86.3% in the HPSD group and 76.3% in the conventional group, respectively (P = .132). The incidence of PV reconnections and gaps in the lines during the second procedure did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion The BOXI with HPSD ablation is effective, feasible, and safe with short BOXI creation and procedure times without reducing the clinical outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12407atrial fibrillationBox isolationcatheter ablationhigh‐power
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Koichiro Kumagai
Hideko Toyama
spellingShingle Koichiro Kumagai
Hideko Toyama
High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation
Journal of Arrhythmia
atrial fibrillation
Box isolation
catheter ablation
high‐power
author_facet Koichiro Kumagai
Hideko Toyama
author_sort Koichiro Kumagai
title High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_short High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_full High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed High‐power, short‐duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation
title_sort high‐power, short‐duration ablation during box isolation for atrial fibrillation
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Arrhythmia
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract Background It has been demonstrated that a high‐power, short‐duration (HPSD) ablation during pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is effective and safe. However, studies about the HPSD ablation during the posterior wall isolation, the Box isolation (BOXI), are limited. We evaluated the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of HPSD ablation during BOXI. Methods One‐hundred sixty patients with all types of atrial fibrillation underwent BOXI with HPSD ablation (n = 80) or conventional technique (n = 80). In the HPSD group, ablation was performed with 50 W and a target lesion size index of 5.0 using a contact force (CF) sensing catheter. Ablation near the esophagus was performed with 50 W for 5 seconds and a CF < 10 g. In the conventional group, ablation was performed with 30‐40 W for 30 seconds, but 20 W near the esophagus. Results The BOXI creation (26 ± 8 minutes vs 47 ± 17 minutes, P < .0001) and procedure (65 ± 12 minutes vs 87 ± 23 minutes, P < .0001) times were significantly shorter in the HPSD group than the conventional group. The number of pacing capture sites did not differ between the two groups. No complications including gastrointestinal symptoms occurred. The atrial tachyarrhythmia‐free rate at 12‐months after a single procedure was 86.3% in the HPSD group and 76.3% in the conventional group, respectively (P = .132). The incidence of PV reconnections and gaps in the lines during the second procedure did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion The BOXI with HPSD ablation is effective, feasible, and safe with short BOXI creation and procedure times without reducing the clinical outcomes.
topic atrial fibrillation
Box isolation
catheter ablation
high‐power
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12407
work_keys_str_mv AT koichirokumagai highpowershortdurationablationduringboxisolationforatrialfibrillation
AT hidekotoyama highpowershortdurationablationduringboxisolationforatrialfibrillation
_version_ 1724542800012247040