Vers une multitude de sexes ?
This article focuses on the choice of a nomination by a subject when it comes to describing their sex, whether it be a ‘third sex’, or quite simply their hetero- homo- or transexuality. The author reminds us that Lacanian-oriented psychoanalysis does not make a fetish of either anatomy or sexual dif...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Les Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme
2017-12-01
|
Series: | Socio |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/socio/2961 |
Summary: | This article focuses on the choice of a nomination by a subject when it comes to describing their sex, whether it be a ‘third sex’, or quite simply their hetero- homo- or transexuality. The author reminds us that Lacanian-oriented psychoanalysis does not make a fetish of either anatomy or sexual difference. The author reviews a series of prejudices, albeit oedipal, which endeavour to see in analytical discourse a vector of normalisation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2266-3134 2425-2158 |