Vers une multitude de sexes ?

This article focuses on the choice of a nomination by a subject when it comes to describing their sex, whether it be a ‘third sex’, or quite simply their hetero- homo- or transexuality. The author reminds us that Lacanian-oriented psychoanalysis does not make a fetish of either anatomy or sexual dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fabian Fajnwaks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Les Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme 2017-12-01
Series:Socio
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/socio/2961
id doaj-06ad0f4a6c1441d1a38b446281d18049
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06ad0f4a6c1441d1a38b446281d180492020-11-24T21:31:59ZengLes Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’HommeSocio2266-31342425-21582017-12-01918520010.4000/socio.2961Vers une multitude de sexes ?Fabian FajnwaksThis article focuses on the choice of a nomination by a subject when it comes to describing their sex, whether it be a ‘third sex’, or quite simply their hetero- homo- or transexuality. The author reminds us that Lacanian-oriented psychoanalysis does not make a fetish of either anatomy or sexual difference. The author reviews a series of prejudices, albeit oedipal, which endeavour to see in analytical discourse a vector of normalisation.http://journals.openedition.org/socio/2961gender studiesqueer studiessocial constructivismheterosexual normthird sexsexual difference
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fabian Fajnwaks
spellingShingle Fabian Fajnwaks
Vers une multitude de sexes ?
Socio
gender studies
queer studies
social constructivism
heterosexual norm
third sex
sexual difference
author_facet Fabian Fajnwaks
author_sort Fabian Fajnwaks
title Vers une multitude de sexes ?
title_short Vers une multitude de sexes ?
title_full Vers une multitude de sexes ?
title_fullStr Vers une multitude de sexes ?
title_full_unstemmed Vers une multitude de sexes ?
title_sort vers une multitude de sexes ?
publisher Les Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme
series Socio
issn 2266-3134
2425-2158
publishDate 2017-12-01
description This article focuses on the choice of a nomination by a subject when it comes to describing their sex, whether it be a ‘third sex’, or quite simply their hetero- homo- or transexuality. The author reminds us that Lacanian-oriented psychoanalysis does not make a fetish of either anatomy or sexual difference. The author reviews a series of prejudices, albeit oedipal, which endeavour to see in analytical discourse a vector of normalisation.
topic gender studies
queer studies
social constructivism
heterosexual norm
third sex
sexual difference
url http://journals.openedition.org/socio/2961
work_keys_str_mv AT fabianfajnwaks versunemultitudedesexes
_version_ 1725959103020269568