BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design i...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Data in Brief |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916300336 |
id |
doaj-06e1fba5fac7458eb6085fae38992229 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-06e1fba5fac7458eb6085fae389922292020-11-25T01:36:20ZengElsevierData in Brief2352-34092016-06-0176670BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cuesHarma Meffert0Soonjo Hwang1Zachary T. Nolan2Gang Chen3James R. Blair4Correspondence to: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Section of Affective and Cognitive Neuroscience, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 15k, Room 300-E, MSC 2670, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. Tel.: +1 301 435 6059; fax: +1 301 594 9959.; National Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesThe neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also “Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control” [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition. Keywords: Cognitive control, Go/No-go, fMRI, Generalized psychophysiological interactions, Inhibitionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916300336 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Harma Meffert Soonjo Hwang Zachary T. Nolan Gang Chen James R. Blair |
spellingShingle |
Harma Meffert Soonjo Hwang Zachary T. Nolan Gang Chen James R. Blair BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues Data in Brief |
author_facet |
Harma Meffert Soonjo Hwang Zachary T. Nolan Gang Chen James R. Blair |
author_sort |
Harma Meffert |
title |
BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues |
title_short |
BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues |
title_full |
BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues |
title_fullStr |
BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues |
title_full_unstemmed |
BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues |
title_sort |
bold data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Data in Brief |
issn |
2352-3409 |
publishDate |
2016-06-01 |
description |
The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also “Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control” [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition. Keywords: Cognitive control, Go/No-go, fMRI, Generalized psychophysiological interactions, Inhibition |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916300336 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT harmameffert bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues AT soonjohwang bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues AT zacharytnolan bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues AT gangchen bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues AT jamesrblair bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues |
_version_ |
1725063707118010368 |