BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues

The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harma Meffert, Soonjo Hwang, Zachary T. Nolan, Gang Chen, James R. Blair
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-06-01
Series:Data in Brief
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916300336
id doaj-06e1fba5fac7458eb6085fae38992229
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06e1fba5fac7458eb6085fae389922292020-11-25T01:36:20ZengElsevierData in Brief2352-34092016-06-0176670BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cuesHarma Meffert0Soonjo Hwang1Zachary T. Nolan2Gang Chen3James R. Blair4Correspondence to: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, Section of Affective and Cognitive Neuroscience, 9000 Rockville Pike, Building 15k, Room 300-E, MSC 2670, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. Tel.: +1 301 435 6059; fax: +1 301 594 9959.; National Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesNational Institutes of Health, United StatesThe neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also “Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control” [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition. Keywords: Cognitive control, Go/No-go, fMRI, Generalized psychophysiological interactions, Inhibitionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916300336
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Harma Meffert
Soonjo Hwang
Zachary T. Nolan
Gang Chen
James R. Blair
spellingShingle Harma Meffert
Soonjo Hwang
Zachary T. Nolan
Gang Chen
James R. Blair
BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
Data in Brief
author_facet Harma Meffert
Soonjo Hwang
Zachary T. Nolan
Gang Chen
James R. Blair
author_sort Harma Meffert
title BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
title_short BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
title_full BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
title_fullStr BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
title_full_unstemmed BOLD data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
title_sort bold data representing activation and connectivity for rare no-go versus frequent go cues
publisher Elsevier
series Data in Brief
issn 2352-3409
publishDate 2016-06-01
description The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also “Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control” [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition. Keywords: Cognitive control, Go/No-go, fMRI, Generalized psychophysiological interactions, Inhibition
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340916300336
work_keys_str_mv AT harmameffert bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues
AT soonjohwang bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues
AT zacharytnolan bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues
AT gangchen bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues
AT jamesrblair bolddatarepresentingactivationandconnectivityforrarenogoversusfrequentgocues
_version_ 1725063707118010368