The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In a manner similar to the television action hero MacGyver, health services researchers need to respond to the pressure of unpredictable demands and constrained time frames. The results are often both innovative and functional, with...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moriarty Helen J, Perera Roshan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-09-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/226
id doaj-06f5a811aaf1405c8d7f231c0d16fe4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-06f5a811aaf1405c8d7f231c0d16fe4f2020-11-25T00:55:22ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-09-0111122610.1186/1472-6963-11-226The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?Moriarty Helen JPerera Roshan<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In a manner similar to the television action hero MacGyver, health services researchers need to respond to the pressure of unpredictable demands and constrained time frames. The results are often both innovative and functional, with the creation of outputs that could not have been anticipated in the initial planning and design of the research.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>In the conduct of health services research many challenges to robust research processes are generated as a result of the interface between academic research, health policy and implementation agendas. Within a complex and rapidly evolving environment the task of the health services researcher is, therefore, to juggle sometimes contradictory pressures to produce valid results.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>This paper identifies the MacGyver-type dilemmas which arise in health services research, wherein innovation may be called for, to maintain the intended scientific method and rigour. These 'MacGyver drivers' are framed as opposing issues from the perspective of both academic and public policy communities. The ideas expressed in this paper are illustrated by four examples from research projects positioned at the interface between public policy strategy and academia.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/226
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Moriarty Helen J
Perera Roshan
spellingShingle Moriarty Helen J
Perera Roshan
The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Moriarty Helen J
Perera Roshan
author_sort Moriarty Helen J
title The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?
title_short The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?
title_full The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?
title_fullStr The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?
title_full_unstemmed The MacGyver effect: alive and well in health services research?
title_sort macgyver effect: alive and well in health services research?
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2011-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In a manner similar to the television action hero MacGyver, health services researchers need to respond to the pressure of unpredictable demands and constrained time frames. The results are often both innovative and functional, with the creation of outputs that could not have been anticipated in the initial planning and design of the research.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>In the conduct of health services research many challenges to robust research processes are generated as a result of the interface between academic research, health policy and implementation agendas. Within a complex and rapidly evolving environment the task of the health services researcher is, therefore, to juggle sometimes contradictory pressures to produce valid results.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>This paper identifies the MacGyver-type dilemmas which arise in health services research, wherein innovation may be called for, to maintain the intended scientific method and rigour. These 'MacGyver drivers' are framed as opposing issues from the perspective of both academic and public policy communities. The ideas expressed in this paper are illustrated by four examples from research projects positioned at the interface between public policy strategy and academia.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/226
work_keys_str_mv AT moriartyhelenj themacgyvereffectaliveandwellinhealthservicesresearch
AT pereraroshan themacgyvereffectaliveandwellinhealthservicesresearch
AT moriartyhelenj macgyvereffectaliveandwellinhealthservicesresearch
AT pereraroshan macgyvereffectaliveandwellinhealthservicesresearch
_version_ 1725230555388182528