From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta

There has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not in a sectarian or exclu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arpita Mitra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/569
id doaj-0706104f903d41a09a938de9fcd8e6b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0706104f903d41a09a938de9fcd8e6b92020-11-25T04:01:39ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-10-011156956910.3390/rel11110569From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and VedāntaArpita Mitra0Independent Scholar, New Delhi 110019, IndiaThere has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not in a sectarian or exclusive way. This article explores the question of where exactly to place him in the chequered history of Vedāntic ideas. It points out that Rāmakṛṣṇa repeatedly referred to different states of consciousness while explaining the difference in the attitudes towards the Divine. This is the basis of his harmonization of the different streams within Vedānta. Again, it is also the basis of his understanding of the place of <i>śakti</i>. He demonstrated that, as long as one has I-consciousness, one is operating within the jurisdiction of <i>śakti</i>, and has to accept <i>śakti</i> as real. On the other hand, in the state of <i>samādhi</i>, which is the only state in which the I-consciosuness disappears, there is neither One nor many. The article also shows that, while Rāmakṛṣṇa accepted all of the different views within Vedānta, he was probably not as distant from the Advaita Vedānta philosopher Ādi Śaṁkara as he has been made out to be.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/569Śrī RāmakṛṣṇaVedāntaĀdi ŚaṁkaraAdvaitaUpaniṣads<i>brahman</i>
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arpita Mitra
spellingShingle Arpita Mitra
From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
Religions
Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa
Vedānta
Ādi Śaṁkara
Advaita
Upaniṣads
<i>brahman</i>
author_facet Arpita Mitra
author_sort Arpita Mitra
title From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
title_short From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
title_full From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
title_fullStr From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
title_full_unstemmed From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
title_sort from <i>līlā</i> to <i>nitya</i> and back: śrī rāmakṛṣṇa and vedānta
publisher MDPI AG
series Religions
issn 2077-1444
publishDate 2020-10-01
description There has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not in a sectarian or exclusive way. This article explores the question of where exactly to place him in the chequered history of Vedāntic ideas. It points out that Rāmakṛṣṇa repeatedly referred to different states of consciousness while explaining the difference in the attitudes towards the Divine. This is the basis of his harmonization of the different streams within Vedānta. Again, it is also the basis of his understanding of the place of <i>śakti</i>. He demonstrated that, as long as one has I-consciousness, one is operating within the jurisdiction of <i>śakti</i>, and has to accept <i>śakti</i> as real. On the other hand, in the state of <i>samādhi</i>, which is the only state in which the I-consciosuness disappears, there is neither One nor many. The article also shows that, while Rāmakṛṣṇa accepted all of the different views within Vedānta, he was probably not as distant from the Advaita Vedānta philosopher Ādi Śaṁkara as he has been made out to be.
topic Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa
Vedānta
Ādi Śaṁkara
Advaita
Upaniṣads
<i>brahman</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/569
work_keys_str_mv AT arpitamitra fromililaitoinityaiandbacksriramakrsnaandvedanta
_version_ 1724445995404623872