From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
There has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not in a sectarian or exclu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/569 |
id |
doaj-0706104f903d41a09a938de9fcd8e6b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-0706104f903d41a09a938de9fcd8e6b92020-11-25T04:01:39ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-10-011156956910.3390/rel11110569From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and VedāntaArpita Mitra0Independent Scholar, New Delhi 110019, IndiaThere has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not in a sectarian or exclusive way. This article explores the question of where exactly to place him in the chequered history of Vedāntic ideas. It points out that Rāmakṛṣṇa repeatedly referred to different states of consciousness while explaining the difference in the attitudes towards the Divine. This is the basis of his harmonization of the different streams within Vedānta. Again, it is also the basis of his understanding of the place of <i>śakti</i>. He demonstrated that, as long as one has I-consciousness, one is operating within the jurisdiction of <i>śakti</i>, and has to accept <i>śakti</i> as real. On the other hand, in the state of <i>samādhi</i>, which is the only state in which the I-consciosuness disappears, there is neither One nor many. The article also shows that, while Rāmakṛṣṇa accepted all of the different views within Vedānta, he was probably not as distant from the Advaita Vedānta philosopher Ādi Śaṁkara as he has been made out to be.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/569Śrī RāmakṛṣṇaVedāntaĀdi ŚaṁkaraAdvaitaUpaniṣads<i>brahman</i> |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Arpita Mitra |
spellingShingle |
Arpita Mitra From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta Religions Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Vedānta Ādi Śaṁkara Advaita Upaniṣads <i>brahman</i> |
author_facet |
Arpita Mitra |
author_sort |
Arpita Mitra |
title |
From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta |
title_short |
From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta |
title_full |
From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta |
title_fullStr |
From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta |
title_full_unstemmed |
From <i>Līlā</i> to <i>Nitya</i> and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta |
title_sort |
from <i>līlā</i> to <i>nitya</i> and back: śrī rāmakṛṣṇa and vedānta |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Religions |
issn |
2077-1444 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
There has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not in a sectarian or exclusive way. This article explores the question of where exactly to place him in the chequered history of Vedāntic ideas. It points out that Rāmakṛṣṇa repeatedly referred to different states of consciousness while explaining the difference in the attitudes towards the Divine. This is the basis of his harmonization of the different streams within Vedānta. Again, it is also the basis of his understanding of the place of <i>śakti</i>. He demonstrated that, as long as one has I-consciousness, one is operating within the jurisdiction of <i>śakti</i>, and has to accept <i>śakti</i> as real. On the other hand, in the state of <i>samādhi</i>, which is the only state in which the I-consciosuness disappears, there is neither One nor many. The article also shows that, while Rāmakṛṣṇa accepted all of the different views within Vedānta, he was probably not as distant from the Advaita Vedānta philosopher Ādi Śaṁkara as he has been made out to be. |
topic |
Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Vedānta Ādi Śaṁkara Advaita Upaniṣads <i>brahman</i> |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/11/569 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT arpitamitra fromililaitoinityaiandbacksriramakrsnaandvedanta |
_version_ |
1724445995404623872 |