Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position

BackgroundThe standard bifrontal application of the bispectral index (BIS) sensor interferes with the operative field in neurosurgery and plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the standard frontal BIS sensor position with an alternative position across the mandible.MethodsTwo BIS™ Qu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shin Young Lee, Young Sung Kim, Byung Gun Lim, Heezoo Kim, Myoung-Hoon Kong, Il-Ok Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014-04-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-66-267.pdf
id doaj-071d70439a3c44598182c7a258b5ac24
record_format Article
spelling doaj-071d70439a3c44598182c7a258b5ac242020-11-25T03:42:12ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632014-04-0166426727310.4097/kjae.2014.66.4.2677843Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular positionShin Young Lee0Young Sung Kim1Byung Gun Lim2Heezoo Kim3Myoung-Hoon Kong4Il-Ok Lee5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundThe standard bifrontal application of the bispectral index (BIS) sensor interferes with the operative field in neurosurgery and plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the standard frontal BIS sensor position with an alternative position across the mandible.MethodsTwo BIS™ Quatro sensors (Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA) mounted on the frontal and mandibular regions were connected to BIS Vista™ monitors on each patient during general anesthesia. Data from each position were collected at awake, loss of consciousness, intubation, incision, every 30 minutes during the intraoperative period and emergence. These data were compared using Bland-Altman and scatter plot analyses.ResultsScatter plot analysis revealed a significant correlation between BIS values of frontal and mandibular positions (R = 0.869, P = 0.000), except during emergence (R = 0.253, P = 0.077). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a negative bias of 3.2 with a limit of agreement of 16.5/-22.9, in which 3.7% of the values were outside of the limit of agreement. Additional values included -2.9 (14.1/-8.3) while patients were awake, -21.7 (14.9/-58.3) at loss of consciousness, -1.8 (9.0/-12.5) during maintenance, and -1.9 (14.9/-18.8) during emergence.ConclusionsOverall, BIS values do not agree between the standard frontal position and an alternative mandibular position. However, during the anesthesia maintenance period, the mandibular position can be availably used as an alternative position if the operative field renders the standard frontal position unavailable.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-66-267.pdfbispectral index monitorselectroencephalographygeneral anesthesiamandible
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shin Young Lee
Young Sung Kim
Byung Gun Lim
Heezoo Kim
Myoung-Hoon Kong
Il-Ok Lee
spellingShingle Shin Young Lee
Young Sung Kim
Byung Gun Lim
Heezoo Kim
Myoung-Hoon Kong
Il-Ok Lee
Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
bispectral index monitors
electroencephalography
general anesthesia
mandible
author_facet Shin Young Lee
Young Sung Kim
Byung Gun Lim
Heezoo Kim
Myoung-Hoon Kong
Il-Ok Lee
author_sort Shin Young Lee
title Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position
title_short Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position
title_full Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position
title_fullStr Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position
title_sort comparison of bispectral index scores from the standard frontal sensor position with those from an alternative mandibular position
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
publishDate 2014-04-01
description BackgroundThe standard bifrontal application of the bispectral index (BIS) sensor interferes with the operative field in neurosurgery and plastic surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the standard frontal BIS sensor position with an alternative position across the mandible.MethodsTwo BIS™ Quatro sensors (Aspect Medical Systems, Newton, MA, USA) mounted on the frontal and mandibular regions were connected to BIS Vista™ monitors on each patient during general anesthesia. Data from each position were collected at awake, loss of consciousness, intubation, incision, every 30 minutes during the intraoperative period and emergence. These data were compared using Bland-Altman and scatter plot analyses.ResultsScatter plot analysis revealed a significant correlation between BIS values of frontal and mandibular positions (R = 0.869, P = 0.000), except during emergence (R = 0.253, P = 0.077). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a negative bias of 3.2 with a limit of agreement of 16.5/-22.9, in which 3.7% of the values were outside of the limit of agreement. Additional values included -2.9 (14.1/-8.3) while patients were awake, -21.7 (14.9/-58.3) at loss of consciousness, -1.8 (9.0/-12.5) during maintenance, and -1.9 (14.9/-18.8) during emergence.ConclusionsOverall, BIS values do not agree between the standard frontal position and an alternative mandibular position. However, during the anesthesia maintenance period, the mandibular position can be availably used as an alternative position if the operative field renders the standard frontal position unavailable.
topic bispectral index monitors
electroencephalography
general anesthesia
mandible
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-66-267.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shinyounglee comparisonofbispectralindexscoresfromthestandardfrontalsensorpositionwiththosefromanalternativemandibularposition
AT youngsungkim comparisonofbispectralindexscoresfromthestandardfrontalsensorpositionwiththosefromanalternativemandibularposition
AT byunggunlim comparisonofbispectralindexscoresfromthestandardfrontalsensorpositionwiththosefromanalternativemandibularposition
AT heezookim comparisonofbispectralindexscoresfromthestandardfrontalsensorpositionwiththosefromanalternativemandibularposition
AT myounghoonkong comparisonofbispectralindexscoresfromthestandardfrontalsensorpositionwiththosefromanalternativemandibularposition
AT iloklee comparisonofbispectralindexscoresfromthestandardfrontalsensorpositionwiththosefromanalternativemandibularposition
_version_ 1724526596460642304