Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study

Objectives: The increasing incidence of fluoroquinolones (FQ) resistance may lower its efficacy in preventing UTI following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). We assessed the efficacy and safety of FQ and fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) in patients undergoing TRUS-PB. Methods: A pro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tristan Delory, Annabelle Goujon, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte, Pauline Arias, Anthony Laurancon-Fretar, Béatrice Bercot, Pierre Mongiat-Artus, Jean-Michel Molina, Matthieu Lafaurie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220322694
id doaj-0736a84246174b6a905ce46e4efffda7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0736a84246174b6a905ce46e4efffda72020-12-27T04:28:31ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases1201-97122021-01-01102269274Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort studyTristan Delory0Annabelle Goujon1Alexandra Masson-Lecomte2Pauline Arias3Anthony Laurancon-Fretar4Béatrice Bercot5Pierre Mongiat-Artus6Jean-Michel Molina7Matthieu Lafaurie8APHP, Infectious Diseases and Tropical medicine department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, F75012, Paris, France; Corresponding authors at: APHP, Infectious Diseases and Tropical medicine department, Saint-Louis Hospital, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.APHP, Urology department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, FranceAPHP, Urology department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, France; Université de Paris, FranceAPHP, Microbiology department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, FranceAPHP, Infectious Diseases and Tropical medicine department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, FranceAPHP, Microbiology department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, France; Université de Paris, FranceAPHP, Urology department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, France; APHP, Microbiology department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, France; APHP, Pharmacy department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, FranceAPHP, Infectious Diseases and Tropical medicine department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, France; Université de Paris, FranceAPHP, Infectious Diseases and Tropical medicine department, Saint-Louis Hospital, F-75010, Paris, France; Corresponding authors at: APHP, Infectious Diseases and Tropical medicine department, Saint-Louis Hospital, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France.Objectives: The increasing incidence of fluoroquinolones (FQ) resistance may lower its efficacy in preventing UTI following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). We assessed the efficacy and safety of FQ and fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) in patients undergoing TRUS-PB. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between April 2017 and June 2019 and enrolled men undergoing TRUS-PB and receiving a single-dose of FQ (FQ-arm) or FT (FT-arm) for UTI prophylaxis per physician’s choice. The primary efficacy endpoint was self-reported TRUS-PB UTI. We assessed baseline factors associated with UTI with logistic regression. Results: A total of 222 men were enrolled, 141/222 (64%) received FQ, and 81/222 (36%) FT. The median age was 67.6 years [IQR, 61.4–72.1] and the Charlson score was 3 [IQR, 3–5]. The overall incidence of self-reported TRUS-PB UTI was 12% (24/197, (95%CI, 8%–17%)): 15% (17/116, (95% CI, 10%–17%)) in FQ-arm, versus 9% (7/81, 95% CI (5%–13%)) in FT-arm (RR = 0.55 (95% CI, 0.22–1.40), p-value = 0.209). No baseline characteristic was significantly associated with TRUS-PB UTI. Safety was similar between the arms: the rate of the reported adverse event was 31% (36/116, (95% CI, 25%–37%) in the FQ-arm versus 36% (28/81, (95% CI, 28%–41%)) in the FT-arm (RR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.64–2.15), p = 0.602). Conclusions: TRUS-PB UTI prophylaxis with FT and FQ has similar efficacy and safety. A randomized comparison of these two antibiotics is warranted.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220322694FosfomycinFluoroquinolonesProphylaxisProstate BiopsyCohort study
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tristan Delory
Annabelle Goujon
Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
Pauline Arias
Anthony Laurancon-Fretar
Béatrice Bercot
Pierre Mongiat-Artus
Jean-Michel Molina
Matthieu Lafaurie
spellingShingle Tristan Delory
Annabelle Goujon
Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
Pauline Arias
Anthony Laurancon-Fretar
Béatrice Bercot
Pierre Mongiat-Artus
Jean-Michel Molina
Matthieu Lafaurie
Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Fosfomycin
Fluoroquinolones
Prophylaxis
Prostate Biopsy
Cohort study
author_facet Tristan Delory
Annabelle Goujon
Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
Pauline Arias
Anthony Laurancon-Fretar
Béatrice Bercot
Pierre Mongiat-Artus
Jean-Michel Molina
Matthieu Lafaurie
author_sort Tristan Delory
title Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study
title_short Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study
title_full Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study
title_fullStr Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) or fluoroquinolone (FQ) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB): A prospective cohort study
title_sort fosfomycin-trometamol (ft) or fluoroquinolone (fq) as single-dose prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (trus-pb): a prospective cohort study
publisher Elsevier
series International Journal of Infectious Diseases
issn 1201-9712
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objectives: The increasing incidence of fluoroquinolones (FQ) resistance may lower its efficacy in preventing UTI following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB). We assessed the efficacy and safety of FQ and fosfomycin-trometamol (FT) in patients undergoing TRUS-PB. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted between April 2017 and June 2019 and enrolled men undergoing TRUS-PB and receiving a single-dose of FQ (FQ-arm) or FT (FT-arm) for UTI prophylaxis per physician’s choice. The primary efficacy endpoint was self-reported TRUS-PB UTI. We assessed baseline factors associated with UTI with logistic regression. Results: A total of 222 men were enrolled, 141/222 (64%) received FQ, and 81/222 (36%) FT. The median age was 67.6 years [IQR, 61.4–72.1] and the Charlson score was 3 [IQR, 3–5]. The overall incidence of self-reported TRUS-PB UTI was 12% (24/197, (95%CI, 8%–17%)): 15% (17/116, (95% CI, 10%–17%)) in FQ-arm, versus 9% (7/81, 95% CI (5%–13%)) in FT-arm (RR = 0.55 (95% CI, 0.22–1.40), p-value = 0.209). No baseline characteristic was significantly associated with TRUS-PB UTI. Safety was similar between the arms: the rate of the reported adverse event was 31% (36/116, (95% CI, 25%–37%) in the FQ-arm versus 36% (28/81, (95% CI, 28%–41%)) in the FT-arm (RR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.64–2.15), p = 0.602). Conclusions: TRUS-PB UTI prophylaxis with FT and FQ has similar efficacy and safety. A randomized comparison of these two antibiotics is warranted.
topic Fosfomycin
Fluoroquinolones
Prophylaxis
Prostate Biopsy
Cohort study
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220322694
work_keys_str_mv AT tristandelory fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT annabellegoujon fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT alexandramassonlecomte fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT paulinearias fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT anthonylauranconfretar fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT beatricebercot fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT pierremongiatartus fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT jeanmichelmolina fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
AT matthieulafaurie fosfomycintrometamolftorfluoroquinolonefqassingledoseprophylaxisfortransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsytruspbaprospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1724369957965266944