Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt

The article argues that so called self-rated health, the best known predictor of mortality, is a research artefact. In lay theories of health that are strongly influenced by biomedicine, health and death are closely related: the worse one’s health, the shorter one’s life. Therefore, self-rated healt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radim Tobolka
Format: Article
Language:ces
Published: Karolinum Press 2015-10-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2015.13
id doaj-0752d94c9c724e20ae4f0b698ef199bf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-0752d94c9c724e20ae4f0b698ef199bf2020-11-25T02:50:27ZcesKarolinum PressActa Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica0567-82932464-70552015-10-0120142758510.14712/24647055.2015.133285Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefaktRadim TobolkaThe article argues that so called self-rated health, the best known predictor of mortality, is a research artefact. In lay theories of health that are strongly influenced by biomedicine, health and death are closely related: the worse one’s health, the shorter one’s life. Therefore, self-rated health implicitly contains one’s estimate of how long one will live. However, it is well known that self-rated life expectancy can be obtained just as well via a direct question. In social – ethnic – groups whose lay theories of health are affected by biomedicine to a limited extent or not at all, the relationship between health and death may be much looser or qualitatively different. In these groups, self-rated health does not correlate with mortality or the correlation is weak. At the same time, upon direct questioning, these people should be just as good in estimating one’s life expectancy as anybody else. For these reasons, so called self-rated health is a redundant concept; an artefact that has been created via unacknowledged biomedicalization of health research. The argument draws on findings of comparative social science (anthropology), STS (Social and Technology Studies) and selected quantitative research.http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2015.13subjective healthbiomedicinebiomedicalization
collection DOAJ
language ces
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Radim Tobolka
spellingShingle Radim Tobolka
Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt
Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica
subjective health
biomedicine
biomedicalization
author_facet Radim Tobolka
author_sort Radim Tobolka
title Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt
title_short Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt
title_full Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt
title_fullStr Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt
title_full_unstemmed Subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt
title_sort subjektivní zdraví jako výzkumný artefakt
publisher Karolinum Press
series Acta Universitatis Carolinae: Philosophica et Historica
issn 0567-8293
2464-7055
publishDate 2015-10-01
description The article argues that so called self-rated health, the best known predictor of mortality, is a research artefact. In lay theories of health that are strongly influenced by biomedicine, health and death are closely related: the worse one’s health, the shorter one’s life. Therefore, self-rated health implicitly contains one’s estimate of how long one will live. However, it is well known that self-rated life expectancy can be obtained just as well via a direct question. In social – ethnic – groups whose lay theories of health are affected by biomedicine to a limited extent or not at all, the relationship between health and death may be much looser or qualitatively different. In these groups, self-rated health does not correlate with mortality or the correlation is weak. At the same time, upon direct questioning, these people should be just as good in estimating one’s life expectancy as anybody else. For these reasons, so called self-rated health is a redundant concept; an artefact that has been created via unacknowledged biomedicalization of health research. The argument draws on findings of comparative social science (anthropology), STS (Social and Technology Studies) and selected quantitative research.
topic subjective health
biomedicine
biomedicalization
url http://www.karolinum.cz/doi/10.14712/24647055.2015.13
work_keys_str_mv AT radimtobolka subjektivnizdravijakovyzkumnyartefakt
_version_ 1724738436173135872