Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter?
Krupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides ratings of s...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making
2015-03-01
|
| Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14925b/jdm14925b.pdf |
| id |
doaj-07683d2de2fc435fb74f560511d0b930 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-07683d2de2fc435fb74f560511d0b9302021-05-02T02:45:19ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752015-03-01102191197Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter?Štěpán Veselý Krupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides ratings of social appropriateness, I also elicit ratings of fairness of all possible offers in an ultimatum game. Ratings of social appropriateness and fairness are similar for low offers (below or equal to the equal split), but not for high offers which are judged to be more appropriate than fair.http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14925b/jdm14925b.pdfappropriateness fairness social norms incentives rating ultimatum game.NAKeywords |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Štěpán Veselý |
| spellingShingle |
Štěpán Veselý Elicitation of normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? Judgment and Decision Making appropriateness fairness social norms incentives rating ultimatum game.NAKeywords |
| author_facet |
Štěpán Veselý |
| author_sort |
Štěpán Veselý |
| title |
Elicitation of
normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_short |
Elicitation of
normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_full |
Elicitation of
normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_fullStr |
Elicitation of
normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Elicitation of
normative and fairness judgments: Do incentives matter? |
| title_sort |
elicitation of
normative and fairness judgments: do incentives matter? |
| publisher |
Society for Judgment and Decision Making |
| series |
Judgment and Decision Making |
| issn |
1930-2975 |
| publishDate |
2015-03-01 |
| description |
Krupka and Weber (2013) introduce an incentive-compatible
coordination game as an alternative method for elicitation of normative
judgments. I show, however, that people provide virtually the same responses in
incentivized and non-incentivized versions of the Krupka-Weber game. Besides
ratings of social appropriateness, I also elicit ratings of fairness of all
possible offers in an ultimatum game. Ratings of social appropriateness and
fairness are similar for low offers (below or equal to the equal split), but
not for high offers which are judged to be more appropriate than
fair. |
| topic |
appropriateness fairness social norms incentives rating ultimatum game.NAKeywords |
| url |
http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14925b/jdm14925b.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT stepanvesely elicitationofnormativeandfairnessjudgmentsdoincentivesmatter |
| _version_ |
1721495913124331520 |